Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T09:11:27.884Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nanocomposites for thermoelectrics and thermal engineering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2015

Bolin Liao
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA; bolin@mit.edu
Gang Chen
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA; gchen2@mit.edu

Abstract

The making of composites has served as a working principle of achieving material properties beyond those of their homogeneous counterparts. The classical effective-medium theory models the constituent phases with local properties drawn from the corresponding bulk values, whose applicability becomes questionable when the characteristic size of individual domains in a composite shrinks to nanometer scale, and the interactions between domains induced by interfacial and size effects become important or even dominant. These unique features of nanocomposites have enabled engineering of extraordinary thermoelectric materials with synergistic effects among their constituents in recent years. For other applications requiring high thermal conductivity, however, interfacial and size effects on thermal transport in nanocomposites are not favorable, although certain practical applications often call for the composite approach. Therefore, understanding nanoscale transport in nanocomposites can help determine appropriate strategies for enhancing the thermal performance for different applications. We review the emerging principles of heat and charge transport in nanocomposites and provide working examples from both thermoelectrics and general thermal engineering.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Schematics showing distinct transport phenomena in (a) macrocomposites and (b) nanocomposites. Blue lines represent interfaces between different material domains. Note: MFP, mean free path; S, Seebeck coefficient; σ, electrical conductivity; k, thermal conductivity; T, temperature.

Figure 1

Figure 2. (a) Power-factor enhancement of a Si/Ge alloy obtained by modulation doping compared with conventional uniform doping and state-of-the-art bulk samples and schematic of the concept of three-dimensional bulk modulation doping (red dots indicate dopants, and purple circles are the nanodomains). (b) Streamline plot of the probability flux of an electron passing through an “electron cloak,” where the background color indicates the phase of the wave function. (c) Sharp dip in the scattering cross-section with respect to the carrier energy created by an electron cloak by suppressing the first two partial waves (l = 0 and l = 1) simultaneously. (a) Reproduced with permission from Reference 24. © 2012 American Chemical Society. (b–c) Reproduced with permission from Reference 31. © 2012 American Physical Society.

Figure 2

Figure 3. (a) Enhancement of Seebeck coefficient (|S|) in a two-dimensional electron gas (ne, electron density) confined in a single atomic layer of SrTi0.8Nb0.2O3 sandwiched by insulating SrTiO3 layers through the quantum confinement effect. (b) Cumulative contribution to the total phonon thermal conductivity versus the phonon mean free path distributions in several thermoelectric materials from first-principles simulations. (c) Schematic showing a hierarchical design of nanostructures covering different length scales for blocking phonons with different mean free paths. A cumulative increase in the thermoelectric figure of merit (zT) is achieved when nanostructures of different length scales are introduced. (a) Reproduced with permission from Reference 42. © 2007 Nature Publishing Group. (b) Reproduced with permission from Reference 68. © 2013 American Society of Mechanical Engineers. (c) Reproduced with permission from Reference 19. © 2012 Nature Publishing Group.

Figure 3

Figure 4. (a) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image (inset: high-resolution TEM image) of the GaAs/AlAs superlattice and (b) measured dependence of the thermal conductivity on the number of superlattice periods at different temperatures. Reproduced with permission from Reference 85. © 2012 American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Figure 4

Figure 5. (a–b) Significantly enhanced thermal conductivity in a drawn polyethylene nanofiber with improved alignment of polymer chains: (a) Transmission electron microscopy image of a drawn polyethylene nanofiber and (b) measured thermal conductivity of the nanofiber with respect to the draw ratio, compared to that of thin films of micrometer-sized fibers. (c–d) Optical microscopic images of stable graphite suspensions with ethylene glycol as the base fluid. In (c), the graphite volume fraction is 0.03%, below the percolation threshold, and the clustering of graphite flakes can be observed, whereas in (d), the graphite volume fraction is 0.1%, and the formation of a percolation network can be observed. (a–b) Reproduced with permission from Reference 94. © 2010 Nature Publishing Group. (c–d) Reproduced with permission from Reference 99. © 2012 American Chemical Society.