Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T18:05:12.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Angstrom-scale ionic streaming when the electrical double-layer concept fails

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 July 2025

Jiajia Lu
Affiliation:
School of Physical Science and Technology, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, PR China
Shuyong Luan
Affiliation:
National Key Laboratory of Aircraft Configuration Design, School of Aeronautics and Institute of Extreme Mechanics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, PR China
Shenghui Guo
Affiliation:
School of Physical Science and Technology, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, PR China
Libing Duan
Affiliation:
School of Physical Science and Technology, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, PR China
Guanghua Du
Affiliation:
Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, PR China
Yanbo Xie*
Affiliation:
National Key Laboratory of Aircraft Configuration Design, School of Aeronautics and Institute of Extreme Mechanics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, PR China
*
Corresponding author: Yanbo Xie, ybxie@nwpu.edu.cn

Abstract

A knowledge gap exists for flows and transport phenomena at the angstrom scale when the Poisson–Nernst–Planck equation based on the concept of the electrical double layer fails. We discovered that streaming conductance becomes pressure-dependent in angstrom channels using latent-track membranes. The streaming current emerges only when the applied pressure exceeds a threshold value, which is inconsistent with the existing knowledge as a constant. With increasing channel size, we found that the pressure-dependent streaming conductance phenomenon weakens and vanishes into a constant streaming conductance regime when the mean channel radius exceeds $\sim$2 nm. The effective surface potential derived from the streaming conductance that divides conduction anomalously increases as the channel narrows. We suspect that the pressure-dependent streaming current is due to the reinforced Coulomb interaction between counterions and deprotonated carboxyl groups at the surface, which is close to the ion channel but different from that of electrified two-dimensional materials. The streaming current emerged due to hydrodynamic friction when the counterions were released from the surface. We approximated the stochastic process of counterion dissociation by a one-dimensional Kramer escape theory framework and defined the Damk$\ddot {\mathrm{o}}$hler number to describe the transition from the nonlinear streaming conductance regime to the linear regime as functions of applied pressure and channel radius and well explained the enhanced effective surface potential in confinement.

Information

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a) The fabrication process of latent-track channels, including heavy ion irradiation (step I), UV irradiation (step II), electrophoresis to remove the radiolysis products in a 50 $^{\circ }\mathrm{C}$ water bath (step III) and thermal annealing, if needed, in a 70 $^{\circ }\mathrm{C}$ water bath to increase the channel size (step IV). The schemes are not to scale. (b) The latent-track channels stained by $\mathrm{RuO_4}$ are represented as bright straight lines under TEM. We statistically measured the brightness projected onto the bottom line and took half the peak width of the brightness as the channel diameter. (c) The radius calculated from the measured conductance (black squares) increases with annealing time. However, only channels with diameters larger than 2 nm are visible under TEM (yellow triangles). A numerical fit (yellow dashed line) provides a reference for the channel size. Conductance measurements may underestimate channel size due to blockade effects in confinement.

Figure 1

Table 1. Diameter of channels from calculated conductance, stained specimens under TEM and numerical fitting.

Figure 2

Figure 2. (a) Schematic diagram of the device for streaming current measurement. (b) Schematic description of ion transport across a PET membrane under an external pressure. (c) The current recordings (lower panel) when applied pressure (upper panel) was turned on. (d) The averaged streaming current exponentially increases with applied pressure in specimen TA50, with typical I–V curves in the inset that also show a strong nonlinear feature. (e) The streaming current gradually shows a linear response to the applied pressure as the channel radius grows. The current amplitudes of specimens TA70–40 and CE were divided by factors of 300 and 2 $\times$$10^4$, respectively, to make a comparison of the $\Delta p{-}I_s$ curves over a wide range of channel size.

Figure 3

Figure 3. (a) The normalised streaming conductance ($S/S_{max}$) shows strong pressure dependency in angstrom channels and gradually becomes a constant as radius increases. (b) Normalised $S/G$ versus normalised conductance for specimens across a wide range of radius. For small-size channels, the normalised $S/G$ decreases with increasing normalised conductance $(S/G)_n \sim (G/G_{\it{CE}})^{-1/2}$, thus being inversely proportional to the radius $(S/G)_n \sim R^{-1}$.

Figure 4

Figure 4. (a) Scheme of molecular streaming with a counterion (yellow) strongly bound to surface charge (white), causing pressure-dependent streaming current. (b) The thermal dynamics process of bound ions under the action of hydrodynamic friction can be described by the 1-D Kramer escape problem from a Coulomb potential well. (c) The dimensionless coefficient $Da/(Da+1)$ describes the nonlinearity of streaming current as functions of applied pressure and channel radius. The yellow region indicates constant streaming conductance zone. (d) The streaming current flux normalised by surface charge density ($j_s/\varSigma$) as a function of applied pressure in channels of three different sizes, where the colour corresponds to the dashed lines in (c).

Supplementary material: File

Lu et al. supplementary material

Lu et al. supplementary material
Download Lu et al. supplementary material(File)
File 715.2 KB