Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-kv2lp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T02:17:19.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Barcoding hybrids: heterogeneous distribution of Schistosoma haematobium × Schistosoma bovis hybrids across the Senegal River Basin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2018

NELE A. M. BOON
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Genomics, Biology, University of Leuven, Ch. Deberiotstraat 32, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium Unit of Medical Helminthology, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
FREDERIK VAN DEN BROECK
Affiliation:
Unit of Molecular Parasitology, Unit of Veterinary Protozoology, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
DJIBY FAYE
Affiliation:
Sante Plus, 9756 Sacré Coeur 3, BP 11294 Dakar, Sénégal
FILIP A. M. VOLCKAERT
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Genomics, Biology, University of Leuven, Ch. Deberiotstraat 32, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
SOULEYMANE MBOUP
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Virologie du CHNU Aristide Le Dantec, Dakar, Sénégal
KATJA POLMAN
Affiliation:
Unit of Medical Helminthology, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
TINE HUYSE*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Royal Museum for Central Africa, Leuvensesteenweg 13, B-3080 Tervuren, Belgium
*
*Corresponding author: Tine Huyse, Department of Biology, Royal Museum for Central Africa, Leuvensesteenweg 13, B-3080 Tervuren, Belgium. E-mail: Tine.Huyse@africamuseum.be

Abstract

Hybridization events between Schistosoma species (Digenea, Platyhelminthes) are reported with increasing frequency, largely due to improved access to molecular tools. Nevertheless, little is known about the distribution and frequency of hybrid schistosomes in nature. Screening for hybrids on a large scale is complicated by the need for nuclear and mitochondrial sequence information, precluding a ‘simple’ barcoding approach. Here we aimed to determine and understand the spatiotemporal distribution of Schistosoma haematobium × Schistosoma bovis hybrids in the Senegal River Basin. From ten villages, distributed over the four main water basins, we genotyped a total of 1236 schistosome larvae collected from human urine samples using a partial mitochondrial cox1 fragment; a subset of 268 parasites was also genotyped using ITS rDNA. Hybrid schistosomes were unevenly distributed, with substantially higher numbers in villages bordering Lac de Guiers than in villages from the Lampsar River and the Middle Valley of the Senegal River. The frequency of hybrids per village was not linked with the prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis in that village. However, we did find a significant positive association between the frequency of hybrids per village and the prevalence of Schistosoma mansoni. We discuss the potential consequences of adopting a barcoding approach when studying hybrids in nature.

Information

Type
Special Issue Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Map with the sample locations in the Senegal River Basin including in the Middle Valley the villages of Diatar, Dioundiou, and Kodit; towards the coast, in the Senegal River Delta the village of Rhonne; in the vicinity of Lac de Guiers on the eastern shore the village of Mbane, on the western shore the villages of Ndieumeul and Diokhor Tack, and north of the lake the village of Pakh; in the Lampsar River, a tributary of the Senegal River, the villages Mbodienne and Pont Gendarme. For each region, the percentage of hybrids (i.e. parasites with a S. bovis cox1 mtDNA profile) is indicated by a pie chart.

Figure 1

Table 1. Overview of parasite barcoding and prevalence of schistomiasis in Northern Senegal per geographical region, village and year of sampling: the ITS rDNA genotype and cox1 haplotype of Schistosoma haematobium miracidia collected from urines; the prevalence of urinary and intestinal schistosomiasis.

Figure 2

Table 2. The cox1 haplotype (A) and ITS rDNA genotype (B) of all schistosome adult worms, eggs and miracidia sampled in Northern Senegal between 2006 and 2010. S.h /S.b and S.h /S.m indicate that two species bands were observed during the RD-PCR or fragment analysis, or that two peaks were visible after Sanger sequencing.

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Biplot of a principal component analysis on the percentage of larval schistosomes with S. bovis cox1 mtDNA (hybrids), the prevalence of S. haematobium (Prev_S. haem) and the prevalence of S. mansoni (Prev_S.mans) in nine villages in Northern Senegal by year of sampling. The cumulative proportion is 0.91 for the first two principal components (PC1: 0.61; PC2: 0.30). Observations were coloured per geographical region (Middle Valley Senegal River: yellow; Delta Senegal River: red; Lampsar River: green; Lac de Guiers: colourless). The prevalence of S. haematobium and S. mansoni was based on egg counts (microscopy), the frequency of hybrids was based on the molecular identification of eggs or miracidia.

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Scatter plot of the association between the percentage of hybrids and Schistosoma mansoni prevalence. The linear regression of the percentage of hybrids per village and per year, for all regions combined, is indicated by the dotted regression line (P = 0.004, R2 = 46.7%, regression coefficient = 0.32). The coloured regression lines show the associations for each geographical region separately.

Supplementary material: File

Boon et al. supplementary material

Figures S1-S2

Download Boon et al. supplementary material(File)
File 11.9 MB