Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-th4rj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T07:45:22.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ADULT ANTHROPOMETRIC MEASURES AND SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS INFLUENCING AGE AT MENARCHE OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN MALAYSIA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2013

MD. GOLAM HOSSAIN,
AI-SZE WEE,
MAEIRAH ASHAIE and
T. KAMARUL
MD. GOLAM HOSSAIN*
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh
AI-SZE WEE
Affiliation:
National Orthopaedic Centre of Excellence for Research and Learning (NOCERAL), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
MAEIRAH ASHAIE
Affiliation:
National Orthopaedic Centre of Excellence for Research and Learning (NOCERAL), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
T. KAMARUL
Affiliation:
National Orthopaedic Centre of Excellence for Research and Learning (NOCERAL), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
*
1Corresponding author. Email: hossain95@yahoo.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Early onset of menarche has been shown to be associated with breast cancer and ischaemic heart disease. Studies on age at menarche of the Malaysian population are poorly documented. This study aimed to determine the influence of anthropometric and socio-demographic factors on the age at menarche of university students in Malaysia. Data were obtained in 2010–11 from 961 students between the ages of 18 and 25 years from the University of Malaya using stratified sampling, and multiple regression analysis was applied. Sixty-three per cent of students reached menarche at the age of 12 or 13 years, with the mean and median of age at menarche being 12.45±1.17 and 12.01 years, respectively. Menarcheal age was positively associated with height (p<0.05) and negatively associated with BMI (p<0.001). Students from urban areas attained menarche earlier than those from rural areas (p<0.05). Students from small-sized families attained menarche earlier than those from larger families (p<0.05). First-born students experienced menarche earlier than those who were seventh-born or later. Obese and overweight students reached menarche earlier than students who were underweight or of normal weight (p<0.01). The variations in age at menarche among the Malaysian ethnic groups were statistically insignificant. The results suggest that heavier and first-born students from small families are more likely to attain menarche earlier than their counterparts.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 45 , Issue 5 , September 2013, pp. 705 - 717
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Introduction

Menarche is the onset of menstruation and is considered to be the central event of female puberty. Early onset of menarche has been reported to be a positive indicator of breast cancer (Kelsey, Reference Kelsey1993; Kotsopoulos et al., Reference Kotsopoulos, Lubinski, Lynch, Neuhausen, Ghadirian and Isaacs2005; Shin et al., Reference Shin, Song, Yoo and Sung2011; Dogan et al., Reference Dogan, Kalaylioglu, Karaman, Ozaslan, Atalay and Altinok2011), pelvic inflammatory disease and spontaneous abortion (Helm et al., Reference Helm, Münster and Schmidt1996) and cardiovascular disease (Cooper et al., Reference Cooper, Ephross, Weinberg, Baird, Whelan and Sandler1999; Lakshman et al., Reference Lakshman, Forouhi, Sharp, Luben, Bingham and Khaw2009). Also, early menarche may be a risk factor for lower lung function and asthma in adulthood (Macsali et al., Reference Macsali, Real, Plana, Sunyer, Anto and Dratva2011). On the other hand, delayed menarche may be associated with an increased risk of irregular menstrual cycles and low peak bone mass (Anai et al., Reference Anai, Miyazaki, Tomiyasu and Matsuo2001).

The age at menarche (menarcheal age) is defined as the occurrence of the first menstrual cycle. The age at menarche varies from population to population and is associated with several factors such as anthropometric measures, physiological strength (ability of a person to exert force on physical objects using muscles), nutritional status, ethnic group, geographical location, life-style (expressed as both work and leisure behaviour patterns and activities, attitudes, interests, opinion, values and allocation of income of an individual) and other socioeconomic and demographic factors (Shangold et al., Reference Shangold, Kelly, Berkeley, Freedman and Groshen1989; Georgiadis et al., Reference Georgiadis, Mantzoros, Evagelopoulou and Spentzos1997; Bharati & Bharati, Reference Bharati and Bharati1998; Laitinen et al., Reference Laitinen, Power and Järvelin2001; Okasha et al., Reference Okasha, McCarron, McEwen and Smith2001; Padez, Reference Padez2003; Ersoy et al., Reference Ersoy, Balkan, Gunay, Onag and Egemen2004; Chavarro et al., Reference Chavarro, Villamor, Narváez and Hoyos2004; Wronka & Pawlińska-Chmara, Reference Wronka and Pawlińska-Chmara2005; Gharravi et al., Reference Gharravi, Gharravi, Marjani, Moradi and Golalipour2008; Hossain et al., Reference Hossain, Islam, Aik, Zaman and Lestrel2010; Goon et al., Reference Goon, Toriola, Uever, Wuam and Toriola2010; Cho et al., Reference Cho, Park, Shin, Hur, Kim and Kim2010; Adali & Koc, Reference Adalı and Koç2011). It is apparent that these factors have undergone drastic changes over time, resulting in alteration in the age of menarche. This is reflected by the gradual decline in the average age of menarche globally (Zegeye et al., Reference Zegeye, Megabiaw and Mulu2009; Cabanes et al., Reference Cabanes, Ascunce, Vidal, Ederra, Barcos and Erdozain2009).

Okasha et al. (Reference Okasha, McCarron, McEwen and Smith2001) suggested that the relationship between menarcheal age and adult anthropometric measures may be important in understanding the significance of the effects of menarcheal age on disease in later life. Special attention should be given to university female students considering their potential influence on the family and their contribution to the nation's workforce and productivity. Due to their unique role in the population, it is therefore important to investigate the relationship between the age at menarche of university students and their anthropometric measures and socioeconomic and demographic factors.

Some researchers have investigated the association of university students' age at menarche with anthropometric measures and socio-demographic factors for different countries (Okasha et al., Reference Okasha, McCarron, McEwen and Smith2001; Padez, Reference Padez2003; Chavarro, Reference Chavarro, Villamor, Narváez and Hoyos2004; Gharravi et al., Reference Gharravi, Gharravi, Marjani, Moradi and Golalipour2008; Hossain et al., Reference Hossain, Islam, Aik, Zaman and Lestrel2010). The multi-ethnic population of Malaysia, consisting mainly of Malays, Chinese and Indians, is ideal to reflect the centralized geographical location between the Far East and the Indian Peninsula. However, studies on this have not been well documented and analysed (Tan et al., Reference Tan, Othman, Butz and Davanzo1983; Lee et al., Reference Lee, Chen, Lee and Kaur2006). The aim of the present study was to look at the association between age at menarche of university students in Malaysia and their anthropometric measures and socio-demographics profiles.

Methods

A total number of 961 healthy university female students were enrolled in the present study. The participants were Malaysian citizens and aged from 18 to 25 years. The samples were collected from the student's residing hall of the University of Malaya, Malaysia, from July 2010 to April 2011 using stratified random sampling with a proportional allocation technique.

The University of Malaya, being one of the largest universities in Malaysia, was a good site to conduct this study since the students were of multi-ethnicity and originated from all over the country. In addition, because the university is a government-owned institution and therefore admissions to any degree course are based on government agency selection criteria (which are based on pure merit, quota for the underprivileged etc.), enrolled students represent Malaysian families of varying socioeconomic status. Thus the study sample was representative of the average young women living in the country. The subjects were from three major ethnic groups: Malays, 769 (80%); Chinese, 120 (12.5%); and Indians, 72 (7.5%).

The subjects were interviewed by a single interviewer. A standardized questionnaire was used to collect socioeconomic and demographic information from each subject. Age at menarche was estimated by the recall method and based on the age at menarche given by the study subjects. Subjects reported their age at menarche on the basis of their last birthday. The same interviewer also took the anthropometric measurements. Body height was measured as the distance from the highest point of the top of the head in the mid-sagittal plane to the floor by anthropometer, and body weight was taken with thin clothing using a weighing scale. Body mass index (BMI) was derived, defined as the ratio of weight in kilograms to height squared in metres.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to calculate the mean and standard deviations for age at menarche. The Probit model was used to estimate median age at menarche (Table 2). Subjects were classified into three main ethnicities: Malays, Chinese and Indians. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to find the differences in age at menarche among the ethnicities. The standard assumptions of ANOVA (normality and homogeneity of group variances) were checked using the normal probability plot and the Levene test, respectively. The post hoc compression (LSD) test was utilized to find pair-wise differences among the group's data.

Multiple linear regression analysis was used to find the relationship between age at menarche and several quantitative and ordinal variables such as height, BMI, parents' education level and family income, as modelled below:

(1)$$AAM=\beta _0+\beta _1FE+\beta _2ME+\beta _3Ht+\beta _4BMI+\beta _5FI+\epsilon$$

, where AAM (age at menarche) is the response variable, and FE (father's education), ME (mother's education), Ht (height), BMI (body mass index) and FI (family income) are predictors.

The estimated regression model was:

(2)$$AAM\ \^ =11.90-0.037\ FE-0.066\ ME+0.014\ Ht-0.064\ BMI-0.004\ FI$$

.

The important assumption of multiple regression analysis is that the predictor variables must be independent of each other to avoid multicollinearity problems. The multicollinearity problems that would otherwise result in inaccuracies should first be removed. A statistical tool (Variance Inflation Factors, VIF) can be used to detect the multicollinearity caused by the predictor variables (Chatterjee & Hadi, Reference Chatterjee and Hadi2006). In the present study, the relationship between the predictor variables was examined using VIF as follows: (1) if 0<VIF<5, there is no evidence of a multicollinearity problem; (2) if 5≤VIF≤10, there is a moderate multicollinearity problem; and (3) if VIF>10, there is a serious multicollinearity problem of variables. These showed no multicollinearity problem among predictors (Table 3).

To determine the relationship between menarcheal age and body size, the sample was again subdivided into four groups according to the most widely used categories of BMI for adults: underweight (BMI≤18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5<BMI<25 kg/m2), overweight (25≤BMI<30 kg/m2) and obese (BMI≥30 kg/m2) (Flegal et al., Reference Flegal, Graubard, Williamson and Gail2005; Subramanian et al., Reference Subramanian, Perkins and Khan2009).

Finally, Student's t-test was utilized for comparison of mean values between two groups: residence (urban and rural), father's occupation (professional and non-professional) and mother's occupation (housewife and employed). Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS software (version 15.0). A value of p<0.05 was regarded as statistically significant in the analysis.

Results

The age at menarche of 961 healthy university students was investigated in this study. The range of menarcheal age was 9 to 16 years. Most of the students (91.2%) reached menarche between 11 and 14 years of age, with more than 63% of the students attaining menarche between 12 and 13 years of age. A minority of students (3.8%) experienced menarche at the early age of between 9 and 10 years. Similarly, only a small number of students (4.9%) experienced a delayed menarche (between 15 and 16 years) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Frequency distribution of age at menarche, Malaysian university students, 2010–11

The average and median age at menarche of university students in Malaysia was 12.45±1.17 years (95% CI for mean: 12.38–12.53 years) and 12.01 years, respectively. Individually, Malay female students experienced menarche at 12.45±1.16 years (95% CI for mean: 12.37–12.53 years) and a median at 11.99 years. Chinese female students experienced menarche later than Malays and Indians (12.55±1.29 years, 95% CI for mean: 12.32–12.78 years, and median 12.74 years). On the other hand, Indian female students attained menarche earlier than both Malays and Chinese students (12.35±1.19 years, 95% CI for mean: 12.07–12.63 years, and median 11.90 years) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics of age at menarche by ethnic group, Malaysian university students, 2010–11

Table 3.

Multiple regression analysis of influence of body measurements and socio-demographic factors on age at menarche, Malaysian university students, 2010–11

Table 4.

Difference in age at menarche by parents' occupation and residence, Malaysian university students, 2010–11

* 5% level of significance.

Analysis of variance (ANOVA)

One-way ANOVA was applied to find the variation of menarcheal age between the ethnic groups. The normality and homogeneity of the ethnic group were checked using the normal probability plot and the Levene test prior to the ANOVA analysis. The normal probability plot showed that the data followed a normal distribution. The Levene test showed that the data were homogeneous. Therefore, the data satisfied the standard assumption of the ANOVA model. The ANOVA results demonstrated that variation in age at menarche among the ethnic groups was statistically insignificant (p>0.05).

Multiple regression analysis

The coefficients of the regression model showed that the age at menarche of students was positively associated with their height (p<0.05) and negatively associated with their BMI (p<0.001). There was neither significant association between menarcheal age of students with their parents' education nor family income. These results suggest that heavier female students reached menarche earlier than those who were thinner.

Post hoc compression test

The post hoc compression (LSD) was used to find the pair-wise differences in age at menarche among the family size (number of sibling groups) and birth order groups. In this study, 49% of participants came from large families with five or more children and 2.7% of students were from small families with one or two children. The LSD test demonstrated that Malaysian university students from large families attained menarche significantly later (12.54±1.13 years) than those from smaller families (12.38±1.13 years, p<0.05, medium sized family with three or four children; 12.08±1.13 years, p<0.01, small family with one to two children) (Fig. 1). In addition, students who were born seventh or in later position (birth order) (6.2%) experienced a later menarche (12.88±1.26 years) than those born in an earlier position (12.47±1.19 years, p<0.05, for fourth to sixth birth order (25.4%); 12.47±1.21 years, p<0.05, for second to third birth order (31.2%); and 12. 43±1.10 years, p<0.01, for first-born (37.1%)) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Trends in age at menarche with increasing family size and birth order.

The respondents were classified into four groups according to their categorized BMI. More than 68% of students were of normal weight, 20.1% underweight, 8.5% overweight and only 3.1% obese. The pattern of age at menarche decreased along with increased body size (Fig. 2). The LSD test indicated that the age at menarche of overweight and obese students was significantly earlier than that of underweight and normal weight students (p<0.001). These results suggest that heavier students attained menarche earlier than thinner students.

Fig. 2.

Trends in age at menarche with increasing body size.

The mean values of BMI and age at menarche by ethnic group are depicted graphically in Fig. 3. Age at menarche showed a negative association with BMI by ethnic group. Female Indian students' BMI values were larger than those of Chinese and Malays; and they reached menarche earlier. Conversely, Chinese female students reached menarche later than Indians and Malays and they were thinner (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Association between age at menarche and BMI by ethnic group.

Student's t-test

Student's t-test was used to test for significant differences in age at menarche between two groups. It was interesting to note that the mothers of approximately 70% of university students in Malaysia were housewives and that 57.3% of students were from rural areas. Students from urban environments reached menarche earlier (p<0.05) than their counterparts from rural areas. There was no significant relation between parents' occupations and their daughter's menarcheal age.

Discussion

The data used in this study were collected from female university students covering three major ethnic groups living in urban and rural areas of Malaysia. Tan et al. (Reference Tan, Othman, Butz and Davanzo1983) investigated the association between age at menarche and socioeconomic and demographic factors of adult females in Peninsular Malaysia. Their data were obtained from the Malaysian Family Life Survey conducted in 1967–77. Their main focus was on socioeconomic and demographic factors as predictors, and they found that age at menarche was associated with age at first marriage and age at first birth. More recently, Lee et al. (Reference Lee, Chen, Lee and Kaur2006) studied menstrual disturbance among secondary school girls in Malaysia. Although previous studies have looked into socioeconomic conditions and their influence on menarche, as far as the authors of this paper are aware, the present study may be the first to investigate the association of age at menarche with anthropometric measures and socio-demographic factors of young females in modern-day Malaysia. Furthermore, while the data obtained during the era when Malaysia was an undeveloped nation may be valid, the changes in the country's economic prowess and socio-demographic conditions have had a major impact on Malaysian society, thus rendering previous published data obsolete.

In the present study, the average age at menarche of Malaysian female students was found to be 12.45 years, and median 12.01 years. The range of menarcheal age was from 9 to 19 years, and more than 63% of female students reached menarche at between 12 and 13 years of age. This information is relatively consistent with other studies on Malaysian girls. A study on Malaysian adolescent females living in Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia, reported their average menarcheal age to be 12.3 years (Lee et al., Reference Lee, Chen, Lee and Kaur2006), close to the value of 12.5 years found for adolescent females in the USA by Anderson et al. (Reference Anderson, Dallal and Must2003). In other countries, age of menarche has been found to vary slightly: in Canada, 12.72 years (Al-Sahab et al., Reference Al-Sahab, Ardern, Hamadeh and Tamim2010); in Portugal, 12.32 years (Padez, Reference Padez2003); in Iran, 12.20 years (Gharrravi et al., Reference Gharravi, Gharravi, Marjani, Moradi and Golalipour2008); and in China, 12.76 years (Song et al., Reference Song, Ma, Hu and Zhang2011). Amongst the less developed countries, age of menarche appears to be later than in Malaysian females: in Indonesia, 12.96 years (Batubara et al., Reference Batubara, Soesanti and van de Waal2010); in Bangladesh, 13.12 years (Hossain et al., Reference Hossain, Sabiruzzaman, Islam, Hisyam, Lestrel and Zaman2011); in Nigeria, 12.9 years (Lawan et al., Reference Lawan, Yusuf and Musa2010) and in Ethiopia, 15.8 years (Zegeye et al., Reference Zegeye, Megabiaw and Mulu2009).

The present study found no significant differences between ethnic groups, although Indian students experienced menarche earlier. The subjects in the present study were born and grew up in the same environment in Malaysia, in order to fit the hypothesis that environment is an important factor for age at menarche. The study showed that Malaysian Chinese females experienced menarche at a similar age (12.55 years) as Chinese females in China (12.76 years, Song et al., Reference Song, Ma, Hu and Zhang2011), but Malaysian Indian females attained menarche earlier (12.35 years) than Indian females in India (12.80 years, Sanyal & Ray, Reference Sanyal and Ray2008).

Age at menarche and adult anthropometric measures

The coefficients of regression analysis showed that age at menarche increased with increased height and decreased BMI, that is, heavier students attained earlier menarche than thinner students. Also, the post hoc (LSD) test demonstrated that obese and overweight students reached menarche earlier than underweight and normal weight students. Indian students were heavier than Chinese students, and had an earlier menarche (Fig. 3). Adult body size was the best predictor of early onset of menarche. In a South Asian study, Hossain et al. (Reference Hossain, Islam, Aik, Zaman and Lestrel2010) reported that taller and heavier university students in Bangladesh attained menarche earlier than shorter and thinner females. Similar findings were found by Ersoy et al. (Reference Ersoy, Balkan, Gunay, Onag and Egemen2004), who reported an inverse relationship between age at menarche and post-menarcheal weight and BMI of Turkish students. The present results also corroborate the study of Okasha et al. (Reference Okasha, McCarron, McEwen and Smith2001), who reported that age at menarche of students at the University of Glasgow was positively associated with height and negatively associated with weight and BMI. The results of the present study are also in agreement with that of an Iranian study (Gharravi et al., Reference Gharravi, Gharravi, Marjani, Moradi and Golalipour2008), which reported that age at menarche of university students in Iran was positively associated with height.

Age at menarche and socioeconomic status

Regression coefficients in the present study demonstrated that there was no association between menarcheal age of university students and their parents' educational levels and occupations. To the authors' knowledge, there have been no comparable studies on this in Malaysia to date. However, a similar study conducted on female university students in Portugal (Padez, Reference Padez2003) found no association between a student's age at menarche and their parents' educational levels and occupations. However, in a similar study at a Bangladeshi University, the mother's educational level and occupation (and not the father's) was found to have a significant influence on their daughter's age at menarche (Hossain et al., Reference Hossain, Islam, Aik, Zaman and Lestrel2010). An American study also found that parents' education was not a predictor of early age at menarche amongst the American population, either Black or White (Braithwaite et al., Reference Braithwaite, Moore, Lustig, Epel, Ong and Rehkopf2009). The present study found that economic status (family income) did not have a significant effect on age at menarche. This result was in agreement with an Iranian study, which reported that there was no significant difference in menarche age in the different socioeconomic classes of Iranian university students (Gharravi et al., Reference Gharravi, Gharravi, Marjani, Moradi and Golalipour2008). Most studies conducted in different nations have found that socioeconomic factors are important predictors of age at menarche. Females from families of high socioeconomic status attained menarche earlier than those from families with lower socioeconomic status (Tan et al., Reference Tan, Othman, Butz and Davanzo1983; Abioye-Kuteyi et al., Reference Abioye-Kuteyi, Ojofeitimi, Aina, Kio, Aluko and Mosuro1997; Ersoy et al., Reference Ersoy, Balkan, Gunay, Onag and Egemen2004; Chavarro et al., Reference Chavarro, Villamor, Narváez and Hoyos2004; Wronka & Pawlińska, Reference Wronka and Pawlińska-Chmara2005; Wronka, Reference Wronka2010; Hossain et al., Reference Hossain, Islam, Aik, Zaman and Lestrel2010).

The present study demonstrated that female university students from urban areas of Malaysia experienced menarche earlier than those from rural locations. Similar findings have been reported from Portugal (Padez, Reference Padez2003), Spain (Marrodán et al., Reference Marrodán, Mesa, Aréchiga and Pérez-Magdaleno2000), Bangladesh (Hossain et al., Reference Hossain, Islam, Aik, Zaman and Lestrel2010), Iran (Delavar & Hajian-Tilaki, Reference Delavar and Hajian-Tilaki2008), China (Song et al., Reference Song, Ma, Hu and Zhang2011) and Turkey (Adalı & Koc, Reference Adalı and Koç2011).

Age at menarche and demographic factors

The present study demonstrated that family size (number of siblings) and birth order were important predictors of age at menarche amongst Malaysian female students. Students from large families with five or more children attained menarche later than those from small families. Moreover, students who were born earlier in the family had an earlier menarche than those who were born in seventh or later position (birth order). These results are in agreement with the findings of Padez (Reference Padez2003), who reported that family size and birth order were important indicators for menarcheal age of university students in Portugal. In addition, Chavarro et al. (Reference Chavarro, Villamor, Narváez and Hoyos2004) reported that age at menarche was positively associated with family size in a study of students at the National University of Colombia, USA. However, Hossain et al. (Reference Hossain, Islam, Aik, Zaman and Lestrel2010) found that there was no association between age at menarche and family size (number of siblings) and birth order in Bangladeshi university students. These differences may be reflective of the disparity in the socioeconomic backgrounds of these two countries. It could be that an increase in the size of a family may result in lesser appropriation of wealth. However, this does not explain why similar finding was not found in countries such as Bangladesh.

Conclusion

This study investigated the relationship between age at menarche and some selected anthropometric measures and socio-demographic factors of 961 healthy university students in Malaysia. It demonstrated that adult body size is an important indicator of age at menarche. Also, family size and birth order are equally important demographic predictors of menarcheal age. Other possible influences include birth weight (Silva et al., Reference Silva, De Stavola, Mann, Kuh, Hardy and Wadsworth2002; Terry et al., Reference Terry, Ferris, Tehranifar, Wei and Flom2009), mother's BMI (Keim et al., Reference Keim, Branum, Klebanoff and Zemel2009), childhood living conditions (Kac et al., Reference Kac, Auxiliadora de Santa Cruz and Velasquez-Melendez2000), food habits in childhood (Windham et al., Reference Windham, Bottomley, Birner and Fenster2004), physical activity, life-style factors and nutrition (Merzenich et al., Reference Merzenich, Boeing and Wahrendorf1993), waist circumference and maternal menarcheal age (Cho et al., Reference Cho, Park, Shin, Hur, Kim and Kim2010). However, bearing in mind that the sample population may still be biased due to the demographics of the sample site, more research is required to further investigate the relationship between age at menarche and anthropometric measures and socio-demographic factors of Malaysians. This may include recruitment from more universities and various parts of Malaysia.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the authority of Students' Residence Hall (College), University of Malaya, for giving permission to take data from female students. The research is approved by the ethical committee of the institution. There was no grant, technical or corporate support for this research project. All authors declared that there were no conflicts of interests in relation to this study.

References

Abioye-Kuteyi, E. A., Ojofeitimi, E. O., Aina, O. I., Kio, F., Aluko, Y. & Mosuro, O. (1997) The influence of socioeconomic and nutritional status on menarche in Nigerian school girls. Nutrition and Health 11(3), 185–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adalı, T. & Koç, I. (2011) Menarcheal age in Turkey: secular trend and socio-demographic correlates. Annals of Human Biology 38(3), 345–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Al-Sahab, B., Ardern, C. I., Hamadeh, M. J. & Tamim, H. (2010) Age at menarche in Canada: results from the National Longitudinal Survey of Children & Youth. BMC Public Health 10, 736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anai, T., Miyazaki, F., Tomiyasu, T. & Matsuo, T. (2001) Risk of irregular menstrual cycles and low peak bone mass during early adulthood associated with age at menarche. Pediatrics International 43(5), 483–488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, S. E., Dallal, G. E. & Must, A. (2003) Relative weight and race influence average age at menarche: results from two nationally representative surveys of US girls studied 25 years apart. Pediatrics 111 (4Pt 1), 844–850.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batubara, J. R., Soesanti, F. & van de Waal, H. D. (2010) Age at menarche in Indonesian girls: a national survey. Acta Medica Indonesiana 42(2), 78–81.Google ScholarPubMed
Bharati, S. & Bharati, P. (1998) Relationship between menarcheal age and nutritional anthropometry in urban girls of the Howrah District, West Bengal, India. Anthropologischer Anzeiger 56(1), 57–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braithwaite, D., Moore, D. H., Lustig, R. H., Epel, E. S., Ong, K. K., Rehkopf, D. H.et al. (2009) Socioeconomic status in relation to early menarche among black and white girls. Cancer Causes & Control 20(5), 713–720.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cabanes, A., Ascunce, N., Vidal, E., Ederra, M., Barcos, A., Erdozain, N.et al. (2009) Decline in age at menarche among Spanish women born from 1925 to 1962. BMC Public Health 4(9), 449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatterjee, S. & Hadi, A. S. (2006) Regression Analysis by Example, 4th edition. John Wiley and Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chavarro, J., Villamor, E., Narváez, J. & Hoyos, A. (2004) Socio-demographic predictors of age at menarche in a group of Colombian university women. Annals of Human Biology 31(2), 245–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, G. J., Park, H. T., Shin, J. H., Hur, J. Y., Kim, Y. T., Kim, S. H.et al. (2010) Age at menarche in a Korean population: secular trends and influencing factors. European Journal of Pediatrics 169(1), 89–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, G. S., Ephross, S. A., Weinberg, C. R., Baird, D. D., Whelan, E. A. & Sandler, D. P. (1999) Menstrual and reproductive risk factors for ischemic heart disease. Epidemiology 10(3), 255–259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delavar, M. A. & Hajian-Tilaki, K. O. (2008) Age at menarche in girls born from 1985 to 1989 in Mazandaran, Islamic Republic of Iran. East Medical Health Journal 14(1), 90–94.Google ScholarPubMed
Dogan, L., Kalaylioglu, Z., Karaman, N., Ozaslan, C., Atalay, C. & Altinok, M. (2011) Relationships between epidemiological features and tumor characteristics of breast cancer. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention 12(12), 3375–3380.Google ScholarPubMed
Ersoy, B., Balkan, C., Gunay, T., Onag, A. & Egemen, A. (2004) Effects of different socioeconomic conditions on menarche in Turkish female students. Early Human Development 76(2), 115–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flegal, K. M., Graubard, B. I., Williamson, D. F. & Gail, M. H. (2005) Excess deaths associated with underweight, overweight, and obesity. Journal of the American Medical Association 93(15), 1861–1867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgiadis, E., Mantzoros, C. S., Evagelopoulou, C. & Spentzos, D. (1997) Adult height and menarcheal age of young women in Greece. Annals of Human Biology 24(1), 55–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gharravi, A. M., Gharravi, S., Marjani, A., Moradi, A. & Golalipour, M. J. (2008) Correlation of age at menarche and height in Iranian student girls living in Gorgan – northeast of Iran. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association 58(8), 426–429.Google ScholarPubMed
Goon, D. T., Toriola, A. L., Uever, J., Wuam, S. & Toriola, O. M. (2010) Growth status and menarcheal age among adolescent school girls in Wannune, Benue State, Nigeria. BMC Pediatrics 19, 10–60.Google Scholar
Helm, P., Münster, K. R. & Schmidt, L. (1996) Menarche in relation to infertility and adult height and weight. Ugeskrift for Laeger 158(47), 6763–6765.Google ScholarPubMed
Hossain, M. G., Islam, S., Aik, S., Zaman, T. K. & Lestrel, P. E. (2010) Age at menarche of university students in Bangladesh: secular trends and association with adult anthropometric measures and socio-demographic factors. Journal of Biosocial Science 42(5), 677–687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hossain, M. G., Sabiruzzaman, M., Islam, S., Hisyam, R. Z., Lestrel, P. E. & Zaman, T. K. (2011) Influence of anthropometric measures and socio-demographic factors on menstrual pain and irregular menstrual cycles among university students in Bangladesh. Anthropological Science 119(3), 239–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kac, G., Auxiliadora de Santa Cruz, C. & Velasquez-Melendez, G. (2000) Secular trend in age at menarche for women born between 1920 and 1979 in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Annals of Human Biology 27(4), 423–428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keim, S. A., Branum, A. M., Klebanoff, M. A. & Zemel, B. S. (2009) Maternal body mass index and daughters' age at menarche. Epidemiology 20(5), 677–681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelsey, J. L. (1993) Breast cancer epidemiology: summary and future directions. Epidemiologic Reviews 15(1), 256–263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kotsopoulos, J., Lubinski, J., Lynch, H. T., Neuhausen, S. L., Ghadirian, P., Isaacs, C.et al. (2005) Age at menarche and the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Cancer Causes & Control 16(6), 667–674.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laitinen, J., Power, C. & Järvelin, M. R. (2001) Family social class, maternal body mass index, childhood body mass index, and age at menarche as predictors of adult obesity. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 74(3), 287–294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lakshman, R., Forouhi, N. G., Sharp, S. J., Luben, R., Bingham, S. A., Khaw, K. T.et al. (2009) Early age at menarche associated with cardiovascular disease and mortality. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 94(12), 4953–4960.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawan, U. M, Yusuf, N. W. & Musa, A. B. (2010) Menstruation and menstrual hygiene amongst adolescent school girls in Kano, Northwestern Nigeria. African Journal of Reproductive Health 14(3), 201–207.Google ScholarPubMed
Lee, L. K., Chen, P. C., Lee, K. K. & Kaur, J. (2006) Menstruation among adolescent girls in Malaysia: a cross-sectional school survey. Singapore Medical Journal 47(10), 869–874.Google ScholarPubMed
Macsali, F., Real, F. G., Plana, E., Sunyer, J., Anto, J., Dratva, J.et al. (2011) Early age at menarche, lung function, and adult asthma. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 183(1), 8–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marrodán, M. D., Mesa, M. S., Aréchiga, J. & Pérez-Magdaleno, A. (2000) Trend in menarcheal age in Spain: rural and urban comparison during a recent period. Annals of Human Biology 27(3), 313–319.Google Scholar
Merzenich, H., Boeing, H. & Wahrendorf, J. (1993) Dietary fat and sports activity as determinants for age at menarche. American Journal of Epidemiology 138(4), 217–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okasha, M., McCarron, P., McEwen, J. & Smith, G. D. (2001) Age at menarche: secular trends and association with adult anthropometric measures. Annals of Human Biology 28(1), 68–78.Google ScholarPubMed
Padez, C. (2003) Social background and age at menarche in Portuguese university students: a note on the secular changes in Portugal. American Journal of Human Biology 15(3), 415–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanyal, S. & Ray, S. (2008) Variation in the menstrual characteristics in adolescents of West Bengal. Singapore Medical Journal 49(7), 542–550.Google ScholarPubMed
Shangold, M. M., Kelly, M., Berkeley, A. S., Freedman, K. S. & Groshen, S. (1989) Relationship between menarcheal age and adult height. Southern Medical Journal 82(4), 443–445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shin, A., Song, Y. M., Yoo, K. Y. & Sung, J. (2011) Menstrual factors and cancer risk among Korean women. International Journal of Epidemiology 40(5), 1261–1268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silva, dos Santos I., De Stavola, B. L., Mann, V., Kuh, D., Hardy, R. & Wadsworth, M. E. (2002) Prenatal factors, childhood growth trajectories and age at menarche. International Journal of Epidemiology 31(2), 405–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, Y., Ma, J., Hu, P. J. & Zhang, B. (2011) Geographic distribution and secular trend of menarche in 9–18 year-old Chinese Han girls. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao 43(3), 360–364.Google ScholarPubMed
Subramanian, S. V., Perkins, J. M. & Khan, K. T. (2009) Do burdens of underweight and overweight coexist among lower socioeconomic groups in India? American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 90(2), 369–376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tan, B. A., Othman, R., Butz, W. P. & Davanzo, J. (1983) Age at menarche in Peninsular Malaysia: time trends, ethnic differentials, and association with ages at marriage and at first birth. Malaysian Journal of Reproductive Health 1(2), 91–108.Google Scholar
Terry, M. B., Ferris, J. S., Tehranifar, P., Wei, Y. & Flom, J. D. (2009) Birth weight, postnatal growth, and age at menarche. American Journal of Epidemiology 170(1), 72–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Windham, G. C., Bottomley, C., Birner, C. & Fenster, L. (2004) Age at menarche in relation to maternal use of tobacco, alcohol, coffee, and tea during pregnancy. American Journal of Epidemiology 159(9), 862–871.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wronka, I. (2010) Association between BMI and age at menarche in girls from different socio-economic groups. Anthropologischer Anzeiger 68 (1), 43–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wronka, I. & Pawlińska-Chmara, R. (2005) Menarcheal age and socio-economic factors in Poland. Annals of Human Biology 32(5), 630–638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zegeye, D. T., Megabiaw, B. & Mulu, A. (2009) Age at menarche and the menstrual pattern of secondary school adolescents in northwest Ethiopia. BMC Womens Health 5, 9–29.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1.Frequency distribution of age at menarche, Malaysian university students, 2010–11

Figure 1

Table 2.Descriptive statistics of age at menarche by ethnic group, Malaysian university students, 2010–11

Figure 2

Table 3.Multiple regression analysis of influence of body measurements and socio-demographic factors on age at menarche, Malaysian university students, 2010–11

Figure 3

Table 4.Difference in age at menarche by parents' occupation and residence, Malaysian university students, 2010–11

Figure 4

Fig. 1.Trends in age at menarche with increasing family size and birth order.

Figure 5

Fig. 2.Trends in age at menarche with increasing body size.

Figure 6

Fig. 3.Association between age at menarche and BMI by ethnic group.