Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-6grmk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T10:02:44.701Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Detecting hybridization in African schistosome species: does egg morphology complement molecular species identification?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2017

NELE A. M. BOON*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Genomics, Biology, University of Leuven, Ch. Deberiotstraat 32, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium Unit of Medical Helminthology, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
WOUTER FANNES
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Royal Museum for Central Africa, Leuvensesteenweg 13, B-3080 Tervuren, Belgium
SARA ROMBOUTS
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Genomics, Biology, University of Leuven, Ch. Deberiotstraat 32, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
KATJA POLMAN
Affiliation:
Unit of Medical Helminthology, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
FILIP A. M. VOLCKAERT
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Genomics, Biology, University of Leuven, Ch. Deberiotstraat 32, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
TINE HUYSE
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Royal Museum for Central Africa, Leuvensesteenweg 13, B-3080 Tervuren, Belgium
*
*Corresponding author: Laboratory of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Genomics, Biology, University of Leuven, Ch. Deberiotstraat 32, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. E-mail: Nele.boon@kuleuven.be

Summary

Hybrid parasites may have an increased transmission potential and higher virulence compared to their parental species. Consequently, hybrid detection is critical for disease control. Previous crossing experiments showed that hybrid schistosome eggs have distinct morphotypes. We therefore compared the performance of egg morphology with molecular markers with regard to detecting hybridization in schistosomes. We studied the morphology of 303 terminal-spined eggs, originating from 19 individuals inhabiting a hybrid zone with natural crosses between the human parasite Schistosoma haematobium and the livestock parasite Schistosoma bovis in Senegal. The egg sizes showed a high variability and ranged between 92·4 and 176·4 µm in length and between 35·7 and 93·0 µm in width. No distinct morphotypes were found and all eggs resembled, to varying extent, the typical S. haematobium egg type. However, molecular analyses on the same eggs clearly showed the presence of two distinct partial mitochondrial cox1 profiles, namely S. bovis and S. haematobium, and only a single nuclear ITS rDNA profile (S. haematobium). Therefore, in these particular crosses, egg morphology appears not a good indicator of hybrid ancestry. We conclude by discussing strengths and limitations of molecular methods to detect hybrids in the context of high-throughput screening of field samples.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 
Figure 0

Table 1. Host individual information (demographic factors and infection status) and sample information concerning the number of eggs measured and genotyped per host

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Boxplots for egg length, width and ratio per host individual. Only individuals with at least ten measured eggs are shown. The boxplots are based on median values.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Scatter plot showing the length and width of terminal-spined eggs. The relation between egg length and egg width is indicated by a regression line. Kernel density histograms are shown for egg length and egg width. Eggs originating from urine samples (UE) are shown in green, eggs originating from stool samples (SE) are in blue.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Scatter plot showing the length and width of genotyped, terminal-spined eggs. The relation between egg length and egg width is indicated by a regression line. Kernel density histograms are shown for egg length and egg width. Eggs genotyped as HH (S. haematobium) are shown in blue, HB eggs (S. haematobium × S. bovis) in orange.

Figure 4

Table 2. Egg measurements from urine and stool samples

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Photographs of a selection of terminal-spined eggs measured in this study. Eggs A–D were genotyped as HH (S. haematobium) based on ITS and cox1, the eggs E–L were genotyped as HB (S. haematobium × S. bovis).

Supplementary material: File

Boon supplementary material

Table S1

Download Boon supplementary material(File)
File 16.2 KB