Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-6grmk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T12:58:24.884Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inconsistent genetic structure among members of a multitrophic system: did bruchid parasitoids (Horismenus spp.) escape the effects of bean domestication?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2012

S. Laurin-Lemay
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Université de Montréal, CP 6128, Succursale Centre-Ville, Montréal, Québec, CanadaH3C 3J7
B. Angers
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Université de Montréal, CP 6128, Succursale Centre-Ville, Montréal, Québec, CanadaH3C 3J7
B. Benrey*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d'Entomologie Évolutive, Université de Neuchâtel, 11 rue Emile-Argand, CP 158, CH-2009, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
J. Brodeur
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Université de Montréal, CP 6128, Succursale Centre-Ville, Montréal, Québec, CanadaH3C 3J7
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: +41 327183001 E-mail: betty.benrey@unine.ch
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Anthropogenic range expansion and cultural practices have modified the distribution, abundance and genetic diversity of domesticated organisms, thereby altering multitrophic assemblages through space and time. The putative Mesoamerican domestication centre of the common bean, Phaseolus vulgaris L., in Mexico allows investigating the effects of plant domestication on the genetic structure of members of a multitrophic system. The aim of this study was to compare the evolutionary history of Horismenus parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) to those of their bruchid beetle hosts (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) and their domesticated host plant (P. vulgaris), in the context of traditional agriculture in Mexico. We analyzed the population genetic structure of four Horismenus species in Mexico using mitochondrial COI haplotype data. The two most abundant parasitoid species were Horismenus depressus and Horismenus missouriensis. Horismenus missouriensis were infected by Wolbachia endosymbionts and had little to no population differentiation (FST = 0.06). We suspect the mitochondrial history of H. missouriensis to be blurred by Wolbachia, because differentiation among infected vs. non-infected individuals exists (FST = 0.11). Populations of H. depressus were found to be highly differentiated (FST = 0.34), but the genetic structuring could not be explained by tested spatial components. We then compared the genetic structure observed in this parasitoid species to previously published studies on bruchid beetles and their host plants. Despite extensive human-mediated migration and likely population homogenization of its two Acanthoscelides bruchid beetle hosts, H. depressus populations are structured like its host plant, by a recent dispersal from a diverse ancestral gene pool. Distinct evolutionary dynamics may explain inconsistent patterns among trophic levels. Parasitoids likely migrate from wild bean populations and are poorly adapted to bean storage conditions similar to their bruchid beetle hosts. Integrating several trophic levels to the study of evolutionary history has proven to be fruitful in detecting different ecological responses to human-mediated disturbances and host parasite interactions.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Sampling sites in the southern altiplano of Mexico. Circles represent sites that were used in this study. Three regions are identified with letters A, B, and C.

Figure 1

Table 1. Abundances of parasitoids, bruchid beetles (Acanthoscelides and Zabrotes), and the bean species from which studied insects emerged.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Monophyletic group differentiation by Bayesian and maximum likelihood analysis of the observed COI sequences of the SSCP survey. Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) and ML bootstrap support values (BS) are shown in this order for each clade on the tree obtained by BI analysis.

Figure 3

Table 2. Genetic diversity of mtDNA fragments. Sample sites are indicated in the top row and the number of haplotypes (n), number of sequenced haplotypes (s), haplotype diversity (hd), nucleotide diversity (π), and number of substitutions (ns) are indicated for each species.

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Minimum spanning network of mtDNA haplotypes for the (A) ten populations of H. depressus (291 individuals) and (B) six populations of H. missouriensis (175 individuals). Colors correspond to the three sampling regions: grey for A, white for B and black for C (fig. 1). For each circle representing an observed haplotype, there is a sample site and haplotype identifier. The size of each circle is scaled to its relative haplotype frequency according to the SSCP survey. Small black circles indicate unsampled intermediate haplotypes. The haplotype (A2:B1:B7:B10.h03) contained in a box have been detected in four populations. (C) Representation of the distribution of the 42 haplotypes among the ten H. depressus populations studied within the minimum spanning network.

Figure 5

Table 3. Hierarchical analyses of the genetic diversity of H. depressus and H. missouriensis populations. Groups were defined by geographic region (A, B, and C; fig. 1) for H. depressus without the B10 and B11 sites (see Results: Population diversity section). Two groups were defined by infection statue of H. missouriensis by Wolbachia.

Figure 6

Table 4. Number of H. missouriensis individuals infected with Wolbachia.

Figure 7

Table 5. Comparison within and among trophic levels, information on the third trophic level were obtained in this study and information on the first and second trophic levels came from previously published studies.

File 77.3 KB
File 67.4 KB