Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T10:56:34.897Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Morpho-agronomic traits variability, allelic polymorphism and diversity analysis of African yam bean: towards improving utilization and germplasm conservation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2021

David Adedayo Animasaun*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Ilorin, P. M. B. 1515, Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria
Vincent Ochos Adikwu
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Ilorin, P. M. B. 1515, Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria
Gabriel Ameh Alex
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Ilorin, P. M. B. 1515, Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria
Tomi Philips Akinsunlola
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Ilorin, P. M. B. 1515, Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria
Olabisi Fatimo Adekola
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Ilorin, P. M. B. 1515, Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria
Ramar Krishnamurthy
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Ilorin, P. M. B. 1515, Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria C.G. Bhakta Institute of Biotechnology, Uka Tarsadia University, Bardoli, Surat District, Gujarat, India
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: animasaun.ad@unilorin.edu.ng
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study assessed the genetic diversity of African yam bean (AYB) accessions using morphological and molecular markers. The accessions were grown, and morphological data collected were subjected to analysis of variance and multivariate analyses. Genomic DNA extracted from the accessions were amplified with inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. The diversity analysis was conducted using MEGA4 software. The accessions varied significantly (P < 0.05) in growth, flowering and seed-related parameters. Flowering commenced early in most accessions. Weight of 100-seed range from 15.01 to 21.15 g with the mean value of 18.30 g. Significant correlations existed between stem height, the number of leaves and leaf dimensions. Also, days to flowering correlated with pod formation; likewise, seed dimension had a positive association with seed weight. The principal biplot revealed that two components accounted for 41.77% of the observed variation. Analysis of the electropherogram showed 95 loci comprising 1351 alleles were detected by the ISSR markers with 65.26% polymorphism and combined polymorphic information content of 0.85. The principal coordinate analysis placed accessions together on a plane based on their spatial relationship. The dendrogram showed accession pairs (TSs-77, TSs-95) and (TSs-111, TSs-84) are closely related. The phylogram identified three kinships with a total length of 454. Accession TSs-115 is likely the progenitor while TSs-82 and TSs-86 are the most recent. The study concluded that a combination of morphological and ISSR markers is effective for the diversity study of AYB and the existing, genetic diversity in the accessions could be harnessed for its improvement, conservation and utilization.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of NIAB
Figure 0

Table 1. Growth parameters of African yam bean accessions evaluated for variability and genetic diversity at 12 weeks after sowing

Figure 1

Table 2. Flower and seed-related characters of African yam bean accessions assessed for variability and genetic diversity

Figure 2

Fig 1. Correlation matrix of agronomic traits of African yam bean accessions evaluated for variability and genetic diversity showing two-tail correlations of traits. Deep blue signifies strong negative correlation, blue for negative correlation, cyan for no correlation, yellow for weak positive correlation, magenta for significant correlation at P < 0.05 (0.35–0.75 scale), and deep brown for characters that correlated at P < 0.01 (≥0.75 scale). 100-SW, 100-seed weight; LB, leaf breadth; LL, leaf length; NB, number of primary branches; NDF, number of days to flowering; NDPF, number of days to pod formation; NFC, number of flowers per cluster; NFCP, number of lower clusters per plant; NFP, number of flowers per plant; NFPDP, number of filled pods per plant; NL, number of leaves; NSP, number of seeds per pod; PDL, pod length; PDW, pod width; SD, seed diameter; SG, stem girth; SL, seed length; SL, vine length; ST, seed thickness.

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Principal component biplot analysis showing the contributions of the major components to agro morphological traits variation of African yam bean accessions. Numbers 1–16 are the accessions in the order: TSs-115, TSs-77, TSs-86, TSs-1, TSs-96, TSs-87, TSs-2, TSs-111, TSs-88, TSs-91, TSs-81, TSs-84, TSs-79, TSs-90, TSs-95 and TSs-82. SL, stem length; NL, number of leaves per plant; TLL, terminal leaf length (for the middle leaflet); TLB, terminal leaf breadth; NPB, number of primary branches; SG, stem girth at 10 cm above soil surface; ND/F, number of days to flowering; NFC/P, number of flower cluster per plant; NF/C, number of flower per cluster; NF/P, number of flower per plant; NDPF, number of days to pod formation; NFPD/P, number of filled pod per plant; PDL, pod length; PDW, pod width; NS/P, number of seed per pod; SL, seed length; ST, seed thickness; SD, seed diameter; 100-SW, 100 seed weight.

Figure 4

Table 3. Fragment amplification and percentage polymorphism information generated by inter simple sequence repeats (ISSR) markers used for the assessment of genetic diversity in African yam bean accessions

Figure 5

Fig. 3. The dendrogram using the UPGMA algorithm (Sokal and Michener, 1958) based (a) on morpho-agronomic traits, (b) microsatellite allelic polymorphism, and (c) phylogram of the combined morpho-agronomic traits and microsatellite region information of the African yam bean accessions.

Supplementary material: File

Animasaun et al. supplementary material

Animasaun et al. supplementary material

Download Animasaun et al. supplementary material(File)
File 1.5 MB