Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T08:38:32.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Does feeding on pollen grains affect the performance of Amblyseius swirskii (Acari: Phytoseiidae) during subsequent generations?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2019

Alireza Nemati*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran Biotechnology Research Institute, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran
Elham Riahi
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran
*
Author for correspondence: Alireza Nemati, Email: Alireza.nemat@ymail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Diet is a critical component of the mass-rearing of biological control agents, but the impacts of diet are not always immediately obvious and can take several generations to manifest, resulting in poor survival, reproduction, and ability to kill prey under natural conditions. Our present study aimed to investigate the performance of a commercially-reared phytoseiid mite, Amblyseius swirskii, after four (G4) and six (G6) consecutive generations on pollen grains of two plant species, as well as its ability to find and kill its natural prey, Tetranychus urticae, after long-term rearing on each diet. We found no significant difference between the two diets in intrinsic and finite rates in G4. However, both diet and generation exerted a significant influence on the fecundity of A. swirskii. By G6, females reared on almond pollen had greater net reproductive and intrinsic rate compared to those reared on maize pollen. Conversely, A. swirskii fed on maize pollen consumed fewer prey than those reared on other diets, especially at higher prey densities. The findings have important implications for developing the mass-rearing program of A. swirskii on non-prey diets. Further research must explore the suitability of almond pollen in the large-scale culture of A. swirskii.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019
Figure 0

Table 1. Different life stage duration, development time, and adult longevity (mean ± SE, in days) of Amblyseius swirskii fed in the fourth (G4) and sixth (G6) generations on two pollen diets

Figure 1

Table 2. Reproduction and reproductive periods (mean ± SE) of Amblyseius swirskii in the fourth (G4) and sixth (G6) generations on two pollen diets

Figure 2

Figure 1. Age-stage-specific survival rate (sxj) of Amblyseius swirskii in the fourth (G4) and sixth (G6) generations on two pollen diets. (a) Almond pollen/G4. (b) Almond pollen/G6. (c) Maize pollen/G4. (d) Maize pollen/G6.

Figure 3

Figure 2. Age-specific survivorship (lx), age-stage fecundity of female (fx5), and age-specific fecundity (mx) of Amblyseius swirskii in the fourth (G4) and sixth (G6) generations on two pollen diets. (a) Almond pollen/G4. (b) Almond pollen/G6. (c) Maize pollen/G4. (d) Maize pollen/G6.

Figure 4

Table 3. Population growth parameters (mean ± SE) of Amblyseius swirskii in the fourth (G4) and sixth (G6) generations on two pollen diets

Figure 5

Figure 3. The functional response (type II) of Amblyseius swirskii from three strains (T, A, and M) on different densities of Tetranychus urticae. (a) Strain A: the mass-reared predator on the almond pollen. (b) Strain T: the mass-reared predator on T. urticae. (c) Strain M: the mass-reared predator on the maize pollen.

Figure 6

Table 4. Maximum-likelihood estimates from logistic regression of the proportion of Tetranychus urticae nymphs consumed by different strains of Amblyseius swirskii as a function of initial prey density

Figure 7

Table 5. Estimate (±SE) of instantaneous attack rate and handling time of three strains of Amblyseius swirskii on nymphs of Tetranychus urticae using the Rogers type II model

Figure 8

Table 6. General linear model indicating the effect of strains (either the mass-reared predator on the almond pollen or T. urticae or the maize pollen) and prey densities (2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128) on prey consumption of Amblyseius swirskii

Figure 9

Table 7. Daily consumption (mean ± SE) of Tetranychus urticae nymphs by three strains of Amblyseius swirskii at different prey densities