Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T04:29:12.446Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of in utero conditions on adult feeding preferences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2012

A. K. Portella
Affiliation:
Núcleo de Estudos da Saúde da Criança e do Adolescente (NESCA), Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
E. Kajantie
Affiliation:
Children's Hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Department of Chronic Disease Prevention, Diabetes Prevention Unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
P. Hovi
Affiliation:
Children's Hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Department of Chronic Disease Prevention, Diabetes Prevention Unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
M. Desai
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Torrance, California, USA
M. G. Ross
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Torrance, California, USA
M. Z. Goldani
Affiliation:
Núcleo de Estudos da Saúde da Criança e do Adolescente (NESCA), Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
T. J. Roseboom
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
P. P. Silveira*
Affiliation:
Núcleo de Estudos da Saúde da Criança e do Adolescente (NESCA), Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
*
*Address for correspondence: P. P. Silveira, Departamento de Pediatria, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Ramiro Barcelos, 2350, Largo Eduardo Zaccaro Faraco, 90035-903 Porto Alegre, Brazil. (Email 00032386@ufrgs.br)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The fetal or early origins of adult disease hypothesis states that environmental factors, particularly nutrition, act in early life to program the risks for chronic diseases in adult life. As eating habits can be linked to the development of several diseases including obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease, it could be proposed that persistent food preferences across the life-span in people who were exposed to an adverse fetal environment may partially explain their increased risk to develop metabolic disease later in life. In this paper, we grouped the clinical and experimental evidence demonstrating that the fetal environment may impact the individual's food preferences. In addition, we review the feeding preferences development and regulation (homeostatic and hedonic pathways, the role of taste/olfaction and the reward/pleasure), as well as propose mechanisms linking early life conditions to food preferences later in life. We review the evidence suggesting that in utero conditions are associated with the development of specific food preferences, which may be involved in the risk for later disease. This may have implications in terms of public health and primary prevention during early ages.

Information

Type
Review
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the International Society for Developmental Origins of Health and Disease 2012
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Brief schematic outlining the regulation of food preferences. Red – predominantly centrally mediated influences. Green – predominantly peripherally mediated (adipose tissue, pancreas, gastrointestinal tract and hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal axis) influences. Blue – environmental influences. Fetal life adversities can affect any of the pathways, except for environmental factors (although they could be a cause of fetal adversity).

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Conceptual framework depicting the fetal programming of food preferences proposal. Human evidence of feeding preferences in individuals exposed to fetal adversities suggests that the choices for specific types of foods at different times during the life course may play an important role in the increased risk for disease largely described in these subjects. IUGR, intrauterine growth restricted.