Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-6grmk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T05:11:48.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Substrate-perforated and compact ultra-wideband antenna with WLAN band rejection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

Wessam Zayd Shareef
Affiliation:
Wireless and Photonics Research Centre, Department of Computer and Communication Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia. Phone: +6017 3939 414
Alyani Ismail
Affiliation:
Institute of Advanced Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia
Adam R.H. Alhawari*
Affiliation:
Wireless and Photonics Research Centre, Department of Computer and Communication Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia. Phone: +6017 3939 414
*
Corresponding author: Adam R.H. Alhawari Email: adamreda@upm.edu.my
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents a designed notched band ultra-wideband (UWB) printed antenna using coplanar waveguide-fed configuration. Simple technique of perforating the substrate and modifying the ground plane and radiator patch was used to achieve UWB for the designed antenna at smaller structure. Narrow arch-shaped slot was introduced to the patch of the proposed antenna to obtain the band rejection function around the 5.4 GHz frequency to avoid the interference with WLAN applications. The proposed antenna was fabricated and the measurement result is found in well agreement with the simulation result. In addition to the acquirable UWB bandwidth, the designed antenna is capable to exhibit high radiation efficiency and omni-directional pattern.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2014 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Configuration of the proposed antenna: (a) prospective view and (b) its parameters.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Simulated return loss of two antennas with the rectangular and half ellipse-shaped ground planes.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Electric field distribution: (a) without substrate holes and (b) with substrate holes.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Simulated return loss of two antennas with and without substrate holes.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Surface current distribution at 5.4 GHz: (a) without patch slot and (b) with patch slot.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Simulated return loss of two antennas with and without patch slot.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Simulated return loss with different values of R6.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. The number of the substrate holes effect on the designed antenna.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. The diameter of the substrate holes effect.

Figure 9

Fig. 10. Simulated return loss for different values of m4.

Figure 10

Fig. 11. Simulated return loss for different values of (a) m5 and (b) m6.

Figure 11

Fig. 12. Photograph of the fabricated antenna.

Figure 12

Fig. 13. Simulated and measured return loss result.

Figure 13

Table 1. Optimized dimensions of the proposed antenna.

Figure 14

Fig. 14. Radiation efficiency.

Figure 15

Fig. 15. Gain of the proposed antenna.

Figure 16

Fig. 16. Radiation pattern at: (a) 4 GHz, (b) 7 GHz, (c) 9 GHz, and (d) 10.5 GHz.