Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T01:09:46.532Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Clay Material of an Eocene Deposit (Khanguet Rheouis, Tunisia): Identification Using Geochemical and Mineralogical Characterization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Fathi Allouche
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Géoressources, Matériaux, Environnements et Changements Globaux, LR13ES23, Faculté des Sciences de Sfax, Université de Sfax, BP1171, Sfax 3000, Tunisie
Mabrouk Eloussaief*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Recherche ‘Eau, Energie et Environnement’ (LR3E, code LR99ES35), Ecole Nationale d’Ingénieurs de Sfax, Université de Sfax, BP W, 3038 Sfax, Tunisie
Sana Ghrab
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Recherche ‘Eau, Energie et Environnement’ (LR3E, code LR99ES35), Ecole Nationale d’Ingénieurs de Sfax, Université de Sfax, BP W, 3038 Sfax, Tunisie
Nejib Kallel
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Géoressources, Matériaux, Environnements et Changements Globaux, LR13ES23, Faculté des Sciences de Sfax, Université de Sfax, BP1171, Sfax 3000, Tunisie
*
*E-mail address of corresponding author: eloussaiefmabrouk@yahoo.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite the numerous studies on geomaterials in Tunisia, quite a few clay varieties are not yet well defined. In fact no detailed geological, mineralogical, or geochemical characterizations of Tunisian palygorskite deposits have been carried out to date. The purpose of the present work was to study the continental Eocene clay deposit at the southern end of the Tunisian North axis, between Jebel Rheouis and Jebel Boudinar, to determine its potential as a clay reserve. Nine samples were collected from the Cherahil formation representing the lower, middle, and upper levels. The analytical results obtained using several techniques (chemical analysis, X-ray diffraction, specific surface area measurements, Fourier-Transform infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy) revealed that palygorskite is the dominant clay mineral. Dolomite and quartz are present as associated minerals. Chemical analysis of sample AR9 showed a smaller potassium content compared to other samples. Sample AR9 consists essentially of dolomite associated with palygorskite and quartz. Other samples (AR5, AR6, and AR7) collected from the same Cherahil formation contained palygorskite as the main phyllosilicate mineral (80%). The important reserve of palygorskite was found in the middle of the Cherahil formation. Dolomite and quartz associated with palygorskite reduced the length and crystallinity of the fibrous clay morphology. Analysis by scanning electron microscopy proved that the crystallinity of palygorskite was less in the lower and upper parts of the Cherahil formation. The central palygorskite deposit may be of interest for pharmaceutical (adsorbent drug) and other applications. The two other levels of Cherahil formation are mineralogically heterogeneous and considered economically less important than the middle level, which is rich in palygorskite.

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Clay Minerals Society 2020
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Location and simplified geological map of Khanguet Rheouis.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Lithological description of Khanguet Rheouis.

Figure 2

Table 1 Chemical composition (wt.%) of samples.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Chemical composition correlated with the locations of the samples collected.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. XRD patterns of total rock (TR) and oriented aggregates: normal (N), glycolated (G) and heated, at 550°C (H), of representative sample (AR6)

Figure 5

Table 2 Mineralogical composition of samples.

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Mineralogical variation of Cherahil formation samples in the CA and CB sections.

Figure 7

Fig. 6. N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms of sample AR6 from the Cherahil formation.

Figure 8

Table 3 Specific surface area (SBET), pore volume (Vp), and pore diameter (Ps) of representative sample AR6.

Figure 9

Fig. 7. FTIR spectra of representative sample AR6.

Figure 10

Fig. 8. SEM images (D: Dolomite, P: Palygorskite) showing the morphology of the samples collected from the Cherahil formation.

Figure 11

Table 4 EDX microanalyses of samples AR1, AR3, AR6, and AR7′.