Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T16:43:46.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of plane boundary proximity on the Honji instability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2018

Chengwang Xiong
Affiliation:
School of Civil Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China School of Civil, Environmental and Mining Engineering, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
Liang Cheng*
Affiliation:
School of Civil, Environmental and Mining Engineering, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia DUT-UWA Joint Research Centre, State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, No. 2 Linggong Road, Dalian 116024, China
Feifei Tong
Affiliation:
School of Civil, Environmental and Mining Engineering, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
Hongwei An
Affiliation:
School of Civil, Environmental and Mining Engineering, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
*
†Email address for correspondence: liang.cheng@uwa.edu.au

Abstract

This paper presents a numerical investigation of oscillatory flow around a circular cylinder that is placed in proximity to a plane boundary that is parallel to the cylinder axis. The onset and development of the Honji instability are studied over a range of Stokes numbers ($\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$) and gap-to-diameter ratios ($e/D$) at a fixed Keulegan–Carpenter number ($KC=2$). Four flow regimes are identified in the ($e/D,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$)-plane: (I) featureless two-dimensional flow, (II) stable Honji vortex, (III) unstable Honji vortex and (IV) chaotic flow. As $e/D$ increases from $-0.5$ (embedment) to $1$, the critical Stokes number $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}_{cr}$ for the onset of the Honji instability follows two side-by-side convex functions, peaking at the connection point of $e/D=0.125$ and reaching troughs at $e/D=0$ and 0.375. The Honji instability is always initiated on the gap side of the cylinder surface for $0.375\leqslant e/D\leqslant 2$ and occurs only on the top side for $-0.5\leqslant e/D<0.125$. The location for the initiation of the Honji instability switches from the gap side to the top side of the cylinder surface for $0.125<e/D<0.375$. No Honji instability is observed at $e/D=0.125$, where the flow three-dimensionality is developed through a different flow mechanism. Consistently, the three-dimensional kinetic energy of the flow, which represents a measure of the strength of flow three-dimensionality, varies with $e/D$ in a trend opposite to that of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}_{cr}$. Three physical mechanisms are identified as being responsible for the observed variation trend of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}_{cr}$ with $e/D$ and for various flow phenomena, which are the blockage effect induced by the geometry setting, the existence of the Stokes layer on the plane boundary and the favourable pressure gradient in the flow direction over the gap between the cylinder and the plane surface.

Information

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© 2018 Cambridge University Press 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of a circular cylinder placed close to a plane boundary. The oscillatory flow is aligned with the $x$-axis, which is parallel to the plane and perpendicular to the axis of the cylinder (defined as the $z$-axis). $L_{x}$, $L_{y}$ and $L_{z}$ represent the dimensions of the computational domain in the $x$-,$y$- and $z$-directions, respectively.

Figure 1

Figure 2. (a) A typical 2-D structured $h$-type mesh at $e/D=0.5$, with (b) a close-up view of the $hp$-type mesh near the cylinder at the Lagrange interpolate order $N_{p}=8$, where the nodal points of the spectral elements are determined from the zeros of the Gauss–Lobatto–Legendre polynomials (Karniadakis & Sherwin 2013).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Vortex iso-surfaces around an isolated cylinder for$(KC,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD})=(2,200)$ at $t/T=100$.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Comparison of the predicted critical $KC$ number (a) and wavelength (b) for the Honji instability of an isolated cylinder with results published in the literature. Hall (1984) line: $KC_{h}=5.788\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}^{-1/4}(1+0.205\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}^{-1/4})$, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{h}/D=6.95\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}^{-1/2}$; Sarpkaya (2002) line: $KC_{s}=12.5\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}^{-2/5}$, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{s}/D=22\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}^{-3/5}$.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Comparison of instantaneous iso-surfaces of $x$-vorticity of the critical 3-D instability for an isolated cylinder at $(KC,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD},k)=(2.58,80,5.88)$ between (a) Elston et al. (2006) and (b) the present study. The arrow indicates the direction of flow oscillation.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Critical Stokes number $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}_{cr}$ (a) and the corresponding spanwise wavelength $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{cr}/D$ (b) as a function of gap ratios for the onset of the Honji instability at $KC=2$ (solid lines). The thick dashed line represents the extrapolation based on the data points at $e/D=0.125$. The horizontal dotted line denotes the value for an isolated cylinder, and vertical dotted lines running through $e/D=0$ and $0.125$ are provided for reference.

Figure 6

Figure 7. Comparison of instantaneous vorticity contours based on 2-D DNS at $e/D=0.125$. (a) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}=160$, (b) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}=200$ and (c) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}=210$. Two instants are given at $t/T=150$ (top) and $150.5$ (bottom).

Figure 7

Figure 8. Comparison of profiles of peak velocity components against $y/D$ for different gap ratios at $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}=150$ from 2-D base flow $\boldsymbol{U}$: (a) at the gap side and (b) at the top free-stream side. They are sampled along the line at $x=0$ during one cycle of oscillation (thus, the peak velocities do not necessarily occur at the same time instant).

Figure 8

Figure 9. Comparison of instantaneous $x$-vorticity iso-surfaces of the critical 3-D instability for (a) $e/D=\infty$, (b) $1$, (c) $0.25$ and (d) $-0.5$. Three spanwise repetitions are illustrated at the instant of $t_{0}=0$.

Figure 9

Figure 10. Variation of pressure drop between sampling points A and B as a function of gap ratio at $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}=140$.

Figure 10

Figure 11. Contours of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{z}$ of the base flow and instantaneous kinetic energy of the leading eigenmode at (a) $(e/D,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD},\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D)=(\infty ,140,0.739)$, (b) $(1,130,0.785)$, (c) $(0.375,105,1.047)$, (d) $(0.25,150,0.739)$, (e) $(0.03125,80,0.967)$ and (f) $(-0.5,190,0.628)$. No colour legend is given for kinetic energy because the eigenmodes are normalised by setting the value of integration over the domain equal to 1, but a dark colour still corresponds to higher energy and light colour corresponds to lower energy.

Figure 11

Figure 12. Regime map in $(e/D,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD})$-plane at $KC=2$ based on the formation of Honji vortices on the top and gap sides of the cylinder. The status on the top or gap side of the cylinder is detected by probe lines at $(x,y)=(0,\pm 0.51D)$, and each is represented by a half-marker in the legend. The solid line was reproduced from the marginal curve in figure 6 for comparison, while the dashed marginal line is estimated from the 3-D DNS results. The arrows and sequence numbers denote that the parameters are discussed specifically in §§ 3.3.1–3.3.4, respectively.

Figure 12

Figure 13. Comparison of iso-surfaces of $Q=0.25$ (yellow) and $x$-vorticity $\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{x}=\pm 0.5$ (translucent in red and blue) at $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}=150$ at phase $t_{0}=0$.

Figure 13

Figure 14. Comparison of profiles of peak velocity components against $y/D$ for different gap ratios at $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}=150$: (a) at the gap side and (b) at the top side. Velocity components are sampled along the line at $x=0$ during one cycle of oscillation.

Figure 14

Figure 15. (a,b) Comparison of characteristic normalised wavenumber $m$ by $w$-velocity obtained along two probe lines, where the fast Fourier transform (FFT) results are averaged after $t/T=20$; (c) the spectrum square root of mean modal kinetic energy; (d) the phase variation of square root of overall 3-D ($k\not =0$) kinetic energy during one cycle obtained by phase averaging; (e) comparison of mean overall kinetic energy; and (f) effective wavelength. All the results are at $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}=150$.

Figure 15

Figure 16. Temporal and spatial evolution of the $w$-velocity component sampled at $t_{0}/T=0.25$ along lines of $(x,y)=(0,0.51D)$ (a–f) and $(0,-0.51D)$ (g–l) for the case with $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}=250$ at different gap ratios.

Figure 16

Figure 17. Iso-surfaces of $Q$-criterion, $Q=0.25$, at $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}=250$ at $t_{0}=0$ for different gap ratios.

Figure 17

Figure 18. Comparison of characteristic normalised wavenumber $m$ of $w$-velocity component (a) and (b), and (c) spectrum and (d) phase variation of square root of kinetic energy at fixed $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}=250$ and different gap ratios, which are the counterparts of figure 15(a–d).

Figure 18

Figure 19. Vorticity iso-surfaces (a–d) and contour $0.05\leqslant \unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{x}\leqslant 0.05$ at $x=0$ (e–h) with $e/D=0.375$ at $t/T=100$. (a,e) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}=125$, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{x}=\pm 0.05$; (b,f) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}=150$, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{x}=\pm 0.1$; (c,g) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}=200$, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{x}=\pm 0.2$; and (d,h) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}=250$, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{x}=\pm 0.5$.

Figure 19

Figure 20. Comparison of characteristic wavenumber $k$ by $w$-velocity (a) and (b), and (c) spectrum and (d) phase variation of square root of kinetic energy at fixed $e/D=0.375$ but different $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$, which are counterparts of figure 18.

Figure 20

Figure 21. Comparison of iso-surfaces of $Q$-criterion $Q=0.25$ at $t_{0}=0$ for different Stokes numbers at $e/D=0.125$. The supplementary $\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{z}$ vorticity contours $-1\leqslant \unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{z}\leqslant 1$ are plotted on $z=0$.

Figure 21

Figure 22. The instantaneous iso-surfaces of $Q$-criterion $Q=0.25$ along with the translucent iso-surfaces of $x$-vorticity $\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{x}=\pm 0.4$ at $e/D=0.125$ and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}=230$.

Figure 22

Figure 23. Comparison of iso-surfaces of $Q$-criterion $Q=0.25$ at $t_{0}=0$ at $e/D=0.125$ and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}=250$ with slip plane boundary condition (SPB). The supplementary $\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{z}$ vorticity contours $-1\leqslant \unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{z}\leqslant 1$ are plotted on $z=0$.

Figure 23

Figure 24. The residual of momentum and continuity equation at different interpolate order $N_{p}$ for $(e/D,KC,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD})=(0.5,2,250)$ at $t/T=100.25$.

Figure 24

Table 1. $N_{p}$-convergence results for a circular cylinder at $(e/D,KC,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD})=(0.5,2,250)$, including the peak of in-line coefficients ($C_{I}$), drag and inertia coefficients ($C_{D}$ and $C_{M}$) and the root-mean-square (r.m.s.) of the lift coefficients ($C_{L}$).

Figure 25

Figure 25. The instantaneous lift force coefficient $C_{L}$ at $(e/D,KC,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD})=(0.125,2,250)$ at different interpolate orders $N_{p}$.

Figure 26

Figure 26. The velocity profiles of $u$ and $v$ along $x=0$ at the instant $t/T=100.25$ for $(e/D,KC,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD})=(0.125,2,250)$ at different interpolate orders $N_{p}$.

Figure 27

Figure 27. The comparison of Floquet multipliers for $e/D=0.25$ and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}=150$ at different interpolate orders $N_{p}$.

Figure 28

Table 2. Comparison of the results for the inertia and drag coefficients with previous experimental and numerical studies. Tests 1–4 are for isolated cylinder and 5–7 are for $e/D=0.5$. Exp., experimental; Num., numerical.

Figure 29

Figure 28. Comparison of characteristic normalised wavenumber $m$ of $w$-velocity component for spanwise resolution at $(e/D,KC,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD})=(0.25,2,250)$ and $L_{z}/D=5.6$.