doi: 10.1557/jmr.2011.128, Published online by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Materials Research Society, 1 June 2011.
A critical error appears in the Abstract, in Figs. 4 and 7, and in Sec. III and IV of the article.
The unit 10-5Pa-0.5 is incorrect.
The correct unit should be 10-6Pa-0.5.
The authors regret this error.
Figure of merit of (Pb0.87−0.07xBa0.10+0.07x)La0.02 (Zr0.7Sn0.15Ti0.15)O3 ceramics with the variation of temperature and Pb0.80La0.02Ba0.17(Zr0.70Sn0.15Ti0.15)O3 content under a 400 V/mm dc bias field. (color online)
Figure of merit of (Pb0.87−0.07xBa0.10+0.07x)La0.02(Zr0.7Sn0.15Ti0.15)O3 specimens with x = 0.65 as a function of temperature and applied dc bias field. (color online)

