Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T07:58:12.033Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bulge fatigue testing of freestanding and supported gold films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2014

Benoit Merle*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Institute I, Martensstr. 5, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany
Mathias Göken
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Institute I, Martensstr. 5, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: benoit.merle@fau.de

Abstract

The bulge test was used to investigate the fatigue properties of gold thin films with a thickness between 100 and 300 nm. The membranes were pressurized at a rate of 0.2 Hz up to 105 times, during which their stress and strain states were continuously recorded. Gold films on a silicon nitride substrate were cyclically loaded into tension and compression. Due to the presence of the substrate, no membrane failure was observed, but the residual stress shifted from an initially tensile state to an increasingly compressive one. Typical fatigue damage mechanisms consisting of extrusions were found in some large grains. Freestanding films were cyclically loaded in pure tension until failure occurred. The data acquired during the fatigue tests show a strong ratcheting of the films, which is indicative of cyclic plastic creep. Microstructural investigations clearly show grain boundary sliding in very thin films with columnar grains extending through the thickness.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 
Figure 0

FIG. 1. Schematic of the central section of a long rectangular membrane during bulge testing: (a) single layer and (b) bilayer membrane.

Figure 1

FIG. 2. Quantitative evaluation of the fatigue test of a 100 nm SiNx film at 0.2 Hz and 50 kPa: (a) plane-stress modulus and residual stress evolution; (b) stress–strain loops for every 10,000th cycle (the first cycle is skipped as it corresponds to the initial monotonic-like deformation).

Figure 2

FIG. 3. Quantitative evaluation of the fatigue test for a 100 nm gold film on SiNx at 0.2 Hz and 100 kPa: (a) plane-stress modulus and residual stress evolution and (b) stress–strain loops for every 5000th cycle.

Figure 3

FIG. 4. Topography of a 120-nm-thick gold layer on SiNx investigated by AFM: (a) before fatigue testing, (b) after 290,000 cycles at Δp = 50 kPa, and (c) backscattered electron image taken before testing, showing the underlying microstructure.

Figure 4

FIG. 5. Localized damage formation during fatigue testing of supported gold films with different thicknesses. (a and b) Hillock and whisker formation in a 100 nm gold film and (c and d) extrusions in very large grains of a 300-nm-thick gold film.

Figure 5

FIG. 6. Quantitative evaluation of the fatigue test of a 230 nm freestanding gold film at 0.2 Hz and 50 kPa until failure after 34,058 cycles: (a) plane-stress modulus evolution, (b) stress–strain loops for every 2000th cycle, (c) corresponding stress and strain ranges, and (d) mean strain σxx during each hysteresis loop.

Figure 6

FIG. 7. SEM images of the surface: (a) before testing and (b) after 25,000 cycles, grains become visible in the topography.

Figure 7

FIG. 8. SEM images after 70,000 cycles showing sink-in deformation of grains: (a and c) secondary electron contrast and (b and d) backscattered electron contrast.

Figure 8

FIG. 9. AFM micrograph showing the sink-in of a grain after 70,000 cycles (a) and the corresponding cross-profile (b).

Figure 9

FIG. 10. Electron microscopic and focused ion beam investigation of grain boundary sliding. (a) Top view of the surface and (b) cross-section showing a step on both sides of the film (grain boundaries visible from secondary electron contrast have been highlighted).

Figure 10

TABLE I. Comparison of the main fatigue testing parameters for the freestanding and supported films discussed throughout the article. The values are related to the last cycles of the tests.