Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T22:29:17.158Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Significance of compositional zoning in cumulate chromites of the Kabanga chonoliths, Tanzania

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2018

David M. Evans*
Affiliation:
Scientific Associate, Department of Earth Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom 21 rue Jean de la Bruyère, 78000 Versailles, France
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Compositional zoning is observed rarely in chrome-spinel grains from slowly-cooled layered intrusions because diffusion of cations continues within the spinel to low temperatures. However, in certain circumstances, such gradational zoning of both divalent and trivalent cations is observed and may be useful in deciphering the thermal history of the host intrusions. The accessory chrome-spinels of the Kabanga mafic-ultramafic chonolith intrusions of the Kibaran igneous event in north western Tanzania are notable because they have preserved gradational compositional zoning. This zoning is demonstrated to predate and be independent of later hydrous alteration of the silicate assemblage. At Kabanga, most chrome-spinel grains within olivine-rich cumulate rocks are gradationally and cryptically zoned from Fe2+-Cr3+ rich cores to more Mg2+-Al3+ rich rims (normal zoning). A few grains are zoned from Mg2+-Al3+ rich cores to more Fe2+-Cr3+ rich rims (reverse zoned). The zoning of divalent cations is proportional to that of trivalent cations with Mg2+ following Al3+ and Fe2+ following Cr3+ from core to rim. The zoning of trivalent and tetravalent cations is interpreted to be caused by either new growth from an evolving melt or peritectic reactions between evolved or contaminated melt and adjacent Al-Cr-bearing ferromagnesian minerals, which is preserved by relatively rapid initial cooling in the small chonolith intrusions. Divalent cation zoning is controlled by sub-solidus exchange of Fe2+ and Mg with adjacent ferromagnesian minerals and continues to lower temperatures, indicated to be 580 to 630°C by the spinel-olivine geothermometer. Preservation of such zoning is more likely in the smaller chonolith intrusions that typically host magmatic nickel-copper sulfide deposits and can be used as an exploration indicator when interpreting chromite compositions in regional heavy indicator mineral surveys.

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2018 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Geological sketch map of the Kabanga intrusions (after Evans et al., 1999 and Maier et al., 2010), showing location of drill holes used in the study and the position of cross-section X–Y. Upper inset: Location of Kabanga in Tanzania (Ta) and neighbouring countries. B = Burundi, R = Rwanda, Ke = Kenya, Za = Zambia. Lower inset: cross section X–Y showing location of samples on projected drill hole traces (B.o.W is base of weathering).

Figure 1

Table 1. List of samples used in this study*.

Figure 2

Table 2. Standard minerals analysed during the study.

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Reflected light photomicrographs of representative textures of chromite at Kabanga: (a) euhedral chromite included within unaltered olivine, P1-19-506 m, spot 05; (b) euhedral chromite within partly serpentinized olivine, sample KN92-33-265 m spot 01; (c) euhedral chromite and rounded olivine within orthopyroxene oikocryst, sample KN92-26-164 m spot 06; (d) a chain of subhedral chromite grains within interstitial clinopyroxene, sample P1-19-506 m spot 04; (e) euhedral and subhedral chromites partly enclosed within phlogopite and showing complete myrmekitic texture where fully enclosed by phlogopite and partial myrmekitic texture (castellated margin) where partly enclosed within an embayment in orthopyroxene, sample P6-11B-160 m spot 15; (f) euhedral chromite grain within clinopyroxene, showing speckling due to exsolution of very fine ilmenite lamellae (under oil immersion), sample P1-19-506 m spot 13. Igneous mineral abbreviations: Cr chromite, Cpx clinopyroxene, Opx orthopyroxene, Ol olivine, Pl plagioclase, Phl phlogopite, Po pyrrhotite; alteration mineral abbreviations: cl chlorite, pmp pumpellyite, se serpentine, tr tremolite.

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Back-scattered electron images of chromites showing gradational compositional zoning: (a) euhedral chromite within orthopyroxene oikocryst enhanced to emphasize zoning in orthopyroxene around the chromite, sample KN92-26-164 m, spot 17; (b) cluster of subhedral chromites within orthopyroxene oikocryst and showing weak castellated rim at top right corner adjacent to phlogopite, sample KN92-26-164 m, spot 03; (c) subhedral chromite with weak reverse zoning within olivine, sample P1-19-506 m, spot 09; (d) large subhedral grain at interface between orthopyroxene and sulfide, rimmed by narrow band of phlogopite adjacent to the orthopyroxene, sample KN92-26-164 m, spot 05. The location of the analysis profiles A–A’, B–B’, C–C’ and D–D’ are shown; mineral abbreviations as in Fig. 2.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Major-element ratios of chromite cores from sample P1-19-506 m only – each point represents the core analysis of an individual grain to illustrate intergrain variation: (a) and (b) classified by mineral host; (c) and (d) classified by grain size. The regression of high-temperature chromites in equilibrium with olivines of composition Fo87–88 in primitive volcanic rocks (Kamenetsky et al. 2001) is shown as a dashed line in (a).

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Minor-element compositions of individual chromite cores from sample P1-19-506 m, plotted against Mg# ratio to illustrate intergrain variation. NiO levels were also analysed but show considerable scatter around the detection limit (0.05 wt%).

Figure 7

Fig. 6. EPMA X-ray element images for chromite grains shown in Fig. 3: (a) Cr and (b) Al for sample KN92-26-164 m Spot-17A (compare with Fig. 3a, grain A in Fig. 7a); (c) Cr and (d) Ti for sample KN92-26-164 m Spot-03 (c.f. Fig. 3b, grain J in Fig. 7a); (e) Cr and (f) Ti for sample KN92-26-164 m Spot-05 (c.f. Fig. 3d, grain V in Fig. 7d). Scale bar is 0.2 mm in all images.

Figure 8

Fig. 7. Intragrain variation of individual chromite grains showing cores (solid-filled symbols) linked to their rims (open symbols) classified by their grain size: (a) mainly normal-sense zoning of unreacted (TiO2-poor) chromites contained in orthopyroxene oikocrysts; (b) reverse and normal-sense zoning of chromites enclosed within olivines; (c) mainly normal-sense zoning of reacted (TiO2-rich) chromites in interstitial orthopyroxene, clinopyroxene and plagioclase; (d) composite zoning shown by some chromite grains interstitial to silicates and adjacent to sulfide blebs. The dashed oblique lines in (a) and (b) are the regression lines of volcanic chromites in equilibrium with olivine of given compositions from Kamenetsky et al. (2001). The dashed oval fields represent two groups of core compositions of unreacted orthopyroxene-hosted grains in Fig. 7a, centred around grain B and grain C. Some notable individual grains are labelled by a capitalized letter referring to a label in Appendix 1 (Supplementary material, Table A1).

Figure 9

Fig. 8. EPMA compositional profiles A–A’ shown on Fig. 3a: (a) major-element formula units (for four oxygens in spinel, six oxygens in pyroxene) less the average across the whole grain (calculated separately for chromite and orthopyroxene); (b) minor-element formula units.

Figure 10

Fig. 9. EPMA compositional profiles B–B’ shown on Fig. 3b: (a) major-element formula units (for four oxygens in spinel, six oxygens in pyroxene) less the average across the whole grain (calculated separately for chromite and orthopyroxene); (b) minor-element formula units.

Figure 11

Fig. 10. EPMA compositional profiles C–C’ shown on Fig. 3c: (a) major-element formula units (for four oxygens in spinel, four oxygens in olivine) less the average across the whole grain (calculated separately for chromite and olivine); (b) minor-element formula units.

Figure 12

Fig. 11. EPMA compositional profiles D–D’ shown on Fig. 3d: (a) major-element formula units (for four oxygens in spinel, six oxygens in pyroxene) less the average across the whole grain (calculated separately for chromite and orthopyroxene); (b) minor-element formula units.

Figure 13

Fig. 12. EPMA compositional profiles in olivine adjacent to three separate chromite grains in sample P1-19-506 m (Block 1). Small dots represent analyses of olivine adjacent to chromite of the Great Dyke from sample 62 (harzburgite of Unit 2; data of Wilson, 1982). The fine continuous line represents Wilson's diffusion model for the crystallographic b axis of olivine in sample 62.

Figure 14

Table 3. Geothermometry of chromite-olivine pairs.

Supplementary material: File

Evans supplementary material

Evans supplementary material 1

Download Evans supplementary material(File)
File 8.6 MB