Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T05:34:03.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Malarial (Plasmodium falciparum) dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase: structural basis for antifolate resistance and development of effective inhibitors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2004

Y. YUTHAVONG
Affiliation:
National Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, National Science and Technology Development Agency, Science Park, 113 Phaholyothin Road, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand
J. YUVANIYAMA
Affiliation:
Center for Protein Structure and Function and Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
P. CHITNUMSUB
Affiliation:
National Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, National Science and Technology Development Agency, Science Park, 113 Phaholyothin Road, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand
J. VANICHTANANKUL
Affiliation:
National Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, National Science and Technology Development Agency, Science Park, 113 Phaholyothin Road, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand
S. CHUSACULTANACHAI
Affiliation:
National Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, National Science and Technology Development Agency, Science Park, 113 Phaholyothin Road, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand
B. TARNCHOMPOO
Affiliation:
National Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, National Science and Technology Development Agency, Science Park, 113 Phaholyothin Road, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand
T. VILAIVAN
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
S. KAMCHONWONGPAISAN
Affiliation:
National Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, National Science and Technology Development Agency, Science Park, 113 Phaholyothin Road, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase (DHFR-TS) from Plasmodium falciparum, a validated target for antifolate antimalarials, is a dimeric enzyme with interdomain interactions significantly mediated by the junction region as well as the Plasmodium-specific additional sequences (inserts) in the DHFR domain. The X-ray structures of both the wild-type and mutant enzymes associated with drug resistance, in complex with either a drug which lost, or which still retains, effectiveness for the mutants, reveal features which explain the basis of drug resistance resulting from mutations around the active site. Binding of rigid inhibitors like pyrimethamine and cycloguanil to the enzyme active site is affected by steric conflict with the side-chains of mutated residues 108 and 16, as well as by changes in the main chain configuration. The role of important residues on binding of inhibitors and substrates was further elucidated by site-directed and random mutagenesis studies. Guided by the active site structure and modes of inhibitor binding, new inhibitors with high affinity against both wild-type and mutant enzymes have been designed and synthesized, some of which have very potent antimalarial activities against drug-resistant P. falciparum bearing the mutant enzymes.

Information

Type
Review Article
Copyright
2005 Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Ribbon diagram comparison of protein fold among three DHFR-TS from (A) Leishmania major (Knighton et al. 1994), (B) Plasmodium falciparum (Yuvaniyama et al. 2003), and (C) Cryptosporidium hominis (O'Neil et al. 2003). DHFR and TS domains are coloured red and blue, respectively, where the junction regions are in dark green. The ‘donated helices’ within the junction regions in P. falciparum and C. hominis enzymes are drawn in yellowish green. The different shades denote individual subunits, although the actual connectivity of the P. falciparum DHFR-TS is still unknown owing to invisible electron density. The grey dashed curves represent possible linkages based on intermolecular space in crystal packing. Ligands bound in active sites are drawn in various colours: dUMP in magenta, TS inhibitor CB3 in orange, NADPH in cyan, whereas MTX (in L. major), WR99210 (in P. falciparum), and folate (in C. hominis) are in yellow. Coordinates of L. major and C. hominis DHFR-TS were kindly provided by D. Matthews and A. Anderson, respectively.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (A) Enzyme–substrate interactions at the active site of the wild-type PfDHFR-TS. Dihydrofolate substrate (DHF) is coloured magenta at carbon atoms. Two water molecules (W1 and W2) important in binding of the ligand are drawn as red spheres. Four amino acid residues that are mutated in the pyrimethamine-resistant mutant are denoted with red labels. (B) Diagram of the interactions. Dashed lines indicate hydrogen bonds, while a squiggled line denotes ring-stacking interaction. The four residues responsible for pyrimethamine-resistance are bolded and underlined while other residues important in other interactions are also shown. The positions of some atoms of the substrate are assigned as numbers.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Comparisons of enzyme–inhibitor interactions at the active site: (A) between wild-type–WR99210 and double mutant–pyrimethamine complexes, and (B) between wild-type–WR99210 and quadruple mutant–WR99210 complexes. The complexes of the double mutant (A) and quadruple mutant (B) are drawn in full colour, while the wild-type complex is shown in thinner drawing with carbon atoms in black. In the mutant complexes, carbon atoms of pyrimethamine (A) and WR99210 (B) are coloured magenta, while those of the NADPH are in cyan. The two water molecules, resembling those in Fig. 2A, are drawn in red and black spheres for the mutant and wild-type complexes, respectively. The four residues responsible for pyrimethamine-resistance are labelled in red. Comparing with the wild-type complex, the double mutant-pyrimethamine complex shows significant dislocation of the nicotinamide ring of NADPH while the protein conformation is generally the same (A). Notably, the quadruple mutant shows large dislocation of the backbone conformation at residues 48–51 while the ligand binding modes are largely preserved except a shift at the trichlorophenyl ring of WR99210 (B). (C–E) Diagrams of the interactions in the double mutant (C), wild-type (D), and quadruple mutant (E) complexes use the same notations for symbols as in Fig. 2B. The positions of some atoms of the inhibitors are assigned as numbers.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. The general structures of effective inhibitors against multiple mutant PfDHFR-TS. The nucleus (light pink) is either a diaminopyrimidine or a diaminodihydrotriazine, with 2 or 3 N atoms in the ring respectively, while the side-chain is either a rigid aryl derivative (dark pink) or a flexible chain starting with a C or O atom. For diaminodihydrotriazines, the 2-position should be monosubstituted by a hydrophobic group.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. The ranges of inhibition constants (Ki) and in vitro IC50 values against Plasmodium falciparum for some cycloguanil inhibitors of wild-type and mutant PfDHFR-TSs with general structures as shown in Fig. 4, with p-Cl Ph (pink), m-Cl Ph (green), and flexible side-chains (yellow) at N-1 position. Data for cycloguanil and WR99210 are shown in deep red and deep blue respectively. (A) Ki values. (B) In vitro IC50 values against P. falciparum with the wild-type or mutant DHFR-TSs corresponding to (A), of cycloguanil derivatives with p-Cl Ph (pink), m-Cl Ph (green), and flexible side chains (yellow) at N-1 position. Data are from 12, 21 and 16 compounds in the p-Cl Ph, m-Cl Ph and flexible side chain categories respectively. Designations: P. falciparum carrying wt-DHFR-TS (TM4/8.2), C59R+S108N (K1CB1), N51I+C59R+S108N (W2), C59R+S108N+I164N (Csl-2), N51I+C59R+S108N+I164N (V1/S).