Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-6grmk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T12:46:08.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Río Chico: A Multicomponent Site Precursor of Té Zulay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2022

Ferran Cabrero*
Affiliation:
Universidad Estatal Amazónica, Puyo, Ecuador
Edwin Aguirre
Affiliation:
Museo Etnoarqueológico Municipal de Pastaza, Puyo, Ecuador,
Martha Romero
Affiliation:
Instituto Nacional de Patrimonio Cultural, Quito, Ecuador
Simon Leib
Affiliation:
Universidad Estatal Amazónica, Puyo, Ecuador
*
Corresponding autor: Ferran Cabrero. Email: fcabrero@uea.edu.ec
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This report presents survey and excavation results from the site of Río Chico, located near the city of Puyo, Ecuador. Currently, Río Chico is the oldest multicomponent village-type mound site of the Pastaza drainage, one of the great rivers of the Amazon basin. It is part of a series of monumental sites in the Upper Amazon of Ecuador but is unique in the area because of its evidence of consumption of certain plants and interregional trade.

Resumen

Resumen

Este informe presenta los resultados de la prospección y excavación del sitio de Río Chico, situado cerca de la ciudad de Puyo, Ecuador. Río Chico es el sitio monticular multicomponente tipo aldea más antiguo del río Pastaza, uno de los grandes afluentes de la cuenca del Amazonas. Forma parte de una serie de sitios monumentales de la Alta Amazonia, pero es único en la zona con evidencias de consumo de ciertas plantas y de intercambio interregional.

Information

Type
Report
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for American Archaeology
Figure 0

Figure 1. Río Chico site. (Color online)

Figure 1

Figure 2. Archaeological sites in the Ecuadorian Amazon. (Color online)

Figure 2

Figure 3. Té Zulay complex and Río Chico site. (Color online)

Figure 3

Table 1. Chronological Chart in the Upper Pastaza Valley.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Ceramic pottery fragments and spindle whorl from Río Chico: (a) rim fragment with serpentine appliqué; (b) fragment with excised decoration; (c) fragment of the corrugated style; (d) fragment with punctated rows; (e) spindle whorl; (f) fragment with a button; (g) vessel rim with excised decoration; (h–i) fragments of the corrugated style; (j) rim fragment with incised palm-shaped designs with meander or flowers; (k) fragment with excised decoration; and (l) fragment with botanical motifs. (Color online)

Figure 5

Figure 5. Small ceramic vessels in the secondary burial: (a) fine vessel with not determined period by style; (b) vessel with incisions and red-orange slip; and (c) Puruha style vessel. (Color online)

Figure 6

Figure 6. Lithic artifacts from Río Chico and vicinity: (a) ax with spikes; (b) simple ax; (c) ax with spikes; (d) ax with shrinkage; (e) simple ax with perforation or small hoe; (f) simple ax; (g) unknown artifact; and (h) simple ax. (Color online)

Figure 7

Figure 7. Identified starches (selection): (a) Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato); (b) Canna indica (Indian shot); (c) Capsicum sp. (chili pepper); (d) Smilax sp. (sarsaparilla); (e) Manihot esculenta (cassava); and (f) Oxalis tuberosa (oca). (Color online)

Figure 8

Table 2. Taxa per Sample.

Figure 9

Figure 8. Occurrence of identified starches. (Color online)