Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T05:11:06.885Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of left ventricular torsion in children with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 February 2013

Christian Prinz*
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Heart and Diabetes Centre North-Rhine Westphalia, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
Lothar Faber
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Heart and Diabetes Centre North-Rhine Westphalia, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
Dieter Horstkotte
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Heart and Diabetes Centre North-Rhine Westphalia, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
Hermann Körperich
Affiliation:
Center of Congenital Heart Disease, Heart and Diabetes Centre North-Rhine Westphalia, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
Axel Moysich
Affiliation:
Center of Congenital Heart Disease, Heart and Diabetes Centre North-Rhine Westphalia, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
Nikolaus Haas
Affiliation:
Center of Congenital Heart Disease, Heart and Diabetes Centre North-Rhine Westphalia, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
Deniz Kececioglu
Affiliation:
Center of Congenital Heart Disease, Heart and Diabetes Centre North-Rhine Westphalia, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
Kai Thorsten Laser
Affiliation:
Center of Congenital Heart Disease, Heart and Diabetes Centre North-Rhine Westphalia, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
*
Correspondence to: Dr C. Prinz, MD, Department of Cardiology, Heart and Diabetes Centre North-Rhine Westphalia, Ruhr-University Bochum, Georgstrasse 11, D-32545 Bad Oeynhausen, Germany. Tel: +49-151-15564942; Fax: +49-573197-2194; E-mail: Cchrprinz@aol.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aims

To evaluate the role of torsion in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in children.

Methods

A total of 88 children with idiopathic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n = 24) and concentric hypertrophy (n = 20) were investigated with speckle-tracking echocardiography and compared with age- and gender-matched healthy controls (n = 44).

Results

In hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, we found increased torsion (2.8 ± 1.6 versus 1.9 ± 1.0°/cm [controls], p < 0.05) because of an increase in clockwise basal rotation (−8.7 ± 4.3° versus −4.9 ± 2.5° [controls], p < 0.001) and prolonged time to peak diastolic untwisting (3.7 ± 2.4% versus 1.7 ± 0.6% [controls] of cardiac cycle, p < 0.01), but no differences in peak untwisting velocities. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients demonstrated a negative correlation between left ventricular muscle mass and torsion (r = −0.7, p < 0.001). In concentric hypertrophy, torsion was elevated because of increased apical rotation (15.1 ± 6.4° versus 10.5 ± 5.5° [controls], p < 0.05) without correlation with muscle mass. Peak untwisting velocities (− 202 ± 88 versus −145 ± 67°/s [controls], p < 0.05) were higher in concentric hypertrophy and time to peak diastolic untwisting was delayed (1.8 ± 0.8% versus 1.2 ± 0.6% [controls], p < 0.05).

Conclusions

In contrast to an increased counterclockwise apical rotation in concentric hypertrophy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is characterised by predominantly enhanced systolic basal clockwise rotation. Diastolic untwisting is delayed in both groups. Torsion may be an interesting marker to guide patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 
Figure 0

Table 1 Baseline echocardiographic data of the study patients with HCM and CH, and of the gender- and age-matched controls (LV; LV-EDD; LV-ESD; DT; LVOT-G; SAM).

Figure 1

Figure 1 (a, c) Parasternal long-axis view of massive left ventricular septal hypertrophy in HCM, systolic anterior movement of mitral valve. Short-axis view of massive left ventricular septal hypertrophy in HCM. (b, d) Basal clockwise and apical counterclockwise rotation during systole creating left ventricular torsion. Global rotational curves of the apex and bases; the white line represents the net difference = torsion. (e) Global rotation–rate curves of the apex and bases; the white line represents the net difference = torsion–rate curve (figure from Notomi et al).29 HCM = hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Figure 2

Figure 2 Difference between maximal torsion in HCM patients and healthy controls, and difference between maximal torsion in CH patients and matched controls. CH = concentric hypertrophy; HCM =hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Figure 3

Figure 3 Absolute values for rotation in HCM patients and healthy controls. Note the significant differences in basal rotation between HCM patients and healthy controls. Apical rotation values are comparable. Absolute values for rotation in CH patients and healthy controls. Note the significant differences in apical rotation between CH and controls. Basal rotation values are comparable. CH = concentric hypertrophy; HCM = hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Figure 4

Figure 4 (a) Negative correlation between left ventricular muscle mass in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and torsion, (b) no significant correlation between left ventricular muscle mass in concentric hypertrophy and torsion.