Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T05:23:37.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rise of clathrodictyid stromatoporoids during the Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event: insights from the Upper Ordovician Xiazhen Formation of South China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2022

Juwan Jeon
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology and Center for Excellence in Life and Palaeoenvironment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS), Beijing 100049, China
Kun Liang*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology and Center for Excellence in Life and Palaeoenvironment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China
Stephen Kershaw
Affiliation:
Department of Life Sciences, Brunel University, Kingston Lane, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH, UK Earth Sciences Department, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK
Jino Park
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, 24341, Republic of Korea
Mirinae Lee
Affiliation:
Division of Polar Earth-System Sciences, Korea Polar Research Institute, Incheon, 21990, Republic of Korea
Yuandong Zhang
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology and Center for Excellence in Life and Palaeoenvironment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS), Beijing 100049, China
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Clathrodictyids are the most abundant stromatoporoids in the Upper Ordovician Xiazhen Formation (middle to upper Katian) of South China. A total of nine species belonging to four clathrodictyid genera are identified in the formation, including Clathrodictyon idense Webby and Banks, 1976, Clathrodictyon cf. Cl. microundulatum Nestor, 1964, Clathrodictyon cf. Cl. mammillatum (Schmidt, 1858), Clathrodictyon megalamellatum Jeon n. sp., Clathrodictyon plicatum Webby and Banks, 1976, Ecclimadictyon nestori Webby, 1969, Ecclimadictyon undatum Webby and Banks, 1976, Camptodictyon amzassensis (Khalfina, 1960), and Labyrinthodictyon cascum (Webby and Morris, 1976). The clathrodictyid fauna in the Xiazhen Formation is very similar to those from both New South Wales and Tasmania, although the latter two Australian regions do not share any common clathrodictyid species during the Late Ordovician. The paleobiogeographic pattern indicates that the northward drift of South China resulted in a favorable environment for the migration of clathrodictyids from other peri-Gondwanan terranes to South China. In addition, these peri-Gondwanan clathrodictyid species hosted various endobionts, representing a variety of paleoecological interactions. The high abundance and species-level diversity of clathrodictyid species presumably increased the substrate availability of suitable host taxa, judging from the diverse intergrowth associations between clathrodictyids and other benthic organisms. These paleoecological interactions between stromatoporoid and other organisms are known from the Late Ordovician and became more abundant and widespread in the Siluro–Devonian. Overall, the Late Ordovician clathrodictyid assemblage in South China demonstrates one of the highest species-level diversities among all peri-Gondwanan terranes and represents a precursor of the complex, clathrodictyid-dominated communities of later metazoan reefs during the Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event.

UUID: http://zoobank.org/6063c47d-cb77-4a03-98cf-b2354656dea6

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Paleontological Society
Figure 0

Figure 1.(1) Locality of the study area in China. (2) Location of the Zhuzhai section, Yushan County, Jiangxi Province, near the border with Zhejiang Province. (3) Geological map of the Xiazhen Formation at Zhuzhai section, which is divided into three partly coeval subsections, ZU1, ZU2, and ZU3. Modified after Lee et al. (2012).

Figure 1

Figure 2.Stratigraphic column of the Xiazhen Formation with the 18 stromatoporoid-bearing intervals. The red-colored intervals (S1–S5, S7, S9–S18, and lower and upper parts of subsection ZU3) indicate where clathrodictyid stromatoporoids were found. The black-colored intervals (S6 and S8) indicate where only labechiid stromatoporoids occur. C = claystone; M = mudstone or lime mudstone; W = wackestone; P = packstone; G = grainstone, F = floatstone or framestone; R = rudstone; LLM = lower limestone member; LSM = lower shale member; MMM = middle mixed-lithology member; USM = upper shale member. Modified after Lee et al. (2012) and Park et al. (2021). A large size version of this figure is presented in Supplementary Data 1.

Figure 2

Figure 3.Lithology, interpreted depositional energy level, stratigraphic distributions of clathrodictyid stromatoporoids, and their growth forms from each stromatoporoid-bearing interval of the Xiazhen Formation; SBI = stromatoporoid-bearing interval; M = mudstone; W = wackestone; P = packstone; G = grainstone; L–S couplets = limestone–shale couplets in wackestone to packstone; F = floatstone; Fr = framestone; R = rudstone; L = low-energy depositional environment; M = medium-energy depositional environment; H = high-energy depositional environment; Cl. id. = Clathrodictyon idense; Cl. cf. mmll. = Clathrodictyon cf. Cl. mammillatum; Cl. cf. mc. = Clathrodictyon cf. Cl. microundulatum; Cl. mglm. = Clathrodictyon megalamellatum Jeon n. sp.; Cl. pl. = Clathrodictyon plicatum; E. nst. = Ecclimadictyon nestori; E. und. = Ecclimadictyon undatum; Cam. amz. = Camptodictyon amzassensis; L. csc. = Labyrinthodictyon cascum.

Figure 3

Figure 4.Thin-section photographs of Clathrodictyon idense Webby and Banks, 1976 from the S3 interval. (1) Longitudinal section of dendroid growth form of Clathrodictyon idense, NIGP 177104-1. (2, 3) Enlargements of the rectangular areas in (1), showing longitudinal section and axial part. Note sharply folded, crumpled laminae in the axial part of (3). (4) Tangential section, NIGP 177103. (5) Tangential section of single (left) and branching (right) dendroid forms of Clathrodictyon idense, NIGP 177106. Note that a thin laminar form encrusted on the branching dendroid form (right).

Figure 4

Figure 5.Holotype specimen of Clathrodictyon megalamellatum Jeon n. sp. from the S18 interval. (1, 3, 4) Longitudinal sections of Clathrodictyon megalamellatum Jeon n. sp. showing widely spaced laminae and well-developed pillars: (1) NIGP 177124-1; (3, 4) NIGP 177124-2. (2) Enlargement of the rectangular area in (1). (5–7) Tangential sections of Clathrodictyon megalamellatum Jeon n. sp. showing irregularly developed pillars with some circular structure, particularly in (5): (5, 6) NIGP 177124-1; (7) 177124-2. (8) Enlargement of the rectangular area in (4) showing astrorhizae-like structures in the mamelon-like up-growth areas.

Figure 5

Figure 6.(1) Longitudinal to tangential view of Clathrodictyon cf. Cl. mammillatum from the S18 interval, NIGP 169634. (2) Longitudinal section from the S18 interval, NIGP 177134. (3) Enlargement of the rectangular area in (2). (4) Longitudinal section of dendroid form showing sharply folded, crumpled Ecclimadictyon-like laminae in the axial part from the S9 interval, NIGP 177127-1. (5) Tangential section from the S9 interval, NIGP 177130.

Figure 6

Figure 7.(1) Longitudinal section of Clathrodictyon cf. Cl. microundulatum from the S18 interval, NIGP 177194-4. (2) Enlargement of the rectangular area in (1). (3) Enlargement of the rectangular area in (1) showing longitudinal section of a vertically developed skeletal structural tube. (4) Astrorhizal structure of Clathrodictyon cf. Cl. microundulatum from the S18 interval, NIGP 177194-13. (5) Tangential section of Clathrodictyon cf. Cl. microundulatum with intergrown Bajgolia from the S18 interval, NIGP 177194-4.

Figure 7

Figure 8.Thin-section photographs of Clathrodictyon plicatum from the S10 interval. (1) Longitudinal section of Clathrodictyon plicatum showing skeletal variation from the axial to lateral part, NIGP 177200-3. (2, 3) Enlargements of the rectangular areas in (1). Note the variation from the normal phase in the lateral phase of (2) and the sharply folded, crumpled Ecclimadictyon-like axial part of (3). (4, 5) Longitudinal and tangential sections of Clathrodictyon plicatum, respectively, NIGP 177204. (6) Sharply folded, crumpled Ecclimadictyon-like structure in the axial part in Clathrodictyon plicatum, NIGP 177205. (7) Tangential section of Clathrodictyon plicatum showing well-developed mamelons, NIGP 177213-1.

Figure 8

Figure 9.Thin-section photographs of Ecclimadictyon nestori from the S18 interval. (1) Longitudinal section, NIGP 177286. (2) Longitudinal section, NIGP 177287. (3) Tangential section, NIGP 177288.

Figure 9

Figure 10.(1, 2) Longitudinal sections of Ecclimadictyon undatum from the S15 interval: (1) NIGP 177302-1; (2) 177305. (3, 4) Tangential sections from the S15 interval: (3) NIGP 177302-7; (4) 177302-8. (5) Intergrown “Eofletcheria-like tubules” in Ecclimadictyon undatum, NIGP 177299. (6) Enlargement of the rectangular area in (5). Note that the endobionts are vertically grown, while free-living grown tubules have varying orientations in the matrix under the Ecclimadictyon skeleton.

Figure 10

Figure 11.(1–3) Longitudinal sections of Camptodictyon amzassensis from the S15 interval: (1, 2) NIGP177308-1; (3) NIGP 177308-2. (4) Tangential section of Camptodictyon amzassensis from the S15 interval, NIGP 177308-1.

Figure 11

Figure 12.(1–4) Longitudinal sections of Labyrinthodictyon cascum from the S15 interval: (1–3) NIGP 177311-1; (4) 177312-1. (5) Tangential section of Labyrinthodictyon cascum from the S15 interval, NIGP 177312-2.

Figure 12

Figure 13.Diverse paleoecological interactions among stromatoporoids and other organisms. (1) Field photograph of dendroid growth form of Clathrodictyon idense Webby and Banks, 1976 and intergrown solitary rugose coral Tryplasma. (2) Longitudinal section of Clathrodictyon cf. Cl. microundulatum and intergrown tabulate coral Catenipora, NIGP 177149-1. (3) Tangential section of Clathrodictyon cf. Cl. microundulatum and intergrown tabulate coral Catenipora, NIGP 177190. (4) Encrustation and intergrowth association among Clathrodictyon cf. Cl. mammillatum and tabulate corals Agetolites and Heliolites, NIGP 177313. Note irregular physical contacts between tabulates and stromatoporoid. Upper right is a single tube with a flat base, encrusted and partly embedded in the stromatoporoid surface. (5) Clathrodictyon idense and intergrown Tryplasma and encrusted Agetolites, NIGP 177112-10. (6) Multi-intergrowth association among Agetolites, Clathrodictyon idense, and Tryplasma, NIGP 177101. (7) Intergrowth association between Clathrodictyon megalamellatum Jeon n. sp. and Tryplasma.

Figure 13

Figure 14.Diverse paleoecological interactions among stromatoporoids and other organisms. (1) Longitudinal section of Clathrodictyon cf. Cl. microundulatum showing Bajgolia were clustered along the growth surface of the stromatoporoid and finally encrusted by Clathrodictyon cf. Cl. microundulatum, NIGP 177194-6. (2) Poorly preserved clathrodictyid stromatoporoid and the interlayering bryozoan Rhombotrypa, NIGP 177314. It is difficult to distinguish whether the bryozoan grew on a partially dead or living growth surface of the stromatoporoid, but the growth of the bryozoan was terminated by the overgrown host stromatoporoid. Note the difference in preservation between bryozoan and stromatoporoid, likely indicating different original mineralogy. (3) Unidentified tubular “Eofletcheria-like organism” in the skeleton of Ecclimadictyon undatum, NIGP 177303. Note that this endobiont is found only in Ecclimadictyon undatum. (4) Crinoid stem and encrusting Clathrodictyon plicatum with intergrown Bajgolia and Tryplasma, NIGP 177250-4. (5) Oblique section of micrite-filled, enigmatic borings in the skeleton of Ecclimadictyon nestori, NIGP 177263. (6) Paleoecological interaction between Clathrodictyon cf. Cl. mammillatum and Labechia sp., interpreted as spatial competition judging from their skeletal distortion (Jeon et al., 2020b), NIGP 169634-14.

Figure 14

Figure 15.(1–6) Thin-section examples of downward and upward deflections of the clathrodictyid stromatoporoid laminae, caused by the intergrown corals. Black arrows indicate down-bending laminae, and white arrows indicate up-bending laminae: (1) NIGP 177179-14; (2) NIGP 177194-4; (3) NIGP 177194-11; (4) NIGP 159437; (5) NIGP 176515; (6) NIGP 177289. Down-bending laminae of Clathrodictyon cf. Cl. microundulatum occur near Bajgolia in (1–4), while the up-bending laminae are in the vicinity of intergrown Tryplasma (1, 3); (5) down-bending laminae of Clathrodictyon plicatum occur near the sharp irregularly shaped outer wall of Bajgolia (see also figures and corresponding text in Jeon et al., in press); (6) up-bending laminae of Ecclimadictyon nestori occur around intergrown Bajgolia. (7–17) Schematic drawings to illustrate the process of forming bending stromatoporoid laminae in the vicinity of endobiont: (7, 8) initial stage of settlement of endobionts on the growth surface of clathrodictyid species; (9–11) with the faster growth rate of clathrodictyid species than the endobionts, down-bending laminae developed near the endobionts; the endobionts were commonly killed by the overgrowth of clathrodictyid; (12–14) examples of up-bending laminae caused by the faster growth rate of endobionts than host clathrodictyid species, commonly terminated by sediment interruption; (15–17) examples of both up- and down-bending laminae around endobionts: (15) up-bending laminae formed by encrustation of pre-existing encrusting endobiont; (16, 17) faster growth of host clathrodictyid species reached up to same growth level as the endobiont and caused down-bending laminae.

Figure 15

Figure 16.(1, 2) Longitudinal sections of astrorhizae (black arrows) of Clathrodictyon cf. Cl. microundulatum with encrusted intergrown Bajgolia. Note that none of the distorted skeletal structures occurs near the contacts with endobionts: (1) NIGP 177196-4 from the S18 interval; (2) NIGP 177196-12 from the S18 interval. (3) Field photograph of feather-like growth form of clathrodictyid (probably Ecclimadictyon) and intergrown Bajgolia cluster from the S17 interval. (4–7) Thin-section photographs of feather-like growth form of clathrodictyids and intergrown Bajgolia clusters: (4) dendroid Ecclimadictyon nestori with intergrown Bajgolia, NIGP 159443 from the S18 interval; (5) dendroid Clathrodictyon cf. Cl. mammillatum with intergrown Bajgolia, NIGP 175173 from the S18 interval; (6) dendroid Clathrodictyon plicatum with intergrown Bajgolia NIGP 159448 from the S18 interval; (7) branching dendroid Clathrodictyon plicatum with intergrown Bajgolia, NIGP 159447 from the S18 interval. Specimens NIGP 159443, 159447, and 159448 in (4, 6, 7) were also illustrated by Lee et al. (2016b). (8) Abnormally widely spaced laminae of Clathrodictyon cf. Cl. microundulatum, NIGP 159446 from the S18 interval.

Figure 16

Figure 17.(1–5) Encrustation of diverse sessile organisms on the growth surface of clathrodictyid species: (1) encrusted and vertically grown Tryplasma on the growth surface of Clathrodictyon plicatum, NIGP 177245 from the S17 interval; (2) encrusted Heliolites on the growth surface of Clathrodictyon cf. Cl. microundulatum, showing possible spatial competition judging from their irregular physical contact, NIGP 179198 from the S15 interval; (3) syn-vivo interaction between microbe and Clathrodictyon idense, showing their twisted growth direction, NIGP 177107-1 from the S3 interval; (4) structure interpreted as a spiculate sponge encrusted on Clathrodictyon plicatum from the S17 interval, NIGP 177243; (5) multiple encrustations by tabulate coral, calcimicrobes, and bryozoans on the growth surface of Clathrodictyon cf. Cl. mammillatum, NIGP 177135 from the S18 interval. (6) Schematic reconstruction to show a variety of paleoecological interactions between clathrodictyid stromatoporoids and intergrown sessile organisms, including labechiid stromatoporoid, rugose, and tabulate corals.

Figure 17

Table 1.Stratigraphic distribution of host clathrodictyid stromatoporoids and endobionts in the Xiazhen Formation. The gray-colored intervals are occupied by labechiids (Stylostroma and Thamnobeatricea, respectively) without any clathrodictyid species. 1, Clathrodictyon cf. Cl. mammillatum; 2, Clathrodictyon cf. Cl. microundulatum; 3, Clathrodictyon idense; 4, Clathrodictyon megalamellatum Jeon n. sp.; 5, Clathrodictyon plicatum; 6, Ecclimadictyon nestori; 7, Ecclimadictyon undatum. Question mark indicates unidentified poorly preserved clathrodictyid stromatoporoid.

Figure 18

Figure 18.(1) Network analysis diagram of clathrodictyid stromatoporoid during the Late Ordovician. These listed species are clathrodictyids shared between two or more paleocontinents. (2) Three major faunal provinces of clathrodictyid stromatoporoid distribution during the Late Ordovician. Red question marks on Mongolia and Kazakh terranes indicate uncertainty over whether these regions should be included in the peri-Gondwana–Tarim–Altai faunal province due to insufficient investigation of clathrodictyid stromatoporoid faunas. Paleogeographic reconstruction modified from Cocks and Torsvik (2020). Note that this faunal province has a high similarity with the “Cathay-Tasman Province” proposed by Cocks and Torsvik (2020).

Figure 19

Table 2.All reported occurrences of intergrowth associations between stromatoporoids and other organisms in the Ordovician are compiled by age and locality. Note that the Katian occurrences are all from peri-Gondwanan terranes, together with the earliest known appearances of clathrodictyids; (T), tabulate coral; (U), uncertain; (SR), solitary rugose coral; (St), stromatoporoid; (B), bryozoan; (TW), tubeworm.