Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T04:15:27.603Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of fish assemblages between the Sea of Marmara and the Aegean Sea (north-eastern Mediterranean)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Cetin Keskin*
Affiliation:
Istanbul University, Department of Marine Biology, Fisheries Faculty, 34470 Laleli, Istanbul, Turkey
Francesc Ordines
Affiliation:
Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Centre Oceanogràfic de les Balears, Moll de Ponent s/n 07015 Palma, Spain
Beatriz Guijarro
Affiliation:
Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Centre Oceanogràfic de les Balears, Moll de Ponent s/n 07015 Palma, Spain
Enric Massutí
Affiliation:
Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Centre Oceanogràfic de les Balears, Moll de Ponent s/n 07015 Palma, Spain
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: C. Keskin, Istanbul University, Department of Marine Biology, Fisheries Faculty 34470 Laleli, Istanbul, Turkey email: seahorse@istanbul.edu.tr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The demersal fish assemblages of the south-western Sea of Marmara and the north-eastern Aegean Sea were examined in relation to their biogeographical and environmental conditions. Sampling was carried out during bottom trawl surveys conducted during five periods between June 2006 and August 2007. A total of 40 hauls were processed, including 16 in the Sea of Marmara (38–74 m deep) and 24 in the north-eastern Aegean Sea (63–401 m deep). A total of 47,940 individuals, from 91 species and 47 families were collected. Cluster analysis of catch data indicated that there were three assemblages, one in the shelf of the Sea of Marmara and two in the Aegean Sea (<100 and >200 m depth). The numerical abundance and biomass of fish, mean fish weight, mean species richness, diversity and evenness were compared between these assemblages. Multivariate analysis was used to test differences in environmental conditions between areas, and relationships between species and environmental variables were explored by using redundancy analysis. In addition to bathymetric differences, differences in both diversity and species composition were observed between shelf assemblages in the two nearby areas. The distinct biogeographical, environmental characteristics (depth, dissolved oxygen and temperature) and fishing pressure are discussed as the main factors which could explain the differences detected.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2011
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Map of the study areas: north-eastern part of the Mediterranean (A), the south-western Sea of Marmara and the north-eastern Aegean Sea (B), showing the sampling stations. The 50, 100, 200 and 500 m isobaths are also shown.

Figure 1

Table 1. Sampling stations and hauls characteristics, with total number of species (S), abundance (A; individuals/km2) and biomass (B; kg/km2) of pelagic and demersal fish caught during the five surveys developed in the south-western Sea of Marmara (SM) and the north-eastern Aegean Sea (AS).

Figure 2

Table 2. Description of the redundancy analysis models used to test for the effects of explanatory variables. In all cases 999 unrestricted permutations were conducted to test the significance of the variables. DO, dissolved oxygen (mg/l).

Figure 3

Table 3. Fish species caught in the south-western Sea of Marmara and north-eastern Aegean Sea. Total number of individuals (N), total weight (W, kg), depth-range (D, m), the frequency of appearance (F, percentage of hauls in which the species was captured within this depth-range), number of hauls (n). The asterisks indicate species removed for the analysis (*, species caught in only one sample; **, pelagic species).

Figure 4

Fig. 2. Dendrogram (A) and two-dimensional non-metric multidimensional scaling ordination (B) based on fish standardized species abundance. Labels show the mean depths (m) and sampling period (JL06: July 2006; O06: October 2006; M07: March 2007; J07: June 2007 and A07: August 2007) for each sample. The samples were divided into three groups associated with bathymetric strata and areas. SM: 38-72 m in the south-western Sea of Marmara; ASH: 68-100 m in the north-eastern Aegean Sea; AS: 177-395 m in the north-eastern Aegean Sea.

Figure 5

Table 4. Similarity percentage analysis results showing the mean abundance (A; individuals/km2), average within-group similarity (SIM), the percentage contribution to the similarity (SIM%), standard deviation of similarity (SIM/SD), the percentage contribution to within-group similarity (SIM%), and the accumulated SIM% (ΣSIM%). SM, shelf in the south-western Sea of Marmara; ASH, shelf in the north-eastern Aegean Sea; ASL, upper slope in the north-eastern Aegean Sea.

Figure 6

Table 5. Mean values and standard errors of the abundance (individuals/km2), biomass (kg/km2), fish weight (kg), species richness (number of species; total species richness also shown), diversity and evenness indices for shelf groups resulting from the cluster analysis, and results of the t-test. SM, shelf in the south-western Sea of Marmara; ASH, shelf in the north-eastern Aegean Sea; n.s., not significant; SE, standard error; *P < 0.01; **P < 0.001.

Figure 7

Fig. 3. The vertical profiles of the water temperature, salinity and dissolved oxygen for each sample from 38 to 72 m depth in the south-western Sea of Marmara, and from 68 to 395 m depth in the north-eastern Aegean Sea.

Figure 8

Table 6. Total mean values (±standard error) of the environmental variables on the continental shelf areas, and their mean (±standard error), minimum and maximum values by sampling period. DO, dissolved oxygen (mg/l); T, temperature (°C); S, salinity (psu); D, depth (m).

Figure 9

Fig. 4. Redundancy analysis tri-plot for fish species, samples and environmental variables. Alat, Arnoglossus laterna; Clin, Citharus linguatula; Egur, Eutrigla gurnardus; Gnig, Gobius niger; Lfrie, Lesuerogobius friesii; Lcav, Lepidotrigla cavillone; Lbud, Lophius budegassa; Mmerlang, Merlangius merlangus; Mmerluc, Merluccius merluccius; Mbar, Mullus barbatus; Shep, Serranus hepatus; Rcla, Raja clavata; Scan, Scyliorhinus canicula; Tdra, Trachinus draco. DO and T are the dissolved oxygen and temperature near the bottom, respectively.

Figure 10

Table 7. Results of the redundancy analysis model. The explained variance (EV%), the F statistic and the significance (P value) are indicated. DO, dissolved oxygen (mg/l); T, temperature (°C); S, salinity (psu); D, depth (m).