Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-kwdml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T02:31:21.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experimental mass-flux measurements: a comparison of different gauges with estimated theoretical data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

D. Font
Affiliation:
Departament de Geología Dinàmica, Geofísica i Paleontología, Universitat de Barcelona, 08071 Barcelona, Spain
M. Mases
Affiliation:
ICC, Servei Geològic de Catalunya, Parc de Montjuïc s/n, 08038 Barcelona, Spain
J.M. Vilaplana
Affiliation:
Departament de Geología Dinàmica, Geofísica i Paleontología, Universitat de Barcelona, 08071 Barcelona, Spain
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In experimental snowdrifting mass-flux measurements many different instruments have been tested (Takeuchi, CEMAGREE Mases, etc.). Very often the results obtained are a function of the gauge used. However, in order to compare data from different instruments, orders of magnitude have to be similar.

Since 1992, snowdrifting has been studied at an experimental plot at La Molina ski resort (eastern Spanish Pyrenees). The alpine site, characterized by a plateau topography, is located at 2250 m.

In this paper, different gauges used to measure snowdrifting mass flux at this site are presented: one snow-collector column and two types of snow traps. Snow-collector columns (prismatic boxes) are permanent installations and are used to measure the mass-flux episode. Snow traps (Takeuchi, 1980: modified) are lighter and more mobile, and they are used for short experiments during a wind episode during which mass-flux data are obtained.

The three different gauges are compared and the rate of trapping efficiency is suggested from a comparison of the field data with estimated mass-flux data deduced from empirical formulae (Mellor and Fellers, 1986; Naaim-Bouvet and others, 1996). The mass-flux values obtained at the experimental site are lower than the estimated values.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1998
Figure 0

Fig. 1.The driftin-snow gauges.

Figure 1

Fig. 2.The shear-stress device (Guily, 1991).

Figure 2

Fig. 3.The different gauges during a field experiment. From left to right: anemometers, snow trap A, snow trap B and snow-collector column.

Figure 3

Table 1.Data obtained from La Molina during the snowdrifting episodes of 8 February 1996 and 15 February 1997

Figure 4

Fig. 4.Comparison of the mass-flux profiles obtained using the three different gauges used at La Molina. Lines are fitted to the data (see Table 1).

Figure 5

Fig. 5.Relation of the collection efficiency, relative to the snow-collector columns, with heights for the type A and B snow-trap gauges. Lines are fitted to the data (see Table 1).

Figure 6

Fig. 6.Experimental mass-flux profiles vs height obtained at La Molina. Using the type A snow trap profiles: 2, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9, together with the B snow traps 3 and 4 and profile 1 with the snow-collector columns. Dashed lines represent the theoretical values proposed by Mellor and Fellers (1986) (see Table 2).

Figure 7

Table 2.Features of the profiles shown in Figure 6.

Figure 8

Fig. 7.Experimental mass-flux profiles vs height obtained at La Molina. The values of the A (profiles 2, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9) and B (profiles 3 and 4) traps have been corrected applying the collection efficiency rates obtained from the comparison with the snow-collector columns. Dashed lines represent the theoretical values proposed by Mellor and Fellers (1986) (see Table 2).