Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T13:34:04.700Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Regulation of embryonic size in early mouse development in vitro culture system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2013

Tomoka Hisaki
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Applied Genetics, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113–8657, Japan.
Ikuma Kawai
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Applied Genetics, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113–8657, Japan.
Koji Sugiura
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Applied Genetics, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113–8657, Japan.
Kunihiko Naito
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Applied Genetics, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113–8657, Japan.
Kiyoshi Kano*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Developmental Biology, Joint-Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi 753–8515, Japan. Biomedical Science Center for Translational Research (BSCTR), United Graduate School of Veterinary Science, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi 753–8515, Japan.
*
All correspondence to: Kiyoshi Kano. Laboratory of Developmental Biology, Joint-Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi 753–8515, Japan. e-mail: kanokiyo@yamaguchi-u.ac.jp
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Mammals self-regulate their body size throughout development. In the uterus, embryos are properly regulated to be a specific size at birth. Previously, size and cell number in aggregated embryos, which were made from two or more morulae, and half embryos, which were halved at the 2-cell stage, have been analysed in vivo in preimplantation and post-implantation development in mice. Here, we examined whether or not the mouse embryo has the capacity to self-regulate growth using an in vitro culture system. To elucidate embryonic histology, cells were counted in aggregated or half embryos in comparison with control embryos. Both double- and triple-aggregated embryos contained more cells than did control embryos during all culture periods, and the relative growth ratios showed no growth inhibition in an in vitro culture system. Meanwhile, half embryos contained fewer cells than control embryos, but the number grew throughout the culture period. Our data suggest that the growth of aggregated embryos is not affected and continues in an in vitro culture system. On the other hand, the growth of half embryos accelerates and continues in an in vitro culture system. This situation, in turn, implied that post-implantation mouse embryos might have some potential to regulate their own growth and size as seen by using an in vitro culture system without uterus factors. In conclusion, our results indicated that embryos have some ways in which to regulate their own size in mouse early development.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 
Figure 0

Figure 1 Production of aggregated embryos. Diagram of production of larger blastocyst-like embryos with excess numbers of cells. Two or three embryos were aggregated during the 8-cell stage.

Figure 1

Figure 2 Growth and differentiation of aggregated embryos in vitro culture system. (A–C) Double (×2) and triple (×3) aggregations were completed at 2.5 d.p.c., the same as single (×1) embryos. (D–F) Both control and aggregated embryos developed into blastocyst-like embryos at the 24 h culture period. (D–U) Embryos attached and the trophoblast cells migrated to the surface of the gelatin-coated culture dish after they were transferred to an RPMI-based culture medium at the 24 h culture period. Attachment and outgrowth of the embryos were observed until the 144 h culture period. Scale bars, 50 μm (A–F) and 2 μm (G–U). The white arrowheads indicate giant trophoblast cells, and the solid arrowheads indicate cylindrical structures.

Figure 2

Figure 3 (A–G) Localization of Cdx2 and Oct4 immunofluorescence in embryos cultured for 96 h in an in vitro culture system. Representative images from wild-type embryos are shown. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 (B, F). Cdx2 was expressed mainly in migrated trophoblast cells (white arrowhead) and some outer-region cells (solid arrowhead) (C). Oct4 was expressed only in the core region of cells (G, white arrow). Scale bars, 50 μm.

Figure 3

Table 1 Number of cells in aggregated and non-aggregated embryos

Figure 4

Figure 4 Relative growth ratios of cell numbers at each period in aggregated embryos, double (×2) and triple (×3), and in single embryos (×1) based on the cell number at 72 h culture period. Throughout the culture period, there were no differences in the rate of increase between the aggregates and the control. All data are presented as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM).

Figure 5

Figure 5 Production of half embryos. Diagram of production of smaller blastocyst-like embryos with deficient numbers of cells. Blastomeres were separated at the 2-cell stage.

Figure 6

Figure 6 Growth and differentiation of half embryos in vitro culture system. (A, B) The two cells were separated at 1.5 d.p.c. to produce control (×2/2) and half (×1/2) embryos without the zona pellucida. (E, F) Both control and half embryos developed into blastocyst-like embryos at 48 h culture period. (K–P) After being transferred to an RPMI-based culture medium at the 48 h culture period, the embryos attached and the trophoblast-like cells migrated to the surface of the gelatin-coated culture dish at the 120 h culture period. Attachment and outgrowth of the blastocyst-like embryos were observed until the 168 h culture period. Scale bars, 50 μm (A–F) and 2 μm (G–P).

Figure 7

Table 2 Number of cells in half and control embryos

Figure 8

Figure 7 Relative growth ratios of cell numbers at each period of the half embryos (×1/2) and control embryos (×2/2) based on the cell number at the 96 h culture period. The relative ratio of half embryos was significantly lower at the 96 h culture period, but increased prominently towards the 168 h culture period. All data are presented as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). *Statistically significant difference at P< 0.05.

Supplementary material: Image

Hisaki Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Hisaki Supplementary Material(Image)
Image 1.4 MB