Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T10:08:30.931Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sterility of Cydia pomonella by X ray irradiation as an alternative to gamma radiation for the sterile insect technique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2022

Jing-Han Zhang ,
Na Li ,
Hui-Yuan Zhao ,
Ya-Qi Wang ,
Xue-Qing Yang  and
Kong-Ming Wu Open the ORCID record for Kong-Ming Wu [Opens in a new window]
Jing-Han Zhang
Affiliation:
College of Plant Protection, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, Liaoning, China Key Laboratory of Economical and Applied Entomology of Liaoning Province, Shenyang 110866, Liaoning, China
Na Li
Affiliation:
College of Plant Protection, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, Liaoning, China Key Laboratory of Economical and Applied Entomology of Liaoning Province, Shenyang 110866, Liaoning, China
Hui-Yuan Zhao
Affiliation:
Hebi Jiaduoke Industry and Trade Co., Ltd, Hebi 458030, Henan Province, China
Ya-Qi Wang
Affiliation:
College of Plant Protection, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, Liaoning, China Key Laboratory of Economical and Applied Entomology of Liaoning Province, Shenyang 110866, Liaoning, China
Xue-Qing Yang*
Affiliation:
College of Plant Protection, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, Liaoning, China Key Laboratory of Economical and Applied Entomology of Liaoning Province, Shenyang 110866, Liaoning, China
Kong-Ming Wu*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China
*
Author for correspondence: Xue-Qing Yang, Kong-Ming Wu, Email: sling233@hotmail.com, wukongming@caas.cn
Author for correspondence: Xue-Qing Yang, Kong-Ming Wu, Email: sling233@hotmail.com, wukongming@caas.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The codling moth Cydia pomonella is a major pest of global significance impacting pome fruits and walnuts. It threatens the apple industry in the Loess Plateau and Bohai Bay in China. Sterile insect technique (SIT) could overcome the limitations set by environmentally compatible area-wide integrated pest management (AW-IPM) approaches such as mating disruption and attract-kill that are difficult to suppress in a high-density pest population, as well as the development of insecticide resistance. In this study, we investigated the effects of X-ray irradiation (183, 366, 549 Gy) on the fecundity and fertility of a laboratory strain of C. pomonella, using a newly developed irradiator, to evaluate the possibility of X-rays as a replacement for Cobalt60 (60Co-γ) and the expanded future role of this approach in codling moth control. Results show that the 8th-day is the optimal age for irradiation of male pupae. The fecundity decreased significantly as the dosage of radiation increased. The mating ratio and mating number were not influenced. However, treated females were sub-sterile at a radiation dose of 183 Gy (20.93%), and were almost 100% sterile at a radiation dose of 366 Gy or higher. Although exposure to a radiation dose of 366 Gy resulted in a significant reduction in the mating competitiveness of male moths, our radiation biology results suggest that this new generation of X-ray irradiator has potential applications in SIT programs for future codling moth control.

Keywords

Cydia pomonellafecundityirradiationsterile insect techniquesterility

Information

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 113 , Issue 1 , February 2023 , pp. 72 - 78
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

The codling moth, Cydia pomonella (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) is a major global pest of pome fruit and walnuts (Reyes et al., Reference Reyes, Franck, Charmillot, Ioriatti, Olivares, Pasqualini and Sauphanor2007; Voudouris et al., Reference Voudouris, Sauphanor, Franck, Reyes, Mamuris, Tsitsipis, Vontas and Margaritopoulos2011; Işci and Ay, Reference Işci and Ay2017). Fruit quality is seriously affected by this pest, especially when the larvae bore into the center of fruits to feed on the sarcocarp and seeds, thus leaving frass on the surface and causing fruit abscission (Yang et al., Reference Yang, Zhang, Wang, Dong, Gao and Jia2016). In orchards, C. pomonella infestation rates can reach 80% for apples if pest management strategies are not conducted (Wan et al., Reference Wan, Yin, Tang, Wan, Chen, Wu, Huang, Qian, Rota-Stabelli, Yang, Wang, Wang, Zhang, Guo, Gu, Chen, Xing, Xi, Liu, Lin, Guo, Liu, He, Tian, Jacquin-Joly, Franck, Siegwart, Ometto, Anfora, Blaxter, Meslin, Nguyen, Dalíková, Marec, Olivares, Maugin, Shen, Liu, Guo, Luo, Liu, Fan, Feng, Zhao, Peng, Wang, Liu, Zhan, Liu, Shi, Jiang, Jin, Xian, Lu, Ye, Li, Yang, Xiong, Walters and Li2019). Therefore, this pest poses a great threat to fruit production worldwide and annual crop losses amount to hundreds of billions of dollars and with annual crop damage estimated to be tens of millions of dollars (Knight et al., Reference Knight, Judd, Gilligan, Fuentes-Contreras, Walker, Xu and Fountain2019; Mohammed, Reference Mohammed2019).

The C. pomonella is a major invasive agricultural pest in China that has become an issue of pome fruit export concern (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Hu, Li, Wang and Yang2019). This pest is native to central Asia Minor and was first found in Xinjiang, China in 1957 (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Zhou, Wang and Chen1957). But in recent years, it has extended further into Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Ningxia, Gansu, Heilongjiang, Jilin, and Liaoning (Yang and Zhang, Reference Yang and Zhang2015; Chen et al., Reference Chen, Chen, Ge, Yang and Wang2020). Field monitoring performed by the National Agricultural Technology Extension Service Center of China in 2020 showed that C. pomonella was now found in Beijing, Hebei, and Tianjin, closing in to the main apple production areas in the Loess Plateau and Bohai Bay, and causing a serious threat to the development of the apple industry in China (Fang et al., Reference Fang, Cai, Ke, Xing, Yang and Wang2018). Considering its great damage and potential threat to agricultural production, C. pomonella has been listed in the 10 pests of the First-Kind of Crop Diseases and Insect Pests List, by the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People's Republic of China (PRC). Therefore, it has become urgent to develop effective prevention and control strategies for this invasive pest to block or delay its further spread into the main production areas.

C. pomonella in orchards is usually controlled by integrated pest management (IPM) methods, including environmentally compatible strategies including agricultural practices (Reyes et al., Reference Reyes, Franc, Olivares, Margaritopoulos, Knight and Sauphanor2009), pheromone-mediated mating disruption (Witzgall et al., Reference Witzgall, Stelinski, Gut and Thomson2008), attract-kill (Charmillot et al., Reference Charmillot, Hofer and Pasquier2000), and frequent application of insecticides (Soleño et al., Reference Soleño, Parra-Morales, Cichón, Garrido, Guiñazú and Montagna2020). However, these environmentally compatible approaches have the limitations in suppressing a high density of pest population (Ju et al., Reference Ju, Mota-Sanchez, Fuentes-Contreras, Zhang, Wang and Yang2021). In addition, insecticide overuse has inevitably led to the development of C. pomonella resistance to most of the commonly used insecticides in at least 16 countries (Wei et al., Reference Wei, Liu, Hu and Yang2020; Ju et al., Reference Ju, Mota-Sanchez, Fuentes-Contreras, Zhang, Wang and Yang2021). Therefore, the development of alternative and effective strategies remains critical in the management of C. pomonella worldwide (Agasyeva et al., Reference Agasyeva, Ismailov, Nastasiy and Nefedova2021). One alternative strategy that has been successfully used to suppress C. pomonella populations is the sterile insect technique (SIT) (Knipple, Reference Knipple2013; Thistlewood and Judd, Reference Thistlewood and Judd2019). This strategy is environmentally benign, species-specific, and highly compatible with other area-wide IPM methods (Dyck et al., Reference Dyck, Hendrichs and Robinson2007). In general, SIT involves three key components: mass rearing of the target insect species, production of sterile insects, and release of the sterilized insects into the field to mate with wild insects of the opposite sex (Dyck et al., Reference Dyck, Hendrichs and Robinson2007). The first successful SIT program for C. pomonella control was developed in the 1990s under the ongoing OkanaganeKootenay Sterile Insect Release (OK SIR) program in south-central British Columbia, Canada, using Cobalt60 (60Co-γ) (Bloem and Bloem, Reference Bloem, Bloem, AliNiazee and Long1996; OK SIR, 2011). This program was proven to have a good effect on controlling C. pomonella, with the number of orchards without damage increasing from 42% in 1995 to 91% in 1997 (Bloem and Bloem, Reference Bloem and Bloem2000).

Cobalt60 is the earliest and most widely used radioactive source in SIT, with advantages in good penetration performance and dose rate stability (Li et al., Reference Li, Zhao, Chen, Ju, Wei and Yang2021). However, a serious problem has arisen recently for the use of Cobalt60 source in SIT projects as it is becoming almost impossible to acquire radioactive sources for insect sterilization as well as its radioactive pose a safety hazard (Mastrangelo et al., Reference Mastrangelo, Parker, Jessup, Pereira, Orozco-Dávila, Islam, Dammalage and Walder2010). Moreover, the SIT program using Cobalt60 as the radioactive source is also limited by economic constraints (Knipple, Reference Knipple2013). Compared with other control strategies to control codling moth, the area-wide SIT program is the most expensive way, with an estimated global cost at nearly $1120 per ha, and that does not account for the additional costs of supplemental controls such as insecticide, mating disruption, etc. (Thistlewood and Judd, Reference Thistlewood and Judd2019). As a consequence, the exploration of methods to replace Cobalt60 with a less expensive X-ray source is useful to provide a sustainable and effective strategy of area-wide management of codling moth using SIT. In this study, we investigated the radiation biology of a new generation of X-ray irradiator on the codling moth, including determining the optimal age of pupae for irradiation and the optimal irradiation dose, as well as its effects on adult longevity and reproduction-related parameters such as mating competitiveness.

Materials and methods

Insects

A C. pomonella strain has been bred continuously in the laboratory for more than 50 generations without exposure to any ionizing radiation (Hu et al., Reference Hu, Wang, Ju, Chen, Tan, Mota-Sanchez and Yang2020). Larvae were reared on the artificial diet and maintained in a growth chamber (MLR-352H-PC, Panasonic) under the following conditions: temperature 26 ± 1°C, relative humidity 60 ± 5%, photoperiod of 16:8 h (light/dark), as described by Wang et al. (Reference Wang, Hu, Li, Wang and Yang2019). Under the rearing protocol used, the duration of the pupal stage was 9 days, so at the time of irradiation, pupae that were 1, 4, and 7 days before emergence were 8-, 5-, and 2-day-old pupae, respectively. Moths were supplied with a 10% honey solution.

Irradiation

A new X-ray irradiator (JYK-001 type) (fig. 1) independently developed by Hebi Jiaduoke Industry and Trade Co., Ltd, Hebi, China, was used in this study. The size of the irradiator is 600 cm × 250 cm × 250 cm (length × width × height). Mature larvae were collected from the diet, sorted by sex, placed in a plastic container (25 cm × 12 cm × 15 cm) with corrugated paper on the bottom, and allowed to pupate. Different ages of male pupae (2-, 5-, and 8-day-old) were placed in a cylindrical transparent tube (diameter: 2 cm; length: 6 cm) in the irradiation chamber (length: 21 cm; width: 24 cm; height: 16–40 cm) for irradiation by exposure to X-ray radiation at a dose rate of 12.7 Gy min−i (with the error within 0.5 mGy s−G) for 4 h (183 Gy), 8 h (366 Gy), and 12 h (549 Gy), respectively [*One gray (Gy) is the SI unit of 100 rads, equal to an absorbed dose of 1 Joule/kilogram]. The irradiation dose used in this paper is the average dose, and the dose rate was measured using a Radcal Accu-Dose+ digitizer with a 10 × 6–0.6 CT ion chamber. The radiation source was located 16 cm above the samples, and at this irradiation height, the effective irradiation area is 9 cm × 9 cm. The effective thickness of irradiation is less than 30 mm. The voltage of the X ray generator is 180 KV, and the current is 10 mA.

Figure 1.

The X-ray irradiator used in this study. The irradiator (JYK-001 type) was independently developed by Hebi Jiaduoke Industry and Trade Co., Ltd, Hebi, China. (Left) Outside view of the X-ray irradiator and (Right) the platform for the manipulation of irradiation.

Effect of radiation on emergence rate

Three groups, each with 10 pupae were used per dose. Non-irradiated insects were used as a control. Both irradiated and non-irradiated samples were packed in a glass container stuffed with cotton and laid flat in plastic containers (25 × 12 × 15 cm) in a growth chamber (MLR-352H-PC, Panasonic) under the conditions described above. The temperature was kept at 6 ± 2°C and 25 ± 1°C during transportation and irradiation, respectively. The time of eclosion and the rates of adult eclosion were recorded.

Effect of radiation on adult moth sterility and adult lifespan

The optimal age of pupae for radiation, as determined above, was used in the following studies. Male pupae from 1 day before emergence (8-day old) were treated with doses of 183 Gy, 366 Gy, and 549 Gy, respectively. Treated samples were reared under the same conditions as described above. After emergence, irradiated males and non-irradiated females were introduced in pairs (sex ratio 1:1) randomly into a waxed-paper oviposition cage (25 × 12 × 15 cm) for oviposition. Moths were supplied with a 10% honey solution on absorbent cotton. Three groups, each with 10 pairs were used per dose, with the non-irradiated insects used as the controls. Survival of male adults was recorded per day.

The mate capsule of dead female adults was dissected under a stereoscope with 1 × objective (TS-63X, Shanghai Shangguang New Optical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) to check the spermatophore formation, recording the numbers of matings by counting the number of spermatophores within the spermathecae, and calculating the mating rate. Waxed-paper oviposition cages with eggs were incubated in the growth chamber (MLR-352H-PC, Panasonic) under the same conditions described above to allow for complete egg development and larval eclosion. The eggs per day, the total number of eggs oviposited, and the number of eggs hatched were counted according to Blomefield et al. (Reference Blomefield, Bloem and Carpenter2010).

Effect of radiation on male mating competitiveness

The 2–3 day old, virgin moths were used to assess the mating competitiveness of the irradiated codling moths. Non-irradiated insects were used as a control. Irradiated males (IM), non-irradiated (NM) males, non-irradiated females (NF) were introduced in the ratios of 0:1:1, 1:0:1, and 1:1:1 respectively, into a waxed-paper oviposition cage (25 × 12 × 15 cm) for mating. The total number of eggs oviposited and hatched was counted per group. For each mating combination, 3 replicates each with 10 male pupae from 1 day before emergence was irradiated with 366 Gy. The competitive mating index (C) was calculated according to the method of Fried (Reference Fried1971) using the following formula:

$$E = \displaystyle{{N( Ha) + S( Hs) } \over {N + S}}$$
$${\rm C} = \displaystyle{{Ha-Ee} \over {Ee-Hs}} \div \displaystyle{S \over N}$$

N is the number of NM, S is the number of IM. Ha is the egg hatching rate of NM paired with NF, whereas Hs is the egg hatching rate of IM paired with NF. Ee is the observed and expected value of egg hatching rate of a certain S/N ratio of mixed male moths paired with NF.

Data analysis

The mortality, life span, number of eggs laid (fecundity), and hatched (fertility) were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SPSS 19 (IBM Inc., Chicago, IL). Significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) were analyzed by the Duncan test. Results were plotted using the GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software, CA) software.

Results

Effects of radiation on emergence rate of C. pomonella

Compared with the control, a varying degrees of decline for the emergence rate of the tested stages of male pupae exposed to different doses of X-ray were observed. The trend is similar for 183 and 366 Gy. There is a more dramatic effect at 2-day-old and 5-day-old pupae. However, at 8-day-old pupae the emergence rate is less than the rest of the treatments (table 1).

Table 1.

Emergence rate of male pupae of C. pomonella irradiated with different irradiation doses of X-Ray

aMale pupae from 7 (2-day old), 4 (5-day-old), and 1 (8-day-old) day before emergence were treated with doses of 0 (CK), 183 Gy, 366 Gy, and 549 Gy, respectively.

bThree replicates, each with 10 males was used in this study. The data in the table are the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Letters behind indicate significant differences analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Duncan's test (P < 0.05).

After being irradiated with 183 and 366 Gy, 2-day-old pupae almost did not eclose. For 5-day-old male pupae, the emergence rate of the 183 Gy irradiated group reached the same level (F 1,3 = 9.04, P = 0.057) as the control. But emergence significantly declined (F 1, 3 = 88.59, P = 0.003) in the 366 Gy irradiated group compared with the control. No significant difference was found in the emergence rate of 8-day-old pupae in the 183 Gy (F 1, 4 = 6.13, P = 0.087) and 366 Gy (F 1, 4 = 5.22, P = 0.105) groups when compared with the control; however, the emergence rate in the 549 Gy irradiated group was lower than that of the control (table 1).

Effects of radiation on adult moth sterility of C. pomonella

There was no significant difference (F 1, 16 = 0.027, P = 0.87) in the total number of eggs laid per female between 183 Gy treated groups (164.49 ± 12.98) and the control (167.24 ± 10.53). The fecundity of C. pomonella treated with 366 Gy (128.84 ± 9.14) and 549 Gy (79.36 ± 9.21) was significantly lower (366 Gy: F 1, 15 = 7.40, P = 0.016; 549 Gy: F 1, 13 = 34.32, P < 0.001) than those treated with 183 Gy and the control, and the lowest fecundity was observed in the 549 Gy irradiated group (fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Effect of different irradiation doses on the fecundity of C. pomonella. 8-days-old males were treated with 0 (CK), 183, 366, and 549 Gy, and the eclosed adults were out-crossed to untreated adults. Three replicates, each with 10 males per dose were coupled with 10 virgin females. The results are shown as the mean ± SD. Error bars represent the standard errors calculated from three replicates. Letters on the error bars indicate significant differences analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Duncan's test (P < 0.05).

The percentage of eggs that hatched was influenced by the radiation dose. The egg hatching rates of the 183 Gy, 366 Gy, and 549 Gy groups were 20.93 ± 1.30%, 4.37 ± 2.25%, and 0.66 ± 0.42%, respectively. This is significantly lower (183 Gy: F 1, 16 = 123.10, P < 0.001; 366 Gy: F 1, 15 = 172.01, P < 0.001; 549 Gy: F 1, 13 = 168.70, P < 0.001) than that of the control (72.07 ± 4.42%) (fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Effect of different irradiation doses on the fertility of C. pomonella. Male pupae from 1 day before emergence (8-day-old) were treated with 0 (CK), 183, 366, and 549 Gy, and the eclosed adults were out-crossed to untreated adults. Three replicates, each with 10 males per dose were coupled with 10 virgin females. The results are shown as the mean ± SD. Error bars represent the standard errors calculated from three replicates. Letters on the error bars indicate significant differences analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Duncan's test (P < 0.05).

Compared with the control group, the mating rate of the male moths developed from pupae irradiated with 549 Gy significantly decreased (F 1, 13 = 18.20, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference (F 2, 23 = 1.396, P = 0.27) in mating rate between the 183 Gy and 366 Gy irradiated groups when compared with the control. In addition, there was no significant difference (F 3, 28 = 3.47, P = 0.085) in the number of matings between the control group and each of the irradiated groups (table 2).

Table 2.

Effects of different X-Ray irradiation doses on the mating rate and mating frequency of C. pomonella

Three replicates, each with 10 males were coupled with 10 virgin females. The data in the table are the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Letters behind indicate significant differences analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Duncan's test (P < 0.05).

Effects of radiation on the adult lifespan of C. pomonella

There was no significant difference (F 2, 23 = 2.75, P = 0.085) in the longevity of C. pomonella between adults developed from the pupae irradiated with 183 Gy and 366 Gy, and the control group, with average lifespans of 17.84 ± 0.74 d (mean of triplicates ± SE), 21.05 ± 1.46 d, and 19.02 ± 0.60 d, respectively. The longevity of male moths developed from the pupae irradiated with 549 Gy (14.93 ± 0.63 d) was significantly shorter (F 1, 13 = 2.88, P < 0.001) than that of the controls (fig. 4).

Figure 4.

Survival curves of C. pomonella treated with different irradiation doses. Three replicates, each with 10 males per dose were coupled with 10 virgin females. Survival period data for each treatment were recorded and analyzed by ANOVA with Duncan's test (P < 0.05). (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article).

Effect of radiation on male mating competitiveness

The egg hatching rate of IM: NM: NF at a ratio of 1:0:1 was 10.17 ± 13.02%, significantly lower than the ratio of 0:1:1 (egg hatching rate of 85.98 ± 4.16%; F = 102.17, P = 0.002) and 1:1:1 (egg hatching rate of 84.92 ± 6.31%; F = 0.102, P = 0.77), with an expected value of 48.08% (table 3). The competitive mating index (C) is 0.01, indicating that 366 Gy of irradiation reduces the mating competitiveness of codling moth male moths (table 3).

Table 3.

Effect of X-Ray irradiation (366 Gy) on the mating competitiveness of C. pomonella adults

Irradiated males (IM), non-irradiated (NM) males, non-irradiated females (NF) were introduced in the ratios of 0:1:1, 1:0:1, and 1:1:1, respectively, for mating. Three replicates, each with 0 (at the ratio of 0:1:1) or 10 (at the ratio of 1:0:1 or 1:1:1) IM were assessed. The data in the table are the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Letters behind indicate significant differences analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Duncan's test (P < 0.05).

Discussion

SIT has been effectively implemented in the eradication and control of the codling moth (Bloem and Bloem, Reference Bloem, Bloem, AliNiazee and Long1996; Bloem et al., Reference Bloem, Bloem, Carpenter, Dyck, Hendrichs and Robinson2005; Thistlewood and Judd, Reference Thistlewood and Judd2019). When the SIT program began, the radiation biology of C. pomonella should first be better understood than other relevant aspects such as its biology and ecology (Thistlewood and Judd, Reference Thistlewood and Judd2019). To increase the effectiveness of released males in SIT programs, it is critical to optimize the balance of mating competitiveness and sterility when copulating with wild females (Bakri et al., Reference Bakri, Heather, Hendrichs and Ferris2005a, Reference Bakri, Mehta, Lance, Dyck, Hendrichs and Robinson2005b).

The timing of pupal irradiation affects the quality of the resultant adults (Fezza et al., Reference Fezza, Follett and Shelly2021). In this study, we found that the highest emergence was observed for pupae irradiated at 1 day before emergence at all irradiation doses (183, 366, 549 Gy) using the newly developed X-ray irradiator. The emergence was negatively impacted by irradiating pupae at 5- and 8-days after pupation (corresponding to 4 and 1 days before emergence), at 366 Gy. However, emergence for pupae irradiated 7 days before emergence (2-day-old pupae) was significantly reduced compared to pupae irradiated at 1 and 4 days before emergence and the control. Results suggest that it is acceptable to use pupae from 1 day before emergence for SIT programs without compromising the overall quality of the released moths at 183 Gy. Our results are in line with the findings in Conopomorpha sinensis (Fu et al., Reference Fu, Zhu, Deng, Weng, Hu and Zhang2016), Bactrocera dorsalis (Fezza et al., Reference Fezza, Follett and Shelly2021), and Grapholita molesta (Li et al., Reference Li, Zhao, Chen, Ju, Wei and Yang2021), suggesting that the young pupal stage is more sensitive to radiation. Although mitotic and meiotic cells are the most sensitive to radiation, mitosis has almost stopped in the cells of old pupae (Clements, Reference Clements1992). Therefore, pupae very close to eclosion would have to be irradiated almost instantaneously (Andreasen and Curtis, Reference Andreasen and Curtis2005).

The correct irradiation dose used for sterilization is crucial for SIT programs; irradiation doses that are too low will result in insufficiently sterile insects, while doses too high may generate males with reduced mating competitiveness (Robinson et al., Reference Robinson, Cayol and Hendrichs2002; Guerfali et al., Reference Guerfali, Hamden, Fadhl, Marzouki, Raies and Chevrier2011). In this study, we found that with the increase of irradiation dose, the eggs laid (fecundity) and hatched (fertility) of resultant adults copulating with non-irradiated females decreased significantly. When males were exposed to ≥366 Gy and paired with non-irradiated females, there was low residual fertility varying between 0.66 and 4.37%, which are similar to the results of Blomefield et al. (Reference Blomefield, Bloem and Carpenter2010) for C. pomonella and Bloem et al. (Reference Bloem, Carpenter and Hendrik2003) for Cryptophlebia leucotreta, using 60Co-γ ≥100 Gy and 150 Gy, respectively. A recent report showed that almost 100% sterility was observed using a novel X-ray irradiator at a radiation dose of 91.2 Gy for Ceratitis capitata and 31.7 Gy for Anastrepha fraterculus, which was not significantly different from the radiation dose of 60Co-γ (Mastrangelo et al., Reference Mastrangelo, Parker, Jessup, Pereira, Orozco-Dávila, Islam, Dammalage and Walder2010). Differences in the sterilization doses for reaching 100% sterile between these results may be related to the radiosensitivity of different species, the differences in the irradiation environment and conditions. It should be noticed that it is not necessary to achieve a dose that provides 100% of sterility, but a large proportion of sterile males with a high degree of sterility relative to the wild type is very important (Bakri et al., Reference Bakri, Heather, Hendrichs and Ferris2005a, Reference Bakri, Mehta, Lance, Dyck, Hendrichs and Robinson2005b).

The choice of appropriate radiation dose for Lepidoptera is complicated because they are relatively radiation-resistant compared with other insects (Bloem et al., Reference Bloem, Carpenter and Hendrik2003; Thistlewood and Judd, Reference Thistlewood and Judd2019; Jiang et al., Reference Jiang, He, He, Zhao, Yang, Yang and Wu2022). Therefore, the radiation dose employed had to effect a compromise between the levels of sterility-induced males and their competitiveness in mating with wild moths (Bloem et al., Reference Bloem, Bloem, Carpenter and Calkins1999a, Reference Bloem, Bloem, Carpenter and Calkins1999b; Blomefield et al., Reference Blomefield, Bloem and Carpenter2010). In this study, we found that when irradiated males are mated with untreated females, the degree of sterility in the F1 progenies is higher at 366 Gy than 183 Gy, however, the codling moth SIT program is limited by the reduced competitiveness of irradiated males relative to non-irradiated males (table 3). Our results are congruent with the results reported by Bloem et al. (Reference Bloem, Bloem, Carpenter and Calkins2001, Reference Bloem, Carpenter, Bloem, Tomlin and Taggart2004), which demonstrated that codling moth mating competitiveness was reduced when irradiated by 60Co-γ at a higher dose of 250 Gy compared to 150 Gy. Our findings are also in line with the results reported by other researchers, who found that the use of low radiation doses (100–150 Gy) would achieve the compromise between the levels of sterility of female codling moths and their competitiveness in mating with wild moths (Anisimov, Reference Anisimov1993; Bloem et al., Reference Bloem, Bloem, Carpenter and Calkins1999a, Reference Bloem, Bloem, Carpenter and Calkins1999b), indicating that a reduction of radiation dose could increase the mating competitiveness of sterile moths. We also found that the fertility increased substantially when non-irradiated males were added (84.92 ± 6.31%), suggesting that the fertility defects of sterile males could be rescued in presence of fertile males or wild males. Although males are partially fertile or sub-sterile, the degree of sterility in their F1 progenies is higher than in the parental adults. This phenomenon is known as inherited sterility or F1 sterility (North, Reference North1975; Bloem et al., Reference Bloem, Bloem, Carpenter and Calkins1999a, Reference Bloem, Bloem, Carpenter and Calkins1999b). Therefore, the sterility of F1 progenies after males are irradiated at 183 Gy needs to be explored in more detail. Moreover, we believe that more doses of exposure and a large sample size are required to test before the transition from X-ray to massive field applications in the future.

Based on our findings in this study and the previously published work, an operational dose of <366 Gy of X-ray for future codling moth SIT programs in China is recommended. However, it is very important to perform other studies before field application of X-ray, including mating competitions in field cage, proportion of sterile males vs fertile females (laboratory and field studies), experiments of releasing sterile males at a reduced scale and monitor the percentage of fruit infestation. Currently, we are investigating the mechanisms of loss of mating competitiveness of irradiated codling moths and attempting to improve competitiveness via a series of rearing and acclimation studies, such as using insects that have gone through diapause (Dyck, Reference Dyck2010), or integration of probiotic microorganisms in the diet of larvae, which has been proved to be effective in Aedes albopictus (Chersoni et al., Reference Chersoni, Checcucci, Malfacini, Puggiol, Balestrino, Carrieri, Piunti, Dindo, Mattarelli and Bellini2021).

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the LiaoNing Revitalization Talents Program (XLYC1907097), the IAEA TC program (CPR5027), and the National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFD1400003). The authors are grateful to John Richard Schrock (Emporia State University, Emporia, KS, USA) for proofreading the manuscript.

Footnotes

*

These authors contributed equally to this work.

References

Agasyeva, IS, Ismailov, VY, Nastasiy, AS and Nefedova, MV (2021) Development of methods of biological control of apple moth (Cydia pomonella). The Research on Crops 22, 141–145.Google Scholar
Andreasen, MH and Curtis, CF (2005) Optimal life stage for radiation sterilization of Anopheles males and their fitness for release. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 19, 238–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anisimov, AI (1993) Study of the mechanism and possibilities of using F1 sterility for genetic control of codling moth. In: Proceedings: Radiation induced F1 sterility in Lepidoptera for area-wide control. Final Research Co-ordination Meeting, Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, 9-13 September 1991, Phoenix, AZ, USA. STI/PUB/929. IAEA, Vienna, Austria, pp. 135–155.Google Scholar
Bakri, A, Heather, N, Hendrichs, J and Ferris, I (2005 a) Fifty years of radiation biology in entomology: lessons learned from IDIDAS. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 98, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakri, A, Mehta, K and Lance, DR (2005 b) Sterilizing insects with ionizing radiation. In Dyck, VA, Hendrichs, J, Robinson, AS (eds), Sterile Insect Technique: Principles and Practice in Area-Wide Integrated Pest Management. Boca Raton, London, New York: CRC Press, pp. 355–398.Google Scholar
Bloem, KA and Bloem, S (1996) Codling moth eradication program in British Columbia: a review and update. In AliNiazee, MT, Long, LE (eds), Biology and Control of the Cherry Fruit Flies: A Worldwide Perspective. Oregon, USA: Agricultural Experiment Station, pp. 101–110.Google Scholar
Bloem, KA and Bloem, S (2000) Sterile insect technique for codling moth eradication in British Columbia, Canada. In Tan, K. H. (Ed.), Proceedings: Area-wide Control of Fruit Flies and Other Insect Pests, International Conference on Area-wide Control of Insect Pests and the 5th International Symposium on Fruit Flies of Economic Importance, 28 May – 5 June 1998, Penang, Malaysia. Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia. pp, 207–214.Google Scholar
Bloem, S, Bloem, KA, Carpenter, JE and Calkins, CO (1999 a) Inherited sterility in codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae): effect of substerilizing doses of radiation on field competitiveness. Environmental Entomology 28, 669–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloem, S, Bloem, KA, Carpenter, JE and Calkins, CO (1999 b) Inherited sterility in codling moth: effect of substerilizing doses of radiation on insect fecundity, fertility and control. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 92, 222–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloem, S, Bloem, KA, Carpenter, JE and Calkins, CO (2001) Season-long releases of partially sterile males for control of codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in Washington apples. Environmental Entomology 30, 763–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloem, B, Carpenter, JE and Hendrik, H (2003) Radiation biology and inherited sterility in false codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). The Journal of Economic Entomology 96, 1724–1731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloem, S, Carpenter, JE, Bloem, KA, Tomlin, L and Taggart, S (2004) Effect of rearing strategy and gamma radiation on field competitiveness of mass-reared codling moths (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). The Journal of Economic Entomology 97, 1891–1898.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloem, KA, Bloem, S and Carpenter, JE (2005) Impact of moth suppression/eradication programmes using the sterile insect technique or inherited sterility. In Dyck, VA, Hendrichs, J, Robinson, AS (eds), Sterile Insect Technique: Principles and Practice in Area-Wide Integrated Pest Management. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, pp. 677–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomefield, TL, Bloem, S and Carpenter, JE (2010) Effect of radiation on fecundity and fertility of codling moth Cydia pomonella (Linnaeus) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) from South Africa. The Journal of Applied Entomology 134, 216–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charmillot, PJ, Hofer, D and Pasquier, D (2000) Attract and kill: a new method for control of the codling moth Cydia pomonella. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 94, 211–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, GM, Chen, ZB, Ge, H, Yang, XQ and Wang, XQ (2020) Cloning and expression analysis of cytochrome P450 genes CYP332A19 and CYP337B19 in the codling moth, Cydia pomonella (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Acta Entomologica Sinica 63, 941–951, (In Chinese).Google Scholar
Chersoni, L, Checcucci, A, Malfacini, M, Puggiol, A, Balestrino, F, Carrieri, M, Piunti, I, Dindo, ML, Mattarelli, P and Bellini, R (2021) The possible role of microorganisms in mosquito mass rearing. Insects 12, 645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clements, AN (1992) The Biology of Mosquitoes, Vol. 1 Development, Nutrition and Reproduction. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Dyck, VA (2010) Rearing codling moth for the sterile insect technique. FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper. 199.Google Scholar
Dyck, VA, Hendrichs, J and Robinson, AS (eds) (2007) Sterile Insect Technique: Principles and Practice in Area-Wide Integrated Pest Management. Dordecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Fang, Y, Cai, M, Ke, X, Xing, JC, Yang, XQ and Wang, XQ (2018) Occurrence regularity of codling moth Cydia pomonella on pear fruits in Zhangwu County of Liaoning Province. Journal of Plant Protection 45, 724–730, (In Chinese).Google Scholar
Fezza, TJ, Follett, PA and Shelly, TE (2021) Effect of the timing of pupal irradiation on the quality and sterility of oriental fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) for use in sterile insect technique. Applied Entomology and Zoology 56, 443–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fried, M (1971) Determination of sterile-insect competitiveness. The Journal of Economic Entomology 64, 869–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, HH, Zhu, FW, Deng, YY, Weng, QF, Hu, MY and Zhang, TZ (2016) Development, reproduction and sexual competitiveness of Conopomorpha sinensis (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) gamma-irradiated as pupae and adults. Florida Entomologist 99, 66–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerfali, MM, Hamden, H, Fadhl, S, Marzouki, W, Raies, A and Chevrier, C (2011) Improvement of egg hatch of Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) for enhanced output. The Journal of Economic Entomology 104, 188–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, C, Wang, W, Ju, D, Chen, GM, Tan, XL, Mota-Sanchez, D and Yang, XQ (2020) Functional characterization of a novel λ-cyhalothrin metabolizing glutathione S-transferase, CpGSTe3, from the codling moth Cydia pomonella. Pest Management Science 76, 1039–1047.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Işci, M and Ay, R (2017) Determination of resistance and resistance mechanisms to thiacloprid in Cydia pomonella, L. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) populations collected from apple orchards in Isparta Province, Turkey. Crop Protection 91, 82–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, S, He, LM, He, W, Zhao, HY, Yang, XM, Yang, XQ and Wu, KM (2022) Effects of X-ray irradiation on the fitness of the established invasive pest fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda. Pest Management Science 78, 2806–2815. doi: 10.1002/ps.6903CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ju, D, Mota-Sanchez, D, Fuentes-Contreras, E, Zhang, YL, Wang, XQ and Yang, XQ (2021) Insecticide resistance in the Cydia pomonella (L): global status, mechanisms, and research directions. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 178, 104925.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knight, AL, Judd, GJR, Gilligan, T, Fuentes-Contreras, E and Walker, WB (2019) Integrated management of tortricid pests of tree fruit. Integrated management of diseases and insect pests of tree fruit. In Xu, XM, Fountain, M (eds), Integrated Management of Diseases and Insect Pests of Tree Fruit. London: Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing, pp. 375–422.Google Scholar
Knipple, DC (2013) Prospects for the use of transgenic approaches to improve the efficacy of the sterile insect technique (SIT) for control of the codling moth Cydia pomonella Linnaeus (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Crop Protection 44, 142–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, N, Zhao, HY, Chen, GM, Ju, D, Wei, ZH and Yang, XQ (2021) Effects of X-ray irradiation on the adult longevity and reproduction-related parameters of oriental fruit moth oriental fruit moth Grapholita molesta. Journal of Plant Protection 48, 501–576, (In Chinese).Google Scholar
Mastrangelo, T, Parker, AG, Jessup, A, Pereira, R, Orozco-Dávila, D, Islam, A, Dammalage, T and Walder, JMM (2010) A new generation of X ray irradiators for insect sterilization. The Journal of Economic Entomology 103, 85–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mohammed, M (2019) Development and reproduction of Trichogramma cacoeciae Marchal, 1927 (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) on Cydia pomonella (Linnaeus, 1758) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) eggs. The Polish Journal of Entomology 88, 25–39.Google Scholar
North, DT (1975) Inherited sterility in Lepidoptera. Annual Review of Entomology 20, 167–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
OK SIR (2011) OkanaganeKootenay Sterile Insect Release Program, FAQs for Understanding SIR in 2011. Available at http://www.oksir.org/docs/2011program.Google Scholar
Reyes, M, Franck, P, Charmillot, PJ, Ioriatti, C, Olivares, J, Pasqualini, E and Sauphanor, B (2007) Diversity of insecticide resistance mechanisms and spectrum in European populations of the codling moth, Cydia pomonella. Pest Management Science 63, 890–902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reyes, M, Franc, P, Olivares, J, Margaritopoulos, J, Knight, A and Sauphanor, B (2009) Worldwide variability of insecticide resistance mechanisms in the codling moth, Cydia pomonella L. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 99, 359–369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, AS, Cayol, JP and Hendrichs, J (2002) Recent findings on medfly sexual behavior: implications for SIT. Florida Entomologist 85, 171–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soleño, J, Parra-Morales, LB, Cichón, L, Garrido, S, Guiñazú, N and Montagna, CM (2020) Occurrence of pyrethroid resistance mutation in Cydia pomonella (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) throughout Argentina. Bulletin of Entomological Research 110, 201–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thistlewood, HMA and Judd, GJR (2019) Twenty-five years of research experience with the sterile insect technique and area-wide management of codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.), in Canada. Insects 10, 292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voudouris, CC, Sauphanor, B, Franck, P, Reyes, M, Mamuris, Z, Tsitsipis, JA, Vontas, J and Margaritopoulos, JT (2011) Insecticide resistance status of the codling moth Cydia pomonella (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) from Greece. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 100, 229–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wan, FH, Yin, CL, Tang, R, Wan, FH, Chen, MH, Wu, Q, Huang, C, Qian, WQ, Rota-Stabelli, O, Yang, NW, Wang, SP, Wang, GR, Zhang, GF, Guo, JY, Gu, LQ, Chen, LF, Xing, LS, Xi, Y, Liu, FL, Lin, KJ, Guo, MB, Liu, W, He, K, Tian, RZ, Jacquin-Joly, E, Franck, P, Siegwart, M, Ometto, L, Anfora, G, Blaxter, M, Meslin, C, Nguyen, P, Dalíková, M, Marec, F, Olivares, J, Maugin, S, Shen, JR, Liu, JD, Guo, JM, Luo, JP, Liu, B, Fan, W, Feng, LK, Zhao, XX, Peng, X, Wang, K, Liu, L, Zhan, HX, Liu, WX, Shi, GL, Jiang, CY, Jin, JS, Xian, XQ, Lu, S, Ye, ML, Li, MZ, Yang, ML, Xiong, RC, Walters, JR and Li, F (2019) A chromosome-level genome assembly of Cydia pomonella provides insights into chemical ecology and insecticide resistance. Nature Communications 10, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, W, Hu, C, Li, XR, Wang, XQ and Yang, XQ (2019) CpGSTd3 is a lambda-cyhalothrin metabolizing glutathione S-transferase from Cydia pomonella (L.). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 67, 1165–1172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wei, ZH, Liu, M, Hu, C and Yang, XQ (2020) Overexpression of glutathione S-transferase genes in field λ-cyhalothrin-resistant population of Cydia pomonella: reference gene selection and expression analysis. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 68, 5825–5834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witzgall, P, Stelinski, L, Gut, L and Thomson, D (2008) Codling moth management and chemical ecology. Annual Review of Entomology 53, 503–522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, XQ and Zhang, YL (2015) Investigation of insecticide-resistance status of Cydia pomonella in Chinese populations. Bulletin of Entomological Research 105, 316–325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, XQ, Zhang, YL, Wang, XQ, Dong, H, Gao, P and Jia, LY (2016) Characterization of multiple heat-shock protein transcripts from Cydia pomonella: their response to extreme temperature and insecticide exposure. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 64, 4288–4298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, XZ, Zhou, SL, Wang, YJ and Chen, YS (1957) Research on Yining Cydia pomonella and other fruit insect investigations. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences 14, 5–8.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. The X-ray irradiator used in this study. The irradiator (JYK-001 type) was independently developed by Hebi Jiaduoke Industry and Trade Co., Ltd, Hebi, China. (Left) Outside view of the X-ray irradiator and (Right) the platform for the manipulation of irradiation.

Figure 1

Table 1. Emergence rate of male pupae of C. pomonella irradiated with different irradiation doses of X-Ray

Figure 2

Figure 2. Effect of different irradiation doses on the fecundity of C. pomonella. 8-days-old males were treated with 0 (CK), 183, 366, and 549 Gy, and the eclosed adults were out-crossed to untreated adults. Three replicates, each with 10 males per dose were coupled with 10 virgin females. The results are shown as the mean ± SD. Error bars represent the standard errors calculated from three replicates. Letters on the error bars indicate significant differences analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Duncan's test (P < 0.05).

Figure 3

Figure 3. Effect of different irradiation doses on the fertility of C. pomonella. Male pupae from 1 day before emergence (8-day-old) were treated with 0 (CK), 183, 366, and 549 Gy, and the eclosed adults were out-crossed to untreated adults. Three replicates, each with 10 males per dose were coupled with 10 virgin females. The results are shown as the mean ± SD. Error bars represent the standard errors calculated from three replicates. Letters on the error bars indicate significant differences analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Duncan's test (P < 0.05).

Figure 4

Table 2. Effects of different X-Ray irradiation doses on the mating rate and mating frequency of C. pomonella

Figure 5

Figure 4. Survival curves of C. pomonella treated with different irradiation doses. Three replicates, each with 10 males per dose were coupled with 10 virgin females. Survival period data for each treatment were recorded and analyzed by ANOVA with Duncan's test (P < 0.05). (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article).

Figure 6

Table 3. Effect of X-Ray irradiation (366 Gy) on the mating competitiveness of C. pomonella adults