Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T14:40:48.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Compact modified hourglass-shaped aperture-coupled antenna for radar applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2023

P. Priyalatha*
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, BITS Pilani, Hyderabad Campus, Hyderabad, TG 500078, India
Runa Kumari
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, BITS Pilani, Hyderabad Campus, Hyderabad, TG 500078, India
Sourav Nandi
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, BITS Pilani, Hyderabad Campus, Hyderabad, TG 500078, India
*
Author for correspondence: P. Priyalatha, Email: p.priyalatha@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper furnishes a compact modified hourglass-shaped aperture-coupled antenna for radar applications. The effect of slots of various shapes and various slot lengths on the input impedance, radiation pattern, and gain of the antenna are analyzed. The proposed antenna, designed using a modified hourglass-shaped aperture, offers a gain of 8.214 dBi for an compact antenna with a dimension of 20.4 × 20.4 × 1.041 mm3 and an aperture area of 2.495 mm2. Implementation of this proposed modified hourglass-shaped aperture offers a high gain per unit radiating patch area of 40.26 dB/$\lambda _g ^2$ and a high gain per unit aperture area of 1324.84 dB/$\lambda _g ^2$. The proposed aperture feeds a circular patch which radiates at its resonant frequency of 10.5 GHz. The proposed design is fabricated and the simulated results are verified experimentally. Equivalent circuit analysis is also done. A measured gain of 7.2 dBi is observed at 10.5 GHz. The physical area of the antenna is reduced without compromising the gain by judiciously choosing the shape of slot with more degree of freedom for impedance matching. The proposed antenna is well suited for the unit cell of phased array antennas for X-band missile radar applications.

Information

Type
Antenna Design, Modelling and Measurements
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the European Microwave Association
Figure 0

Figure 1. ACMPA. (a) Exploded view. (b) Side view [W = L = 4 × a)].

Figure 1

Figure 2. Different slot shapes. (a) Rectangular slot. (b) H-shaped slot. (c) Bowtie slot. (d) Hourglass slot. (e) Modified hourglass slot [W2 = 1.43 mm, L1 = 2.86 mm, and W1 = 0.29 mm (for rectangular, H-shaped, bowtie, and hourglass slot) and 0.48 mm (for modified hourglass slot)].

Figure 2

Table 1. Final dimensions of antenna with different slot shapes obtained by parametric studies.

Figure 3

Figure 3. E-field distribution in modified hourglass-shaped aperture.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Surface current distribution on the ground plane with different types of aperture. (a) Rectangular slot. (b) H-shaped slot. (c) Bowtie slot. (d) Hourglass slot. (e) Modified hourglass slot.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Plot of |S11| parameter for various slot shapes.

Figure 6

Figure 6. x–z plane radiation pattern at 10.5 GHz for various slot shapes.

Figure 7

Figure 7. y–z plane radiation pattern at 10.5 GHz for various slot shapes.

Figure 8

Table 2. Comparison of simulated bandwidth and gain of antennas with different slot shapes

Figure 9

Figure 8. z locus Smith chart for slot shape analysis.

Figure 10

Figure 9. z locus Smith chart for slot length analysis.

Figure 11

Figure 10. Equivalent circuit model of the proposed antenna. (a) Feed and aperture dimensions in mm. (b) Schematic model.

Figure 12

Figure 11. Matched |S11| plot of equivalent circuit model with simulation.

Figure 13

Figure 12. Fabricated antenna. (a) Substrate with patch. (b) Ground plane with slot. (c) Substrate with feedline.

Figure 14

Figure 13. Measurement setup. (a) Test setup. (b) Antenna under test.

Figure 15

Figure 14. Measured and simulated |S11| plot.

Figure 16

Figure 15. Normalized radiation patterns at 10.5 GHz (simulated and measured). (a) x–z plane. (b) y–z plane.

Figure 17

Table 3. Comparison of various parameters of the proposed antenna with reported works