Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T13:06:17.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies on the protective efficacy of second-generation vaccine along with standard antileishmanial drug in Leishmania donovani infected BALB/c mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2013

JYOTI JOSHI
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India
SUKHBIR KAUR*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India
*
* Corresponding author: Parasitology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India. E-mail: puzoology@yahoo.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

It is well established that visceral leishmaniasis (VL; also known as Kala azar) causes immunosuppression, and a successful drug treatment is associated with the development of cell-mediated immunity. Therefore combining a drug with an immune enhancer can provide a better approach for the treatment of the disease. Keeping this in mind, the in vivo antileishmanial efficacy of immunochemotherapy was evaluated with the use of a 78 kDa antigen with or without monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL-A) along with a traditional drug sodium stibogluconate (SSG) in Leishmania donovani infected BALB/c mice. Mice were infected intracardially with promastigotes of L. donovani, and 30 days after infection, these animals were given specific immunotherapy (78 kDa/78 kDa+MPL-A) or chemotherapy (SSG) or immunochemotherapy (SSG+78 kDa/SSG+78 kDa+MPL-A). Animals were euthanased on 1, 15 and 30 post-treatment days. The antileishmanial potential of the immunochemotherapy was revealed by significant reduction in the parasite burden (P<0·001). These animals were also found to exhibit increased delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses, higher IgG2a levels, lower IgG1 levels and greater cytokine (IFN-γ and IL-2) concentrations compared with chemotherapy or immunotherapy alone, pointing towards the generation of a strong protective (Th1) type of immune response. Immunochemotherapy with SSG+78 kDa+MPL-A was found to be most effective in protecting mice against VL and therefore can be an alternative option for treatment of VL.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 
Figure 0

Table 1. Various groups used in the study

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Parasite load in terms of LDU in infected and drug treated mice on different post treatment days. The data are presented as mean±s.d. of six mice per group. (*) P value: Infected only vs Infected+78 kDa/Infected+78 kDa-MPL-A/Infected+SSG/Infected+SSG+78 kDa/Infected+SSG+78 kDa+MPL-A; (!, @) P value: Infected+SSG vs Infected+SSG+78 kDa/Infected+SSG+78 kDa +MPL-A; (α) P value: Infected+ 78 kDa vs Infected+SSG+78 kDa+MPL-A. (*), (!), (α) -(P<0·001); (@) –(P<0·05).

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Percentage increase in footpad thickness (DTH response) in infected and drug-treated mice on different post treatment days. The data are presented as mean±s.d. of six mice per group. (*) P value: Infected only vs Infected+78 kDa/Infected+78 kDa+MPL-A/Infected+SSG/Infected+SSG+78 kDa/Infected+SSG+78 kDa+MPL-A; (!) P value: Infected+SSG vs Infected+SSG+78 kDa/Infected +SSG+78 kDa +MPL-A; (α) P value: Infected+ 78 kDa vs Infected+SSG+78 kDa +MPL-A. (*), (!), (α) -(P<0·001).

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Levels of Leishmania-specific IgG antibodies in serum samples of BALB/c mice. A –IgG2a, B – IgG1. The data are presented as mean±s.d. of six mice per group. (*) P value: Infected only vs Infected+78 kDa/Infected+78 kDa+MPL-A/Infected+SSG/Infected+SSG+78 kDa/Infected+SSG+78 kDa+MPL-A; (!) P value: Infected+SSG vs Infected+SSG+78 kDa/Infected +SSG+78 kDa +MPL-A; (α) P value: Infected+ 78 kDa vs Infected+SSG+78 kDa +MPL-A. (*), (!), (α) -(P<0·001).

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Effect of treatment on A – IFN-γ, B –IL-2 cytokine levels of BALB/c mice. The data are presented as mean±s.d. of six mice per group. (*, #) P value: Infected only vs Infected+78 kDa/Infected+78 kDa+MPL-A/Infected+SSG/Infected+SSG+78 kDa/Infected+SSG+78 kDa+MPL-A; (!, @) P value: Infected+SSG vs Infected+SSG+78 kDa/Infected +SSG+78 kDa +MPL-A; (α) P value: Infected+ 78 kDa vs Infected+SSG+78 kDa +MPL-A. (*), (!), (α) -(P<0·001); (#), (@) –(P<0·05).

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Effect of treatment on A -IL-10, B –IL-4 cytokine levels of BALB/c mice. The data are presented as mean±s.d. of six mice per group. (*) P value: Infected only vs Infected+78 kDa/Infected+78 kDa+MPL-A/Infected+SSG/Infected+SSG+78 kDa/Infected+SSG+78 kDa+MPL-A; (!, @) P value: Infected+SSG vs Infected+SSG+78 kDa/Infected +SSG+78 kDa +MPL-A; (α) P value: Infected+ 78 kDa vs Infected+SSG+78 kDa +MPL-A. (*), (!), (α) -(P<0·001); (@) –(P<0·05).