Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T15:22:01.731Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microstructure and phase evolution in spark plasma sintering of the NbCr2 Laves phase matrix composite toughened with ductile Cr phase

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2018

Kewei Li*
Affiliation:
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China
Fei Gao
Affiliation:
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China
Lu Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Precision Instruments, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: lkw917@126.com

Abstract

A bulk NbCr2 Laves phase matrix composite toughened with ductile Cr phase has been fabricated by spark plasma sintering (SPS) using pre-alloyed NbCr2 and Cr powders. The sintering behaviour and phase morphological evolution of the sintered alloy were investigated. The results show that a series of microstructure evolutions along the sintering temperature occurred: elongated Cr phase with uniform dispersion of fine NbCr2 and Cr phase → coarse Cr phase with matured fine NbCr2 and Cr → coarse Cr and Nb phases with lamellar eutectics. The microstructural evolution and phase transformation along the sintering temperature are analyzed by considering the inhomogenous temperature distribution and the accelerated atomic diffusion due to the pulsed electric current applied during SPS. The room temperature fracture toughness of the sintered samples is expected to be markedly improved due to the absence of lamellar or the occurrence of ductile Cr and Nb phases.

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 
Figure 0

FIG. 1. BSE images of NbCr2 (a) and Cr (b) powders showing the powder morphology.

Figure 1

FIG. 2. Schematic of the cutting plane for SEM and TEM observations.

Figure 2

FIG. 3. (a) Bright-field TEM image of the milled NbCr2 powders, (b) and (c) the corresponding EDS spectra and SADP of the area denoted in (a), respectively, (d) the HRTEM image of NbCr2 powders with corresponding IFFT (e) and FFT (f) images.

Figure 3

FIG. 4. BSE images of the Nb–Cr eutectic alloy sintered at different temperatures using Cr and NbCr2 powders: (a) and (b) 1473 K; (c) and (d) 1573 K; (e) and (f) 1673 K.

Figure 4

FIG. 5. BSE images of the two types of eutectics present in the sample sintered at 1673 K: (a) Cr/NbCr2 eutectic; (b) Nb/NbCr2 eutectic.

Figure 5

FIG. 6. Bright field TEM images of the samples sintered at different temperatures: (a) and (b) 1473 K; (c) 1573 K; (d) 1673 K.

Figure 6

FIG. 7. (a) Bright field TEM image of the sample sintered at 1573 K, (b) and (c) the EDS spectra of the areas A and B denoted in (a), respectively, (d) and (e) the corresponding SAED patterns of areas A and B denoted in (a), respectively, (f) HRTEM of the area NbCr2/Cr interface in (a), (g), and (h), the IFFT images of areas D and E denoted in (f), respectively, (i), (j), and (k) the FFT images of areas D, E, and F denoted in (f), respectively.

Figure 7

FIG. 8. The calculated temperature distribution during SPS.

Figure 8

FIG. 9. Sketch illustrating the formation of Nbss, Crss, and NbCr2 Laves phase when sintered with Cr and NbCr2 powders: (a) prior to SPS; (b) the formation of local melting and DRX of NbCr2 powder; (c) the nucleation of Crss and Nbss; (d) the growth of Crss and Nbss.