Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-kwdml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T19:48:45.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Determination of areal surface-feature coverage in the BeaufortSea using aircraft video data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Mark A. Tschudi
Affiliation:
Program in Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, CO 80309-0429 U.S.A.
Judith A. Curry
Affiliation:
Program in Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, CO 80309-0429 U.S.A.
James A. Maslanik
Affiliation:
Program in Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, CO 80309-0429 U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The surface-energy budget of the Arctic Ocean depends on the distribution ofvarious sea-ice features that form by both mechanical and thermodynamicprocesses. Melt ponds, new ice and open water greatly affect thedetermination of surface albedo. However, even basic measurements of somesurface-feature characteristics, such as areal extent of melt ponds, remainrare.

A method has been developed to assess the areal coverage of melt ponds, newice and open water using video data from the Beaufort and Arctic StormsExperiment (BASE). A downward-looking video camera mounted on the undersideof a Hercules C-130 aircraft provided clear images of the surface. Imagesacquired over multi-year ice on 21 September 1994 were analyzed using aspectral technique to determine the areal coverage of melt ponds, new iceand open water. Statistics from this analysis were then compared to previousfield studies and to the Schramm and others (in press) sea-ice model.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1997
Figure 0

Table 1.Image set used to compute fractional area coverages of sea-ice surface-Features

Figure 1

Fig. 1.Spectral albedo observed over partially refrozen melt pond with 3 cm of ice, overcast. From Grenfell and Maykut (1977).

Figure 2

Fig. 2.View of the surface, as videotaped from the underside of a C-130 aircraft during BASE.

Figure 3

Fig. 3.Spectral identification of frozen melt ponds (red), new ice (blue) and open water (green) after processing Figure 2.

Figure 4

Table 2.Surface-feature areal coverage computed using spectral thresholding. The number of images in each section is given in Table 1

Figure 5

Fig. 4.Melt ponds that have penetrated through the underlying ice pack.

Figure 6

Fig. 5.Spectral identification of frozen melt ponds that hare penetrated through the underlying ice pack. Holes through the pack are in green and the remainder of the pond is in red.

Figure 7

Table 3.Melt-pond morphology (% coverage)