Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T09:49:24.798Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Using cover crops to offset greenhouse gas emissions from a tropical soil under no-till

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2021

João Paulo Gonsiorkiewicz Rigon*
Affiliation:
São Paulo State University, UNESP, College of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Crop Science, Botucatu-SP, Brazil
Juliano Carlos Calonego
Affiliation:
São Paulo State University, UNESP, College of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Crop Science, Botucatu-SP, Brazil
Laércio Augusto Pivetta
Affiliation:
Federal University of Paraná, UFPR, Department of Agronomic Sciences, Palotina-PR, Brazil
Gustavo Castoldi
Affiliation:
Goiano Federal Institute, IF Goiano, Department of Agriculture, Rio Verde-GO, Brazil
Juan Piero Antonio Raphael
Affiliation:
São Paulo State University, UNESP, College of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Crop Science, Botucatu-SP, Brazil
Ciro Antônio Rosolem
Affiliation:
São Paulo State University, UNESP, College of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Crop Science, Botucatu-SP, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author. Email: jp.rigon@unesp.br
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Crop rotations under no-till (NT) have been a strategy to increase soil organic carbon (SOC) and mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, enhancing the cropping system efficiency. However, there is still controversy on the role of grasses and legumes, and species diversity and their impacts. This study aimed to assess the GHG emissions, SOC, and Nitrogen (TN) in a soybean production system managed under NT in rotation with different species in the fall–winter and the spring seasons. Main plots during the fall–winter were (1) Triticale (x Triticosecale) and (2) Sunflower (Helianthus annuus). Subplots established in the spring were (a) Sunn hemp (Crotalaria juncea), (b) Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), (c) Pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum), plus a (d) Fallow treatment. Soybean was grown every year in the summer, in sub-subplots. The GHG emission was affected according to crop species. In the spring, Sunn hemp emitted more nitrous oxide (N2O) (0.82 kg ha−1) than fallow (0.58 kg ha−1); however, the high C and N inputs by the legume and also other cover crop residues reduced the relative emissions compared with fallow. Growing pearl millet or Sunn hemp as a spring cover crop increases SOC by 7% on average compared with fallow. The N2O emission of Sunn hemp accounted for only 0.28% of the total N accumulated in the legume residues, notably lower than IPCC estimates. In the fall–winter, Triticale increased SOC by 7%, decreased CO2 emission by 18%, and emitted 20% lower GHG to produce the same soybean yield compared with sunflower. Soybean rotation with triticale in fall–winter and Sunn hemp or pearl millet in spring decreases GHG emissions. Our results indicate that the right choice of species in rotation with soybean under NT increases SOC and may offset GHG emissions from tropical soils. It may be an important tool in mitigating potential global warming.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Scheme of experimental design of crop rotation according to fall–winter and spring treatments: Sunflower/Pearl millet, Sunflower/Forage sorghum, Sunflower/Sunn hemp, Sunflower/Fallow, Triticale/Pearl millet, Triticale/Forage sorghum, Triticale/Sunn hemp, Triticale/Fallow. Soybean is the main crop in the summer.

Figure 1

Table 1. Biochemical compositions of the crops used in the rotations

Figure 2

Figure 2. Dry matter (a), carbon (b), and nitrogen (c) are accumulated from residues on the soil surface, according to crop rotations in each growing season. Letters in the columns differ from each other by the t-test (p < 0.05) of the cumulative values, and the vertical bars correspond to LSD (p < 0.05).

Figure 3

Table 2. Soil organic carbon (SOC) and total soil nitrogen (TN) concentrations at 0–0.1 m soil depth, cumulative greenhouse gases (C-CO2, C-CH4, and N2O-N), relative N2O-N and C-CO2 emissions, and greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI) according to the fall-winter and spring crops.

Figure 4

Figure 3. N2O-N (a), C-CH4 (b), C-CO2 emissions (c), water-filled pore space (d), and soil temperature at 5 cm depth (e) of the crop rotations. Vertical bars correspond to the standard error of the mean.

Supplementary material: File

Rigon et al. supplementary material

Rigon et al. supplementary material

Download Rigon et al. supplementary material(File)
File 19.1 KB