Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T12:20:40.359Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Three-dimensional geometry and topology effects in viscous streaming

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2022

Fan Kiat Chan
Affiliation:
Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
Yashraj Bhosale
Affiliation:
Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
Tejaswin Parthasarathy
Affiliation:
Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
Mattia Gazzola*
Affiliation:
Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA National Center for Supercomputing Applications, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: mgazzola@illinois.edu

Abstract

Recent studies on viscous streaming flows in two dimensions have elucidated the impact of body curvature variations on resulting flow topology and dynamics, with opportunities for microfluidic applications. Following that, we present here a three-dimensional characterization of streaming flows as functions of changes in body geometry and topology, starting from the well-known case of a sphere to progressively arrive at toroidal shapes. We leverage direct numerical simulations and dynamical systems theory to systematically analyse the reorganization of streaming flows into a dynamically rich set of regimes, the origins of which are explained using bifurcation theory.

Information

Type
JFM Papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Streaming physics: Comparison of time-averaged streamline patterns depicting regions of clockwise (blue) and counter-clockwise (orange) recirculating fluid for an oscillating (a) circular cylinder ($R_s = 0.628$, $\delta _{AC} / a = 0.126$) and (b) sphere ($R_s = 1.6$, $\delta _{AC} / a = 0.158$) in the finite-thickness DC layer regime against experiments by Van Dyke (1982) and Kotas et al. (2007), respectively. The centre of the inner vortex (pink marker) is observed at $45^{\circ }$ and $54.7^{\circ }$ from the axis of oscillation for the cylinder and sphere, respectively, consistent with the theory of Lane (1955). Quantitative comparison with experiments and theory in which we relate the normalized DC layer thickness $\delta _{DC} / a$ and normalized AC boundary layer thickness $\delta _{AC} / a$ is illustrated in (c) for an oscillating cylinder (Bertelsen, Svardal & Tjotta 1973; Lutz et al.2005; Parthasarathy et al.2019) and (d) for oscillating spheroids of varying aspect ratios $AR$ (Kotas et al.2007). For spheroids, the DC layer thickness (marked in red in inset) is defined as the average distance from the body surface to the stagnation points (saddles) perpendicular to the oscillation direction. The body length scale $a_{eq}$ for a spheroid is defined as the radius of an equivalent sphere of the same volume. The two-headed arrows in all subfigures indicate the direction of oscillation. (e–j) Critical points and corresponding local flow patterns in 3-D incompressible flows. Simulation details: adaptive domain size with uniform grid spacing $h = 1/2048$ (body length scale $a = 0.02$); penalization factor $\lambda = 10^4$; mollification length $\epsilon _{moll} = 2\sqrt {2}h$; Lagrangian Courant–Friedrichs–Lewy number $LCFL=0.01$; viscosity $\nu$ and oscillation frequency $\omega$ set according to prescribed $\delta _{AC} / a$; and non-dimensional oscillation amplitude $\epsilon = 0.05$. The above values are used throughout the text, unless stated otherwise. For more details on these parameters, we refer to Gazzola et al. (2011).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Streaming flow for a fully symmetric body (sphere of radius $a$) in the (a,b) Stokes-like ($\delta _{AC} / a = 0.35$) regime and (c,d) finite-thickness DC layer ($\delta _{AC} / a = 0.18$) regime. The visualization of the flow field is presented using two different methods: Stokes stream function (left column) and dynamical system representation (right column). The 2-D in-plane centres, 2-D in-plane saddles, stable and unstable NSS (half-saddles/NSS on solid boundaries) are marked as pink, yellow, blue and red circles, respectively. Colour contours on the presented plane indicate regions of clockwise (blue) and counter-clockwise (orange) recirculating fluid. The 3-D surfaces are generated from the Stokes stream function $\psi$, while colour coding is mapped to three dimensions as $\psi \sin {\phi }$, where $\phi$ is the azimuthal angle, consistent with Lane (1955). Simulation details: normalized uniform grid spacing $h / a = 0.03$.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Streaming from an axisymmetric body (spheroid of radii ratio $a_x : a_y : a_z = 0.4a : a : a$, where $a = 0.05$): starting from the (a,b) Stokes-like regime ($\delta _{AC} / a = 0.076$), decreasing $\delta _{AC} / a$ transitions the flow topology into (c,d) a new phase ($\delta _{AC} / a = 0.065$) where regions of recirculating fluid are encapsulated between pairs of stable–unstable NSS (shaded boxes). Further decrease in $\delta _{AC} / a$ transitions the flow topology into the (e,f) finite-thickness DC layer regime ($\delta _{AC} / a = 0.053$). Flow fields are represented using two different methods: Stokes stream function (a,c,e) and dynamical system representation (b,d,f). Colour contours on the presented plane indicate regions of clockwise (blue) and counter-clockwise (orange) recirculating fluid. The 3-D surfaces are generated from the Stokes stream function $\psi$, while colour coding is mapped to three dimensions as $\psi \sin {\phi }$, where $\phi$ is the azimuthal angle, consistent with Lane (1955). Simulation details: normalized uniform grid spacing $h / a = 0.02$.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Evolution of streaming flow topology for an oscillating spheroid (with radii ratio $a_x : a_y : a_z = a : a : 0.25a$, where $a = 0.05$). We observe seven distinct phases, classified based on critical points and local flow trajectories, from Stokes-like regime (Phase  I) to finite-thickness layer regime (Phase  VII). Bifurcation diagrams in the insets summarize the transition from one phase to another, tracking stable/unstable (solid/dashed lines) branches as well as type of involved critical points, as a function of the bifurcation parameter $\delta _{AC} / a$. Axes are indicated at the bottom right, where the orange $x$-axis represents the axis of oscillation. Simulation details: normalized uniform grid spacing $h / a = 0.03$ (used throughout § 5).

Figure 4

Figure 5. Phase VI $\rightarrow$ VII: streaming flow structures (a) before and (b) after transition. The corresponding steady-state flow trajectories on the highlighted planes are shown in the insets, illustrating critical points coming together on one axis, and splitting away on another – a feature characteristic of higher-order elliptic reflecting umbilic bifurcations (Bosschaert & Hanßmann 2013). (c) Flow converges to the finite-thickness layer regime upon further decrease in $\delta _{AC} / a$.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Streaming flow topology at different $\delta _{AC} / a$ for a torus, with axis of symmetry aligned along the $z$-axis, oscillating along the $x$-axis. The torus has tube radius $a_{tube} = 0.25 a$ and core radius $a_{core} = 0.75 a$, so that the overall body length scale is $a = a_{tube} + a_{core}$. We highlight here that the torus has major ($a_{max} = a$) and minor ($a_{min} = a_{tube} = 0.25 a$) length scales comparable to those of the 3-D spheroid in § 5, essentially presenting equivalent width and thickness. Simulation details: normalized uniform grid spacing $h / a = 0.03$.

Supplementary material: File

Chan et al. supplementary material

Chan et al. supplementary material

Download Chan et al. supplementary material(File)
File 63.4 MB