Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T05:31:20.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Co-phylogeography and morphological evolution of sika deer lice (Damalinia sika) with their hosts (Cervus nippon)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2012

ATSUSHI MIZUKOSHI
Affiliation:
Systematic Entomology, Graduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8589, Japan
KEVIN P. JOHNSON
Affiliation:
Illinois Natural History Survey, University of Illinois, Champaign, IL 61820, USA
KAZUNORI YOSHIZAWA*
Affiliation:
Systematic Entomology, Graduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8589, Japan
*
*Corresponding author: Systematic Entomology, Graduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8589, Japan. Tel: +81 11 706 2424. Fax: +81 11 706 4939. E-mail: psocid@res.agr.hokudai.ac.jp
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Lice are obligate parasites of mammals and birds and have become an important model for studies of host-parasite co-evolution and co-phylogenetics. Population genetic and phylogeographic studies represent an important bridge between microevolution and co-phylogenetic patterns. We examine co-phylogeographic patterns in sika deer and their parasitic lice. Co-phylogeographic patterns in deer and lice were evaluated using homologous regions of mitochondrial COI sequences. The phylogeographic breaks recovered for deer populations matched those of previous studies. Comparisons of the phylogeographic tree topology for deer lice with that of their hosts revealed a significant level of congruence. However, comparisons of genetic distances between deer and lice suggested that one of the estimated co-divergence events is more likely a recent host switch. Taking into account genetic divergence, there is not strong evidence for complete phylogeographic co-divergence between deer and their parasitic lice. However, mitochondrial phylogenies only track genetic structure of female lineages, and the incongruence between deer and louse phylogeography may be explained by louse migration mediated by male deer. Morphological analysis of head shape variation based on an elliptic Fourier descriptor showed that overall morphological variation contained phylogenetic signal, suggesting that in general morphology of these lice evolves congruent to population history.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Map of collecting sites for sika deer and lice. Circles indicate the collection sites, with different colours showing different louse clades. For numbers of deer and lice samples from each locality, see Table 1.

Figure 1

Table 1. List of the samples used in this study

(Abbreviated labels corresponding to those indicated in the figures.)
Figure 2

Fig. 2. Phylogenetic tree of sika deer individuals estimated using maximum likelihood. Branch lengths are proportional to substitutions per site. Numbers associated with each branch indicate MP bootstrap/ ML bootstrap/ Bayesian posterior probabilities. Shades indicate haplotype group names used for Figs 4 and 5. Numbers in circles indicate co-divergence points corresponding to those in Fig. 3. See also Figs 4–6.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Phylogenetic tree of deer lice estimated using maximum likelihood. Branch lengths are proportional to substitutions per site. Numbers associated with each branch indicate MP bootstrap/ ML bootstrap/ Bayesian posterior probabilities. Shades indicate haplotype group names used for Figs 4 and 5. Numbers in circles indicate co-divergence points corresponding to those in Fig. 2. Broken-line circles indicate samples from Kyushu and adjunct islands. See also Figs 4–6.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Tanglegram of deer and louse trees with lines connecting host-parasite associations.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Optimal Jungle reconstruction using TreeMap2. Note that two host switch events indicated by asterisks were added by hand, because of the inability of Jungles analysis to deal with parasite lineages occurring on multiple host lineages. Labels for louse are distinguished from deer by a “p” heading. See text for detailed explanation.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Plots of uncorrected pairwise distances estimated from deer and louse COI sequences. Shadings indicate deer and lice divergence events as noted on left and lower margins. Dashed outlines and associated letters indicate plot groups as discussed in the text. Numbers in circles indicate co-divergence points corresponding to those in Figs 2, 3 and 5.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Illustration of shape variation in louse head morphology, with variation contained within each of the first four principal components indicated.

Figure 8

Fig. 8. Dendrogram resulting from cluster analysis of the louse head shape principal components. Terminal labels indicate louse collection site (left), their host subspecies (represented by first three letters of subspecific epithet: middle), and the mitochondrial lineages for each louse population (right).

Supplementary material: File

Mizukoshi Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material_1-5.zip

Download Mizukoshi Supplementary Material(File)
File 11.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Mizukoshi Supplementary Material

Supplementary Data.xls

Download Mizukoshi Supplementary Material(File)
File 22.7 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Mizukoshi Supplementary Material

Figure1.pdf

Download Mizukoshi Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 85.1 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Mizukoshi Supplementary Material

Figure2.pdf

Download Mizukoshi Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 76.9 KB