Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-kv2lp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T07:22:48.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pre-operative prediction of ‘dry taps’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2008

S Henney*
Affiliation:
Senior House Officer, Department of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, Cumberland Infirmary, Carlisle, UK
P Counter
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, Specialist Registrar James Cook Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
S Mirza
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, Specialist Registrar James Cook Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
P Gedling
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, Statistician Bishop Auckland General Hospital, Bishop Auckland, UK
C Watson
Affiliation:
Consultant ENT Surgeon ENT Department, Darlington Memorial Hospital, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Mr S Henney, ENT Dept., City Hospital, Dudley Road, Birmingham, Wesd Midlands, B18 7QH Fax:  +44 (0)121 353 5432 E-mail: scott.henney@doctors.org.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives:

The treatment of children with ‘glue ear’ often presents surgeons with the question of whether or not to insert a grommet when myringotomy reveals no fluid in the middle ear. We present a study designed to assess which factors contribute to the presence of a ‘dry tap’.

Design:

We prospectively gathered data from a cohort of 280 children (504 myringotomies). The cohort included two subgroups, one received halothane and nitrous oxide anaesthesia, and the other received enflurane anaesthesia.

Setting:

The ENT department of a district general hospital.

Participants:

Children (aged less than 17 years) requiring myringotomy.

Main outcome measures:

The presence of a ‘glue’ or dry tap at myringotomy was documented. We also recorded data on the following: pre- and post-induction tympanometry; age; season; anaesthetic type; and the delay from listing to actual operation.

Results:

A non type B pre-induction tympanogram and delay to operation were strong indications of finding a dry tap at surgery.

Conclusions:

In our study population, the proportion of dry taps at myringotomy was 18 per cent. The presence of a dry tap was rarely due to the induction of anaesthesia. Multivariate analysis revealed that the combination of factors most likely to predict a dry tap were non type B tympanogram and delay to operation.

Information

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2008
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Dry tap rate vs delay to operation.

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Myringotomy findings related to anaesthetic agent.

Figure 2

Table I Changes in tympanometry findings following anaesthetic induction

Figure 3

Table II Myringotomy findings related to pre-induction tympanometry result

Figure 4

Table III Myringotomy findings related to post-induction tympanometry result

Figure 5

Table IV Tympanometry statistics

Figure 6

Table V Logistic regression analysis predicting a dry tap: 3 factors

Figure 7

Table VI Statistics for prediction of middle-ear fluid: 3-factor logistic regression equation

Figure 8

Table VII Logistic regression analysis predicting a dry tap: 2 factors

Figure 9

Table VIII Statistics for prediction of middle-ear fluid: 2-factor logistic regression equation

Figure 10

Table IX Dry taps resulting from anaesthesia

Figure 11

Table X Likelihood of unnecessary intervention with time