Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T21:17:07.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Impact of natural control agents of the citrus leafminer Phyllocnistis citrella on lemon trees varies among seasons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2015

L. Goane*
Affiliation:
Facultad de Agronomía y Zootecnia, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas – CONICET, Tucumán, Argentina
A. Casmuz
Affiliation:
Estación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres, Sección Zoología Agrícola – EEAOC, Tucumán, Argentina
H. Salas
Affiliation:
Estación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres, Sección Zoología Agrícola – EEAOC, Tucumán, Argentina
E. Willink
Affiliation:
Estación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres, Sección Zoología Agrícola – EEAOC, Tucumán, Argentina
A. Mangeaud
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales – FCEFN, Córdoba, Argentina
G. Valladares
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales – FCEFN, Córdoba, Argentina Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal – IMBIV (CONICET), Córdoba, Argentina
*
* Author for correspondence Phone: (54) 381-439-0003 E-mail: lugoane@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies on insect natural enemies and their effects on host populations are of immense practical value in pest management. Predation and parasitism on a citrus pest, the leafminer Phyllocnistis citrella Stainton, were evaluated by sampling over 3 years in four locations within a world leading lemon producing area in Northwest Argentina. Both mortality factors showed seasonal trends consistent across locations, with predation exerting earlier and more sustained pressure than parasitism, which showed wider seasonal variations. The dominant parasitoids, native Cirrospilus neotropicus and introduced Ageniaspis citricola, showed different seasonal trends: C. neotropicus was dominant in spring whereas A. citricola superseded it in autumn and winter. Although parasitism rates were relatively low, the native C. neotropicus revealed favourable features as potential control agent, by showing density-dependence, parasitism rates comparable with those of the specific A. citricola during part of the cycle, and earlier synchronization with the host. The study provides highly relevant information for a sustainable management of this worldwide pest, for which biological control is considered the best long-term option.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Fluctuations (numbers in 100 leaves) of CLM population and main mortality factors (CLM preyed, parasitized and dead from unknown causes) throughout 3 consecutive years in four locations from NW Argentina. Seasons are indicated as: Spring (Spr), Summer (Smr), Autumn (Aut) and Winter (Win).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Annual mean density (number of mines per leaf) and total mortality (as % of all mines) of CLM in four locations from NW Argentina. Relative rates (as % from all dead individuals) of each mortality factor are represented within each column.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Seasonal predation and parasitism rates (% of miners ± SE) on CLM, from 3-year sampling in NW Argentina. Data of the four locations were averaged and vertical bars denote SE (location effects were not significant according to GLMM, see table 1). Means accompanied by different letters are significantly different (GLMM contrast, P < 0.05). Average CLM density is also included for illustration.

Figure 3

Table 1. Results of GLMMs analysing mortality rates due to predation and parasitism (mortality factor) on CLM populations, considering variations among seasons and locations.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Seasonal parasitism rates (%) by A. citricola and C. neotropicus on CLM, from 3-year sampling in NW Argentina. Data of the four locations were averaged and vertical bars denote SE (location effects were not significant according to GLMM, see table 2). Means accompanied by different letters are significantly different (GLMM contrast, P < 0.05). Average CLM density is also included for illustration.

Figure 5

Table 2. Results of GLMMs analysing parasitism rates caused by A. citricola and C. neotropicus on CLM considering variations among season and locations.

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Regression analysis between preyed (white points) and parasitized (black points) mines to the CLM density. Data from three consecutive citrus growing seasons: La Ramada (parasitism y = 7.88 + 11.96x, R2 = 0.10; predation y = 14.12 + 10.68x, R2 = 0.05), La Granja (parasitism y = 9.06 + 10.06x, R2 = 0.04; predation y = 8.74 + 32.27x, R2 = 0.29), Famaillá (parasitism y = 8.91 + 7.86x, R2 = 0.03; predation y = 11.15 + 25.25x, R2 = 0.25) and Alberdi (predation y = 10.41 + 24.47x, R2 = 0.20).

Figure 7

Table 3. Results of regression analyses of parasitism rates (%) by introduced (A. citricola) and native parasitoids vs. CLM density.