Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T03:51:29.939Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Atomic resolution electron tomography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2016

Sara Bals
Affiliation:
Electron Microscopy for Materials Research Laboratory, University of Antwerp, Belgium; sara.bals@uantwerpen.be
Bart Goris
Affiliation:
Electron Microscopy for Materials Research Laboratory, University of Antwerp, Belgium; bart.goris@uantwerpen.be
Annick De Backer
Affiliation:
Electron Microscopy for Materials Research Laboratory, University of Antwerp, Belgium; annick.debacker@uantwerpen.be
Sandra Van Aert
Affiliation:
Electron Microscopy for Materials Research Laboratory, University of Antwerp, Belgium; sandra.vanaert@uantwerpen.be
Gustaaf Van Tendeloo
Affiliation:
Electron Microscopy for Materials Research Laboratory, University of Antwerp, Belgium; staf.vantendeloo@uantwerpen.be

Abstract

Over the last two decades, three-dimensional (3D) imaging by transmission electron microscopy or “electron tomography” has evolved into a powerful tool to investigate a variety of nanomaterials in different fields, such as life sciences, chemistry, solid-state physics, and materials science. Most of these results were obtained with nanometer-scale resolution, but different approaches have recently pushed the resolution to the atomic level. Such information is a prerequisite to understand the specific relationship between the atomic structure and the physicochemical properties of (nano)materials. We provide an overview of the latest progress in the field of atomic-resolution electron tomography. Different imaging and reconstruction approaches are presented, and state-of-the-art results are discussed. This article demonstrates the power and importance of electron tomography with atomic-scale resolution.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a–b) Refined models for two high-angle annular dark-field-scanning transmission electron microscope projection images of a nano-sized Ag cluster embedded in an Al matrix. (c–d) Number of Ag atoms per projected atomic column for both images. (e) 3D reconstruction of the Ag nanoparticle, based on discrete tomography.12

Figure 1

Figure 2. (a) Slices through a 3D reconstruction of an Au nanorod showing the atomic lattice. (b) Corresponding slices through the strain field along the major axis of the nanorod, indicating an outward relaxation at the tip of the nanorod. (c) 3D visualization of a core–shell Au@Ag nanorod, where the Au core is rendered orange, and the Ag atoms are visualized in blue.20,22

Figure 2

Figure 3. (a–c) 3D visualizations of the reconstruction showing the atomic lattice of an Au nanodecahedron rotated over 0°, 45°, and 90° around the y-axis. The insets display the 3D model of the morphology. (d,f) ɛxx and ɛzz strain field showing surface relaxation in both directions. The color scale indicates the expansion of the lattice parameter with respect to a reference. (e,g) This surface relaxation was confirmed by measuring the lattice parameter on slices through the reconstructions at the positions indicated in (d) and (f).27

Figure 3

Figure 4. The left column illustrates the counting results obtained for three different configurations of a single ultrasmall Ge cluster, consisting of <25 atoms. Green, red, and blue dots correspond to the presence of one, two, and three atoms, respectively. The 3D results of the ab initio calculations are illustrated at the right along different viewing directions, showing a planar base structure.31