Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T17:35:50.304Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The potential of herbaceous native Australian legumes as grain crops: a review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2010

Lindsay W. Bell*
Affiliation:
CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, PO Box 102, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.
Richard G. Bennett
Affiliation:
School of Plant Biology M084, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
Megan H. Ryan
Affiliation:
School of Plant Biology M084, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
Heather Clarke
Affiliation:
Centre for Legumes in Mediterranean Agriculture (CLIMA), University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
*
*Corresponding author: Lindsay.Bell@csiro.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Many agricultural systems around the world are challenged by declining soil resources, a dry climate and increases in input costs. The cultivation of plants that are better adapted than current crop species to nutrient poor soils, a dry climate and low-input agricultural systems would aid the continued profitability and environmental sustainability of agricultural systems. This paper examines herbaceous native Australian legumes for their capacity to be developed as grain crops adapted to dry environments. The 14 genera that contain herbaceous species are Canavalia, Crotalaria, Cullen, Desmodium, Glycine, Glycyrrhiza, Hardenbergia, Indigofera, Kennedia, Lotus, Rhynchosia, Swainsona, Trigonella and Vigna. A number of these genera (e.g., Glycine, Crotalaria, Trigonella and Vigna) include already cultivated exotic grain legumes. Species were evaluated based on the extent to which their natural distribution corresponded to arid and semi-arid climatic regions, as well as the existing information on traits related to harvestability (uniformity of ripening, propensity to retain pod, pod shattering and growth habit), grain qualities (seed size, chemistry, color and the absence of toxins) and fecundity. Published data on seed yield were rare, and for many other traits information was limited. The Australian species of Vigna, Canavalia and Desmodium mainly have tropical distributions and were considered poorly suited for semi-arid temperate cropping systems. Of the remaining genera Glycyrrhiza and Crotalaria species showed many suitable traits, including an erect growth habit, a low propensity to shatter, flowers and fruits borne at the end of branches and moderate to large seeds (5 and 38 mg, respectively). The species for which sufficient information was available that were considered highest priority for further investigation were Glycine canescens, Cullen tenax, Swainsona canescens, Swainsona colutoides, Trigonella suavissima, Kennedia prorepens, Glycyrrhiza acanthocarpa, Crotalaria cunninghamii and Rhynchosia minima.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010
Figure 0

Figure 1. Agro-climatic regions of Australia (adapted from29). The target climatic regions include the arid and semi-arid regions too dry for field crops (i.e., G and E6) and the semi-arid cropping zone where moisture is a major growth limitation and with sufficient capacity for growth in winter–spring (i.e., E4, E3 and E2).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Distribution of a selection of widely distributed Australian native Canavalia (a), four native Crotalaria spp. (b) and Cullen spp. (c, d) mapped against targeted agro-climatic regions; semi-arid cropping zone (E2, E3 and E4)—light gray; and the arid interior (E6 and G)—dark gray (see Fig. 1). Data sourced from Australian Virtual Herbarium28.

Figure 2

Table 1. Seed size of Australian native herbaceous legumes. Means in brackets, where a range of material has been measured.

Figure 3

Table 2. Chemical composition of seeds of some native Australian legumes16. Seeds were obtained from a commercial native seed service and had presumably been collected from the wild.

Figure 4

Table 3. Prioritization of species for further investigation as grain legume crops. Species with little information are not included (?—indicates where information is unknown).

Figure 5

Figure 3. Distribution of Australian native Desmodium spp. (a) and Glycine spp. (b, c) mapped against targeted agro-climatic regions; semi-arid cropping zone (E2, E3 and E4)—light gray; and the arid interior (E6 and G)—dark gray (see Fig. 1). Data sourced from Australian Virtual Herbarium28.

Figure 6

Figure 4. Australian distribution of native Rhyncosia, Glycyrrhiza and Hardenbergia spp. (a), Indigofera spp. (b) and Kennedia spp. (c) mapped against targeted agro-climatic regions; semi-arid cropping zone (E2, E3 and E4)—light gray; and the arid interior (E6 and G)—dark gray (see Fig. 1). Data sourced from Australian Virtual Herbarium28.

Figure 7

Figure 5. Distribution of Australian native Lotus and Trigonella spp. (a), a selection of widely distributed Swainsona spp. (b) and native Vigna spp. (c) mapped against targeted agro-climatic regions; semi-arid cropping zone (E2, E3 and E4)—light gray; and the arid interior (E6 and G)—dark gray (see Fig. 1). Data sourced from Australian Virtual Herbarium28.