Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T08:52:36.056Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Appropriateness of antibiotic use in patients with and without altered mental status diagnosed with a urinary tract infection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2022

Connor M. Anderson
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, Kentucky
Jeremy D. VanHoose
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, Kentucky
Donna R. Burgess
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, KentuckyUniversity of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, Kentucky
David S. Burgess
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, Kentucky
Aric Schadler
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, KentuckyUniversity of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky
J. Zachary Porterfield
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, KentuckyUniversity of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky
Katie L. Wallace*
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, KentuckyUniversity of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, Kentucky
*
Author for correspondence: Katie L. Wallace, PharmD, BCPS (AQ-ID), 800 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536. E-mail: katie.wallace@uky.edu

Abstract

Objective:

The objective of this study was to determine antibiotic appropriateness based on Loeb minimum criteria (LMC) in patients with and without altered mental status (AMS).

Design:

Retrospective, quasi-experimental study assessing pooled data from 3 periods pertaining to the implementation of a UTI management guideline.

Setting:

Academic medical center in Lexington, Kentucky.

Patients:

Adult patients aged ≥18 years with a collected urinalysis receiving antimicrobial therapy for a UTI indication.

Methods:

Appropriateness of UTI management was assessed in patients prior to an institutional UTI guideline, after guideline introduction and education, and after implementation of a prospective audit-and-feedback stewardship intervention from September to November 2017–2019. Patient data were pooled and compared between patients noted to have AMS versus those with classic UTI symptoms. Loeb minimum criteria were used to determine whether UTI diagnosis and treatment was warranted.

Results:

In total, 600 patients were included in the study. AMS was one of the most common indications for testing across the 3 periods (19%–30.5%). Among those with AMS, 25 patients (16.7%) met LMC, significantly less than the 151 points (33.6%) without AMS (P < .001).

Conclusions:

Patients with AMS are prescribed antibiotic therapy without symptoms indicative of UTI at a higher rate than those without AMS, according to LMC. Further antimicrobial stewardship efforts should focus on prescriber education and development of clearly defined criteria for patients with and without AMS.

Information

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America
Figure 0

Table 1.Loeb Minimum Criteria4

Figure 1

Table 2.DASON Antibiotic Classification

Figure 2

Table 3.Baseline Characteristics

Figure 3

Table 4.Primary and Secondary Outcomes

Figure 4

Table 5.Patients Qualifying for Loeb Minimum Criteria by Criteria Met