Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T10:27:03.203Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microstructure dependent fatigue crack growth characteristics in the Ni–17Mo–7Cr base superalloy before and after thermal exposure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2016

Yanming He*
Affiliation:
Institute of Process Equipment and Control Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, People's Republic of China
Jianguo Yang*
Affiliation:
Institute of Process Equipment and Control Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, People's Republic of China
Sanlong Zheng
Affiliation:
Institute of Process Equipment and Control Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, People's Republic of China
*
a) Address all correspondence to these authors. e-mail: heyanming@zjut.edu.cn

Abstract

The fatigue crack growth (FCG) tests were performed on a Ni–17Mo–7Cr base superalloy before and after thermal exposure to investigate the influence of microstructural variation on the alloy's FCG behavior. It was observed that the original alloy consists of Ni matrix and MoC particles. When the alloy was aged at 1350 °C for 0.5 h, the MoC melts together with circumambient Ni matrix, forming a eutectic–like structure. The microstructural analysis shows that, for original alloy, the crack basically propagates in the matrix. When it encounters the particles, the crack meanders to avoid them, creating a linear da/dN–ΔK curve. As the crack approaches the eutectic-like structures within the aged alloy, however, it cuts through them but circumvents tiny particles within the structures, producing torturous crack paths and waved da/dN–ΔK curve. The aged alloy has a higher FCG resistance in contrast to original alloy.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 
Figure 0

TABLE I. Composition of Ni–17Mo–7Cr base superalloy used in the experiments.

Figure 1

FIG. 1. Samples geometry of FCG tests (in mm).

Figure 2

FIG. 2. (a) SE and (b) BSE images of original Ni–17Mo–7Cr alloy.

Figure 3

FIG. 3. SEM images of Ni–17Mo–7Cr alloy after thermal exposure: (a) SE image of the alloy, (b) SE image of eutectic–like structure, (c) magnified SE image of the eutectic–like structure, and (d) BSE image of the eutectic–like structure.

Figure 4

FIG. 4. Bright–field TEM micrographs of the aged alloy: (a) TEM micrograph of Ni and MoC, (b) TEM micrograph of the Ni, (c) TEM micrograph of the MoC, (d) HRTEM result of (b), and (e) HRTEM result of (c).

Figure 5

FIG. 5. FCG behavior of the Ni–17Mo–7Cr alloy under stress ratios of 0.3 and 0.5.

Figure 6

FIG. 6. A typical example of FCG paths in the Paris regime obtained for the Ni–17Mo–7Cr alloy under stress ratio of 0.3: (a–c) SEM micrographs showing the crack deflection when it encounters the particles, and (d) large–angle crack deflection.

Figure 7

FIG. 7. SEM image showing the typical FCG paths, the slip bands appear coupled with the penetrating crack.

Figure 8

FIG. 8. Crack length as a function of fatigue cycles in the alloy before and after thermal exposure.

Figure 9

FIG. 9. FCG behavior of the aged Ni–17Mo–7Cr alloy under two stress ratios of 0.1 and 0.3.

Figure 10

FIG. 10. In–situ observation of the crack growth paths under different fatigue cycles. (a) 188939 cycles and (b) 221162 cycles.

Figure 11

FIG. 11. Typical FCG paths in the Paris regime obtained for the aged Ni–17Mo–7Cr alloy under stress ratios of 0.3: (a–c) SEM images showing the crack cutting through the eutectic–like structures, and (d) large–angle crack deflection.

Figure 12

FIG. 12. Morphologies of fatigue fracture surface obtained for the Ni–17Mo–7Cr alloy before and after thermal exposure: (a) in near threshold region (before thermal exposure), (b) in Paris regime, (c) in the near threshold region (after thermal exposure), and (d) in the Paris regime.

Figure 13

FIG. 13. Observed plastic zones along the crack paths in the alloy before and after thermal exposure: (a) original alloy, (b–c) aged alloy, and (d) magnified image of white rectangle in (c).

Figure 14

FIG. 14. Secondary cracks in the aged alloy: (a–c) SEM images showing the crack branching when it cuts through the eutectic–like structures, and (d) secondary cracks near the large–angle crack deflection.

Figure 15

FIG. 15. Schematic illustrations of crack growth paths in the Ni–17Mo–7Cr alloy (a) before and (b) after thermal exposure.