Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-zsp5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T12:51:32.481Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measuring snow in 3-D using X-ray tomography: assessment of visualization techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2017

M. Heggli
Affiliation:
WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Flüelastrasse 11, CH-7260 Davos-Dorf, Switzerland E-mail: schneebeli@slf.ch
B. Köchle
Affiliation:
WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Flüelastrasse 11, CH-7260 Davos-Dorf, Switzerland E-mail: schneebeli@slf.ch
M. Matzl
Affiliation:
WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Flüelastrasse 11, CH-7260 Davos-Dorf, Switzerland E-mail: schneebeli@slf.ch
B.R. Pinzer
Affiliation:
WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Flüelastrasse 11, CH-7260 Davos-Dorf, Switzerland E-mail: schneebeli@slf.ch
F. Riche
Affiliation:
WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Flüelastrasse 11, CH-7260 Davos-Dorf, Switzerland E-mail: schneebeli@slf.ch
S. Steiner
Affiliation:
WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Flüelastrasse 11, CH-7260 Davos-Dorf, Switzerland E-mail: schneebeli@slf.ch
D. Steinfeld
Affiliation:
WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Flüelastrasse 11, CH-7260 Davos-Dorf, Switzerland E-mail: schneebeli@slf.ch
M. Schneebeli
Affiliation:
WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Flüelastrasse 11, CH-7260 Davos-Dorf, Switzerland E-mail: schneebeli@slf.ch
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstarct

Snow hides its true structure from easy visual observation. One reason is that ice is transparent, so the three-dimensional (3-D) structure is impossible to disentangle. 3-D reconstruction is essential to understand the physical and mechanical properties of snow. In recent years, the techniques to measure and visualize snow in 3-D have improved tremendously. X-ray microtomography is much more user-friendly than the older microtome sectioning techniques. We show different techniques to measure cast and natural snow samples and the steps necessary to produce high-quality data. The simplest way is 3-D renderings. Imaging snow in 3-D definitively challenges our previous view of a snowpack consisting of particles as traditionally seen on a crystal card.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © the Author(s) [year] 2011
Figure 0

Fig. 1.Typical snow types presented as snow grains (left) and as surface renderings (right) (volume size 3.6 ×3.6 ×3.6 mm3; voxel size 18×18×18 μm3). The traditional grain images do not contain any information about the 3-D structure and the pores (scales in mm) (color anaglyphs at http://tinyurl.com/snow-visualization).

Figure 1

Fig. 2.Two images separated by 2 days from a time-lapse movie. The snow was under a constant temperature gradient of ~50 Km–1. The image at time 577 hours compared to time 625 hours shows where water vapor was deposited as ice, and where ice sublimated. The reference frame was constant; the crystals grow downwards, towards the vapor source.

Figure 2

Fig. 3.Physical 3-D model of snow microstructure (large rounded grains, RGlg) can be used for exhibitions and teaching (size 10×10×10 cm3, 25× magnification). The model was produced based on micro-CT data by laser sintering.

Figure 3

Fig. 4.Fragile layered snow samples can be visualized using the replica method. The bonding between different layers in a snowpack is visible. This sample shows the top 66mm of a snowpack from Davos including a melt crust (sample size 5× 5×66 mm3; voxel size 10×10×10 μm3).

Figure 4

Fig. 5.Layer of subsurface hoar in the snowpack (Totalp, Davos, Switzerland, 14 January 2010, volume 3×3×25 mm; voxel size 10×10×10 μm). The anaglyph image is online at http://tinyurl.com/6ye9z73.