Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-th4rj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T04:43:34.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Risk-Benefit Considerations of Mitigation Measures on Acrylamide Content of Foods – A Case Study on Potatoes, Cereals and Coffee

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2008

C. J. Seal*
Affiliation:
1.Newcastle University, School of Agriculture, Food & Rural Development, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
A. de Mul
Affiliation:
2.RIKILT- Institute of Food Safety - Wageningen UR, P.O. Box 230, NL-6700 AE Wageningen, The Netherlands
G. Eisenbrand
Affiliation:
3.University of Kaiserslautern, Department of Chemistry, Division of Food Chemistry and Toxicology, P.O. Box 3049, DE-67653 Kaiserslautern, Germany
A. J. Haverkort
Affiliation:
4.Plant Research International, Postbus 16, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
K. Franke
Affiliation:
5.German Institute of Food Technology (DIL e.V.), Professor-von-Klitzing-Straße 7, DE-49610 Quakenbrück, Germany
S. P. D. Lalljie
Affiliation:
6.Unilever, Colworth House, Sharnbrook MK44 1LQ, Bedfordshire, UK
H. Mykkänen
Affiliation:
7.University of Kuopio, Department of Clinical Nutrition, P.O. Box 1627, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland
E. Reimerdes
Affiliation:
5.German Institute of Food Technology (DIL e.V.), Professor-von-Klitzing-Straße 7, DE-49610 Quakenbrück, Germany
G. Scholz
Affiliation:
8.Nestlé Research Centre, P.O. Box 44, Vers-Chez-les-Blanc, CH-1000 Lausanne 26, Switzerland
V. Somoza
Affiliation:
9.German Research Centre for Food Chemistry, Lichtenbergstrasse, 4, DE-85748 Garching, Germany
S. Tuijtelaars
Affiliation:
10. ILSI Europe a.i.s.b.l., Avenue E. Mounier 83, Box 6, BE-1200 Brussels, Belgium
M. van Boekel
Affiliation:
11. Wageningen University, Department of Agrotechnology & Food Sciences, P.O. Box 8129, NL-6700 EV Wageningen, The Netherlands
J. van Klaveren
Affiliation:
2.RIKILT- Institute of Food Safety - Wageningen UR, P.O. Box 230, NL-6700 AE Wageningen, The Netherlands
S. J. Wilcockson
Affiliation:
1.Newcastle University, School of Agriculture, Food & Rural Development, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
L. Wilms
Affiliation:
12. DSM, P.O. Box 1, NL-2600 MA Delft, The Netherlands
*
*ILSI Europe a.i.s.b.l. - Avenue E. Mounier 83, Box 6 - B-1200 Brussels - Belgium publications@ilsieurope.be - Fax : +32 2 762 00 44
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
© The Authors 2008
Figure 0

Table 1Overview of chemical reactions in relation to quality of foods

Figure 1

Fig. 1Highly schematic representation of the effect of time and temperature on heat-induced reactions. The time is expressed as the time needed to achieve some effect (e.g. 90 % inactivation of an enzyme, or 1 % loss of a vitamin).

Figure 2

Fig. 2Schematic representation of reducing sugar concentration in potato tubers showing that high initial (pre-tuber maturity) reducing sugar levels lead to far higher levels at cold storage. The thin broken line represents tubers attached to the plant under ambient temperatures and the thick broken line represents post-harvest tubers stored at 9°C. Solid lines represent harvested immature (thin line) and mature (thick line) tubers stored at 4°C leading to cold sweetening. Dotted lines represent reconditioning at 18°C. Variety, levels of nutrients, weather and soil moisture determine tuber sugar levels during tuber growth and at harvest.

Figure 3

Table 2Chemical composition of rye flour, whole wheat flour and potato flake, μmol/kg(40)

Figure 4

Fig. 3Correlation of asparagine level (mg/kg) with protein content for wheat grown over a range of nitrogen fertiliser regimes(41).

Figure 5

Table 3List of potato products* and mitigation measures, which have been tested in labscale or pilotscale experiments

Figure 6

Table 4List of cereal products* and mitigation measures, which have been tested in labscale or pilotscale experiments

Figure 7

Table 5Acrylamide content of cereal products, possible reduction, mitigation measure used and sustainability of product quality

Figure 8

Table 6Exposure contribution of coffee to overall acrylamide exposure in various countries

Figure 9

Table 7Variability in acrylamide concentration (μg/kg) in roast and ground coffee

Figure 10

Table 8Loss of acrylamide during storage of coffee

Figure 11

Table 9Diseases for which the consumption of coffee is associated with a significant risk reduction

Figure 12

Table 10Food groups with average acrylamide levels

Figure 13

Table 11Exposure to acrylamide for different mitigation scenarios, based on labscale experiments

Figure 14

Fig. 4Acrylamide exposure for different mitigation measures relative to the original exposure for the P50 exposure.

Figure 15

Fig. 5Exposure expressed as MOE for the original scenario and the mitigation scenarios.

Figure 16

Table 12Acrylamide reduction after lab-scale experiments with coincidental side effects

Figure 17

Table 13Mean acrylamide and sodium exposure before and after substitution of ammonium bicarbonate with sodium bicarbonate as a theoretical mitigation scenario

Figure 18

Fig. 6Simultaneous exposure to acrylamide and sodium in (a) original scenario and (b) after usage of sodium as a baking agent in cookies.

Figure 19

Table 14Percentage of consumers in different exposure classes for sodium and acrylamide before and after mitigation

Figure 20

Table 15Ranking orders of products contributing to acrylamide and sodium exposures before and after mitigation