Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T20:58:56.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Survey and clinical implications on the isolation of mycobacteria in the waterline of dental units

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2026

Koko Shibutani
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, St. Luke’s International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
Chie Masuda
Affiliation:
St. Luke’s International Hospital
Sayaka Fujisaki
Affiliation:
Dentistry and Oral Surgery
Yasuhiro Ozawa
Affiliation:
Dentistry & Oral Surgery
Kazunori Hattori
Affiliation:
St. Luke’s International Hospital

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Background: Mycobacteria are widely distributed in the environment, and colonization of medical devices using water poses a risk in healthcare settings. Hospital outbreaks linked to ventilators and extracorporeal systems have been reported. At our hospital, dental unit water is routinely cultured every three months. In January 2024, unexpected mycobacterial detection prompted an investigation of dental unit waterlines, tanks, and water sources. Objective: To investigate the presence of mycobacteria in dental unit waterlines and evaluate clinical implications. Methods: Water samples (300ml) from six dental unit waterlines were tested by culture before and after changes in flushing frequency, heater use, and filter replacement. Additional samples from the hospital annex water tanks, main building tank, and nearby parks sharing the same water source were analyzed. Results: Mycobacteria were isolated from all six dental unit waterlines, including M. frederiksbergense, M. chelonae complex, M. mageritense, and M. mucogenicum/phocaicum, with concentrations up to 25 CFU/mL. Increasing flushing from weekly to daily and discontinuing heater use did not eliminate contamination. However, quantitative cultures after filter replacement showed marked reduction, with most lines becoming negative or <0.5 CFU/mL. Mycobacteria were also detected in external water sources: annex water tank (10 CFU/mL), main building tank (<2.5 CFU/mL), and nearby parks (<5 CFU/mL). These findings suggest mycobacteria are not unique to dental units but are ubiquitously present in tap water. Discussion: Detection in both dental units and external water sources indicates widespread colonization rather than isolated contamination. Filtration proved effective in significantly reducing mycobacterial load, emphasizing its role in infection control. Given the pathogenic potential of environmental mycobacteria, especially in immunocompromised patients such as those with neutropenia or hematopoietic cell transplantation, exposure via dental unit water may carry clinical risks. For these patients, use of sterile water instead of tap water during dental treatment is strongly considered. Conclusion: Mycobacteria are present in tap water and dental unit waterlines. Filter replacement effectively reduces contamination. Strict precautions, including sterile water use, are warranted to protect vulnerable patients from opportunistic mycobacterial infections.

Information

Type
Environmental Cleaning
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America