Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T15:16:20.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison and selection of vegetation indices for detection of Sclerotinia Stem Rot on oilseed rape leaves using ground-based hyperspectral imaging

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2017

C. Zhang
Affiliation:
College of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, Hang Zhou, 310058, China
F. Liu
Affiliation:
College of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, Hang Zhou, 310058, China
X. P. Feng
Affiliation:
College of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, Hang Zhou, 310058, China
Y. He*
Affiliation:
College of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, Hang Zhou, 310058, China
Y. D. Bao
Affiliation:
College of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, Hang Zhou, 310058, China
L. W. He
Affiliation:
College of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, Hang Zhou, 310058, China
*
† E-mail: yhe@zju.edu.cn

Abstract

A ground-based hyperspectral imaging system covering the spectral range of 384–1034 nm was used for Sclerotinia Stem Rot (SSR) detection. Two sample sets of oilseed leaves were collected. Four vegetation indices were extracted and evaluated by analysis of variance (ANOVA) combined with linear discriminant analysis (LDA) for the two sample sets. Discriminant models were built using the 4 vegetation indices. The discriminant results of the two sample sets were good with classification accuracies of the calibration set and the prediction set over 85%. The overall results indicated that vegetation indices calculated from ground-based hyperspectral imaging could be used as reliable and accurate indices for SSR detection.

Figure 0

Table 1 Results of correlation analysis and ANOVA using vegetation indices of healthy and infected oilseed rape leaves

Figure 1

Table 2 LDA models using individual vegetation index

Figure 2

Table 3 Results of discriminant models using combined vegetation indices