Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T13:42:35.460Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Paleoproterozoic evolution of the Guiana Shield in Suriname: A revised model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2016

S.B. Kroonenberg*
Affiliation:
Delft University of Technology, Department of Geoscience and Engineering, P.O. Box 5048, 2600 GA Delft, the Netherlands
E.W.F. de Roever
Affiliation:
VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, De Boelelaan 1085–1087, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands
L.M. Fraga
Affiliation:
CPRM – Serviço Geológico do Brasil, Departamento de Geologia – DEGEO/ERJ, Avenida Pasteur, 404 – Urca, 22290-240 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
N.J. Reis
Affiliation:
CPRM – Serviço Geológico do Brasil, Av. André Araújo 2160 – Aleixo, Manaus, AM, Brazil
T. Faraco
Affiliation:
CPRM – Serviço Geológico do Brasil, Avenida Dr. Freitas, 3645 – Bairro do Marco, Belém, PA, Brazil
J.-M. Lafon
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Pará, Instituto de Geociências, Campus Universitário do Guamá, Rua Augusto Correa Nº01, Belém, PA, Brazil
U. Cordani
Affiliation:
Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Geociências, Rua do Lago 562, Cidade Universitaria, CEP 05508-080, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
T.E. Wong
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Suriname, Faculteit Technische Wetenschappen, Leysweg 86, P.O. Box 9212, Paramaribo, Suriname
*
*Corresponding author. Email: s.b.kroonenberg@tudelft.nl

Abstract

The Proterozoic basement of Suriname consists of a greenstone–tonalite–trondhjemite–granodiorite belt in the northeast of the country, two high-grade belts in the northwest and southwest, respectively, and a large granitoid–felsic volcanic terrain in the central part of the country, punctuated by numerous gabbroic intrusions. The basement is overlain by the subhorizontal Proterozoic Roraima sandstone formation and transected by two Proterozoic and one Jurassic dolerite dyke swarms. Late Proterozoic mylonitisation affected large parts of the basement. Almost 50 new U–Pb and Pb–Pb zircon ages and geochemical data have been obtained in Suriname, and much new data are also available from the neighbouring countries. This has led to a considerable revision of the geological evolution of the basement. The main orogenic event is the Trans-Amazonian Orogeny, resulting from southwards subduction and later collision between the Guiana Shield and the West African Craton. The first phase, between 2.18 and 2.09 Ga, shows ocean floor magmatism, volcanic arc development, sedimentation, metamorphism, anatexis and plutonism in the Marowijne Greenstone Belt and the adjacent older granites and gneisses. The second phase encompasses the evolution of the Bakhuis Granulite Belt and Coeroeni Gneiss Belt through rift-type basin formation, volcanism, sedimentation and, between 2.07 and 2.05 Ga, high-grade metamorphism. The third phase, between 1.99 and 1.95 Ga, is characterised by renewed high-grade metamorphism in the Bakhuis and Coeroeni belts along an anticlockwise cooling path, and ignimbritic volcanism and extensive and varied intrusive magmatism in the western half of the country. An alternative scenario is also discussed, implying an origin of the Coeroeni Gneiss Belt as an active continental margin, recording northwards subduction and finally collision between a magmatic arc in the south and an older northern continent. The Grenvillian collision between Laurentia and Amazonia around 1.2–1.0 Ga caused widespread mylonitisation and mica age resetting in the basement.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Netherlands Journal of Geosciences Foundation 2016 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. The Guiana Shield and the Central Brazilian Shield together form the Amazonian Craton (modified after Cordani & Sato, 1999).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Simplified geological map of the Guiana Shield, compiled after various sources.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Simplified geological map of Suriname, according to modern data.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Locations of new radiometrically dated samples (numbers refer to Tables 2–5).

Figure 4

Table 1. Stratigraphy and sequence of events in the suriname basement

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Pillow structures in Paramaka metabasalts from Poederberg, Stonbroekoe Mountains.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Armina Formation metaturbidite sequence at the type locality, Marowijne River.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Cross-bedded Rosebel meta-arenite, with magnetite concentrated at the base of the foresets. Royal Hill pit, Rosebel Gold Mine.

Figure 8

Fig. 8. Rosebel Formation meta-arenite with phyllite and quartz pebbles (left: parallel to bedding, right: perpendicular to bedding). Royal Hill pit, Rosebel Gold Mine.

Figure 9

Fig. 9. Intensely folded migmatitic Sara's Lust Gneiss at type locality. Black arrow indicates calcsilicate nodule with carbonate core.

Figure 10

Table 2. Geochronology of Older granites from central Suriname (for sample location see Fig. 4).

Figure 11

Fig. 10. Synkinematic metadolerite dyke in banded granulite, from De Roever et al., 2003a.

Figure 12

Table 3. Geochronological data Bakhuis Granulite Belt (for location samples see Fig. 4).

Figure 13

Fig. 11. Isoclinally folded migmatitic biotite-muscovite gneiss, Coeroeni River.

Figure 14

Table 4. U–Pb geochronology of Coeroeni Gneiss Belt rocks (for location samples see Fig. 4).

Figure 15

Fig. 12. U–Pb SHRIMP ages of zircon cores (2053 Ma) and rims (1986 Ma) of sample KG 826, cordierite–muscovite–biotite gneiss, in which cordierite is partly replaced by ferrogedrite, andalusite, sillimanite, staurolite and garnet. Lucie River, sample number 24, 25 in Fig. 4 and Table 4.

Figure 16

Table 5. U–Pb and Pb–Pb geochronology of felsic metavolcanics and Younger Intrusives (for sample location see Fig. 4).

Figure 17

Fig. 13. Fiamme (collapsed pumice fragments) in felsic metavolcanics, Sipaliwini River. Scale in centimetres.

Figure 18

Fig. 14. Paleosol near base of Tafelberg Formation, Elfriedeval, Tafelberg. Core diameter 4 cm.

Figure 19

Fig. 15. Sketch map of the correlation of the eastern half of the Guiana Shield with the West African Craton. Modified after Cordani & Teixeira (2007), adapted from Nomade et al. (2003).