Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T05:26:20.100Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Araucariaceous fossil woods from the Upper Triassic Ischigualasto Formation (San Juan Province, Argentina): paleofloristic and paleoclimatic implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2022

Josefina Bodnar*
Affiliation:
División Paleobotánica, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Paseo del Bosque s/n, B1900FWA La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina
Ana Julia Sagasti
Affiliation:
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), ArgentinaInstituto de Recursos Minerales (INREMI-UNLP-CIC), Calle 64 3, B1904AMC La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Gustavo A. Correa
Affiliation:
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), ArgentinaInstituto y Museo de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de San Juan, CIGEOBIO, CONICET, Av. España 400 (norte), J5400DNQ San Juan, San Juan, Argentina.
Victoria Miranda
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Av. 122 y 60, 1900 La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Florencia Medina
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Av. 122 y 60, 1900 La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

In this contribution, fossil woods from the Valle de La Luna Member of the Upper Triassic Ischigualasto Formation at Ischigualasto Provincial Park, San Juan Province, Argentina, are described. The specimens are preserved as silica permineralization in tuffs intercalated with carbonaceous mudstone beds interpreted as distal floodplain facies. The fossil woods were assigned to the new species Agathoxylon argentinum since their anatomy differs from the known Mesozoic Gondwanan species of the genus Agathoxylon. The combination of characters present in the new taxon indicates an affiliation with the conifer family Araucariaceae. Signals of fungal-mediated wood decay were observed, comparable to the activity of basidiomycetes. Spherical structures attached to the walls of the tracheids were recognized and are interpreted as holocarpic chytrid fungi. The growth rings were quantitatively analyzed. Low values of percentage diminution, percentage latewood, and Ring Markedness Index, and a mean percentage skew of +11.5, were obtained, suggesting that the new species was an evergreen gymnosperm. The stratigraphic distribution and taxonomic composition of the Ischigualasto Formation fossil-plant-bearing levels were studied. A vegetation change is recorded in the fossil level bearing Agathoxylon argentinum n. sp., marked by the replacement of the corystosperm genera and a diminution of arboreal corystosperms. This floristic change, in addition to other evidence, indicates humid paleoclimatic conditions for the uppermost part of the Valle de La Luna Member of the Ischigualasto Formation.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Paleontological Society
Figure 0

Figure 1.(1) Geographic location of the San Juan Province, at South America and Argentina. (2) Geographic location of the Ischigualasto-Villa Unión Basin at San Juan Province. (3) Geological map of the Ischigualasto-Villa Unión Basin, with the location of the studied area at the Ischigualasto Provincial Park. (4) Outcrops of the Ischigualasto Provincial Park showing the localities with PFLs (1–8). Modified from Colombi et al. (2021). Satellite image taken from Google Earth.

Figure 1

Figure 2.(1) General sedimentological section of the Ischigualasto Formation. (2) Detailed sedimentological section of the Valle de La Luna Member showing the stratigraphic position of the PFLs. Modified from Currie et al. (2009).

Figure 2

Table 1.Megafossil plant content of the eight PFLs recognized in the Ischigualasto Formation at the Ischigualasto Provincial Park, San Juan Argentina. Information taken from Frenguelli (1948) Archangelsky (1968), Brett (1968), Zamuner (1992), and Zamuner et al. (2001). *The informal name of each plant group precedes the formal names of orders and families in brackets.

Figure 3

Figure 3.Agathoxylon argentinum n. sp. (1, 2) General view of the silicified wood, paratype LPPB 495. (3, 4) Surface view of growth rings in transverse section; (3) paratype LPPB 495; (4) holotype LPPB 492. (5, 6) Tracheids in transverse section showing the form of silicification; (5) under plane polarized light; (6) under crossed nicol, paratype LPpm 1375. (7, 8) Transverse section of the secondary xylem showing a crack filled with amorphous silica and microcrystalline quartz; (7) under plane polarized light; (8) under crossed nicol, holotype LPpm 1367. (1, 2) Scale bars = 20 mm; (3) scale bar = 2 mm; (4) scale bar = 5 mm; (5, 6) scale bars = 100 μm; (7, 8) scale bars = 500 μm.

Figure 4

Figure 4.Agathoxylon argentinum n. sp. (1) General view of the transverse section of the secondary xylem, holotype LPpm 1367. (2) Detail of the growth-ring boundary in transverse section, holotype LPpm 1367. (3) Detail of transverse section of tracheids, paratype LPpm 1375. (4, 5) Tracheid radial pitting, with uniseriate to triseriate, contiguous to compressed and alternating pattern; (4) holotype LPpm 1370; (5) paratype LPpm 1376. (6) Detail of the tracheid radial pitting and the resin plate in a tracheid (arrow), holotype LPpm 1180. (7) Detail of tracheids with truncate terminal walls, holotype LPpm 1181. (8) General view of radial section of the secondary xylem, paratype LPpm 1376. (1) Scale bar = 650 μm; (2) scale bar = 250 μm; (3–5) scale bars = 120 μm; (6) scale bar = 60 μm; (7) scale bar = 70 μm; (8) scale bar = 200 μm.

Figure 5

Figure 5.Agathoxylon argentinum n. sp. (1) General view of the radial section of the secondary xylem showing the ray parenchyma cell types, the cross fields, and resin contents in ray cells, holotype LPpm 1370. (2, 3) Detail of araucarioid cross-field pitting; (2) paratype LPpm 1376; (3) holotype LPpm 1370. (4) General view of tangential section showing the mainly uniseriate rays and occasional biseriate in part rays, paratype LPpm 1377. (5, 6) Detail of rays and tracheid with spiral fissures and resin plates (arrows), holotype LPpm 1372. (7) Leaf trace in tangential section, holotype LPpm 1182. (8) Detail of leaf trace; arrows indicate tracheids. (9) Leaf trace in transverse section; arrows indicate tracheids, LPpm 1380. (1) Scale bar = 100 μm; (2) scale bar = 60 μm; (3) scale bar = 50 μm; (4) scale bar = 450 μm; (5, 6, 8, 9) scale bars = 250 μm; (7) scale bar = 350 μm.

Figure 6

Figure 6.Agathoxylon argentinum n. sp., scanning electron microscope images LPPB 492. (1) General view of the tracheid radial pitting. (2) Detail of biseriate, compressed, and alternating tracheids pits. (3) Detail of uniseriate, compressed, and alternating tracheids pits. (4) Detail of a cross field. (5) Detail of a uniseriate ray in tangential section. (6) Spiral fissures in tracheid tangential walls. (1, 5, 6) Scale bars = 50 μm; (2) scale bar = 60 μm; (3) scale bar = 40 μm; (4) scale bar = 30 μm.

Figure 7

Table 2.Comparison among main Mesozoic Agathoxylon species recorded in Gondwana. SGD = stratigraphic and geographic distribution; GR = growth rings; TEL = transition from earlywood to latewood; TS = tracheid section; TTD = tangential diameter of earlywood tracheids (mean value or range when the mean value was not provided); TRPSE = seriation of tracheid radial pitting; TRPA = arrangement of (two or more seriate) tracheid pitting in radial walls; TRPSP = spacing of tracheid radial pitting; TRPD = diameter of tracheid radial pits (mean values or range when the mean value was not provided); TTP = tracheid tangential pitting; TRP = tracheids with resin plates or plugs; ST = septate tracheids; AP = axial parenchyma; RW = ray width; RH = ray height; CP = type of individual cross-field pits; CA = arrangement of cross-field pits; CPN = cross-field pit number; CPD = cross-field pit diameter (mean values or range when the mean value was not provided). Between () characters which appear less frequently. *Information not provided in the species protologue and taken from a subsequent contribution. 1We used the combination Agathoxylon antarticum (Poole and Cantrill, 2001) Pujana et al., 2014, but we follow the original diagnosis of the basionym provided by Poole and Cantrill (2001). 2 The presence of resin plates is not mentioned in the diagnosis or in the description of Poole and Cantrill (2001), but some probable resin plates are observed in the photos (Poole and Cantrill, 2001, pl. 1, fig, 8). 3Agathoxylon dallonni was previously cited in the Upper Triassic of Argentina by Crisafulli and Herbst (2010), but the specimens were reassigned to Agathoxylon lamaibandianus by Gnaedinger and Zavattieri (2020). 4In the original diagnosis of Boureau (1948), the cross-field pits are described as simple and in the photos seems to be bordered (Boureau, 1948, pl. 1, fig. 5). 5Although Pujana et al. (2014) proposed that Agathoxylon matildense is a junior synonym of Agathoxylon antarticum, we considered that the protologues of both species show enough differences to segregate them (i.e., tracheid section, the ray height, and the number of pits per cross field, see Poole and Cantrill, 2001, p. 1086, pl. 1, 2–10; Zamuner and Falaschi, 2005, p. 340, fig. 2).

Figure 8

Figure 7.Structures related to the degradation of wood by fungi recognized in Agathoxylon argentinum n. sp. (1, 2) Transverse section showing resinous contents in the ray cells and tracheid walls with differential degradation of cellulose and hemicellulose and detached and strongly thickened S3 layer, LPpm 1380. (3) Collapsed tracheids in transverse section with detached S3 layer folded toward the lumen, LPpm 1380. (4) Complete degradation of the cell wall with small groups of spherical structures adhered to the cell wall (white arrow), LPpm 1380. (5) Tracheid walls with detached and strongly thickened S3 layer; white arrow indicates isolated spherical structures, LPpm 1379. (6) Isolated spherical structure adhered to a ray parenchyma cell; white arrow indicates a probable process for anchoring, LPpm 1379. (1) Scale bar = 70 μm; (2) scale bar = 50 μm; (3, 4) scale bars = 80 μm; (5) scale bar = 50 μm; (6) scale bar = 30 μm.

Figure 9

Figure 8.(1–10) Mean radial cell diameter (μm) curves (a and orange line) and CSDM curves (b and blue line) in Agathoxylon argentinum n. sp. from the measured ring increments 1 to 10. Vertical dotted gray line shows the zenith of each CSDM curve.

Figure 10

Table 3.Results of growth-ring analysis in Agathoxylon argentinum n. sp. using the Falcon-Lang (2000a, b) method.

Figure 11

Table 4.Comparison among Agathoxylon argentinum n. sp. and the wood of extant Araucariaceae. GD = stratigraphic and geographic distribution; GR = growth rings; TEL = transition from earlywood to latewood; TS = tracheid section; TTD = tangential diameter of earlywood tracheids (mean values); TRPSE = seriation of tracheid radial pitting; TRPA = arrangement of (two or more seriate) tracheid pitting in radial walls; TRPSP = spacing of tracheid radial pitting; TRPD = diameter of tracheid radial pits (mean values); TTP = tracheid tangential pitting; TRP = tracheids with resin plates or plugs; ST = septate tracheids; AP = axial parenchyma; RW = ray width; RH = ray height; CP = type of individual cross–field pits; CA = arrangement of cross–field pits; CPN = cross–field pit number; CPD = cross–field pit diameter (mean values). *Measurements from the photo provided by Heady et al. (2002; fig. 13). Characters that appear occasionally are in parentheses. Information taken from Greguss (1955), García Esteban et al. (2002, 2004), Heady et al. (2002), IAWA Committee (2004), Farjon (2010), http://insidewood.lib.ncsu.edu/search (2004 onward), https://www.gbif.org, and this work.

Figure 12

Table 5.Comparison of growth-ring parameters of Agathoxylon argentinum n. sp. with other Triassic species from Argentina (*) and selected extant conifer species. Mean values in parentheses. Information taken from Falcon-Lang (2000a, 2000b), Artabe et al. (2007), Bodnar and Artabe (2007), and Brea et al. (2008).