Introduction
Premature atrial complexes are frequent among patients after heart transplantation. Ivabradine is a hyperpolarisation-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channel blocker, which has been shown to decrease heart rate in paediatric and adult heart failure. Reference Bonnet, Berger, Jokinen, Kantor and Daubeney1 In addition, ivabradine is a potent antiarrhythmic agent as it decreases ectopy, and thus may be beneficial in certain types of atrial/junctional tachycardia. Reference Janson, Tan, Iyer, Vogel, Vetter and Shah2 However, successful ivabradine usage for atrial arrhythmia in paediatric cardiac transplant recipients has not been reported to date.
Case report
We herein report a 15-year old patient who exhibited marked palpitations caused by atrial premature complexes (30 % of all QRS complexes) within a few days after orthotopic bicaval heart transplantation for severe dilative cardiomyopathy (associated with limb girdle muscular dystrophy; compound heterozygous mutation in the fukutin-related protein gene, c.826C>A and c.947C>G). The patient received initial amiodarone loading, which decreased premature atrial complex frequency to only 15–20 %. Since ectopy showed sinus node-like appearance in the 12-lead ECG, we administered ivabradine (0,3 mg/kg/d), Reference Oeffl, Schober and Faudon3 which caused immediate reduction in premature atrial complex frequency to <0.05 % (Figure 1). Amiodarone was discontinued after initial loading, and the patient has remained stable for several months on ivabradine with heart rates 80–95/min. Of note, the postoperative course was otherwise uneventful.
(A) ECG (lead II, 25 mm/s) with marked arrhythmia caused by premature atrial complexes. (B) ECG (lead II, 25 mm/s) with normal sinus rhythm in the absence of premature atrial complexes 72 hours after initiation of ivabradine (0.3 mg/kg/d).

Discussion
Ivabradine may be used for heart rate control/heart failure therapy, but it also exhibits anti-arrhythmic properties. Reference Oeffl, Schober and Faudon3 Cardiac graft denervation after heart transplantation causes inadequate sinus tachycardia, which is associated with a reduced survival. Rivinis et al. conducted a registry study analysing 104 adult patients receiving either ivabradine (n = 50) or metoprolol succinate (n = 54) within 5 years after cardiac transplantation. Reference Rivinius, Helmschrott and Rahm4 Compared to baseline and metoprolol succinate, patients with ivabradine had a significantly lower heart rate, reduced left ventricular mass, lower left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, and reduced NT-proBNP level. Moreover, five-year post-transplant survival was significantly better in patients with ivabradine. Reference Rivinius, Helmschrott and Rahm4
Except for a single case report, there are no paediatric data available on the use of ivabradine for heart failure therapy/heart rate control after cardiac transplantation. Recently, Ogawa et al. reported on the use of ivabradine in a 10-year-old patient with graft failure after cardiac transplantation. Reference Ogawa, Urata and Inuzuka5 Bonnet et al. conducted a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study on ivabradine in children with dilated cardiomyopathy and symptomatic chronic heart failure. Of the 116 patients, 70 % reached the primary endpoint of a ≥ 20 % heart rate reduction (p < 0.0001), though response variability highlighted the need for dose titration. Improvements in left ventricular function, clinical status, and quality of life were noted. Reference Bonnet, Berger, Jokinen, Kantor and Daubeney1
Besides its role in heart failure therapy, ivabradine has been investigated as an antiarrhythmic agent in paediatric patients, mainly for tachyarrhythmias driven by increased automaticity. One of the first systematic investigations on paediatric ivabradine usage illustrated its potential to treat junctional ectopic tachycardia after CHD surgery in combination with amiodarone. Reference Dieks, Klehs, Müller, Paul and Krause6 In addition, Janson et al. described four cases, where ivabradine helped control junctional ectopic tachycardia and ectopic atrial tachycardia in three patients, but was ineffective for a post-transplant supraventricular tachycardia, likely due to a microreentry mechanism. Reference Janson, Tan, Iyer, Vogel, Vetter and Shah2 In addition, Krishna et al. examined ivabradine in postoperative junctional ectopic tachycardia in 26 patients, of which 54 % were successfully treated with ivabradine alone, 38 % required combination therapy with amiodarone, and 8 % received ivabradine alongside flecainide. Reference Krishna, Kunde, Kumar and Balaji7 Furthermore, Younis et al. reported ivabradine use in refractory supraventricular tachycardia. Within the treatment-resistant subgroup (3 out of 79 patients), ivabradine was successful in two out of three cases. One patient was treated with ivabradine alone, another received a combination therapy with amiodarone. Reference Younis, Abi-Saleh and Al Amin8 Safety and efficacy of ivabradine for heart failure and/or arrhythmia therapy have also been suggested during infancy by recent case series on ivabradine use within the first twelve months of age. Reference Gómez-Ganda, Parramón-Teixidó, Giralt-García, Fernández-García, Ferrer-Menduiña and Cabañas-Poy9,Reference Ergul, Ozturk, Ozgur, Ozyurt, Cilsal and Guzeltas10
In conclusion, we herein provide the first report on successful ivabradine usage for atrial arrhythmia in a paediatric cardiac transplant recipient. There is a mounting body of evidence that suggests safety and efficacy of ivabradine usage in paediatric patients. In addition, ivabradine shows promising results in adult cardiac transplant recipients in achieving both, heart rate control, and anti-arrhythmic treatment (when associated with increased automaticity). Further research is required to clarify its potential role in the vulnerable population of paediatric cardiac transplant recipients.
Acknowledgements
None.
Financial support
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests
None.
Ethical standards
This report does not involve human and/or animal experimentation.