Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T14:36:13.103Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experimental evidence that fire causes a tree recruitment bottleneck in an Australian tropical savanna

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2010

Lynda D. Prior*
Affiliation:
School for Environmental Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory 0909, Australia School of Plant Science, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia
Richard J. Williams
Affiliation:
CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, PMB 44, Winnellie, Northern Territory 0822, Australia
David M. J. S. Bowman
Affiliation:
School of Plant Science, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia
*
1Corresponding author. Email: lynda.prior@utas.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

A fire-mediated recruitment bottleneck provides a possible explanation for the coexistence of trees and grasses in mesic savannas. The key element of this hypothesis is that saplings are particularly vulnerable to fire because they are small enough to be top-killed by grass fires, but unlike juveniles, they take several years to recover their original size. This limits the number of recruits into the adult size classes. Thus savanna vegetation may be maintained by a feedback whereby fire restricts the density of adult trees and allows a grass layer to develop, which provides fuel for subsequent fires. Here, we use results from a landscape-scale fire experiment in tropical Australia, to explore the possible existence of a recruitment bottleneck. This experiment compared tree recruitment and survival over 4 y under regimes of no fire, annual early and annual late dry-season fire. Stem mortality decreased with increasing stem height in the fire treatments but not in the unburnt treatment. Tree recruitment was 76–84% lower in the fire treatments than the unburnt treatment. Such fire-induced stem loss of saplings and reduced recruitment to the canopy layer in this eucalypt savanna are consistent with the predictions of the fire-mediated recruitment bottleneck hypothesis.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010
Figure 0

Table 1. Initial plot basal area, initial tree density (≥3 m high), density of small adults (≥3 m high and <5 cm dbh), the annual areal and proportional recruitment rates for each fire treatment and the number of observations (n = tree-years) the proportional recruitment is based on. Plot basal area and tree densities are at the time measurements commenced (1991 for all except the extreme fire, which was in 1994). The extreme fire was unplanned and occurred in only two plots in the final year, after they had been unburnt for 7 y (Williams et al. 1999). Proportional recruitment is for all trees in that fire treatment, and thus there is no associated error term. Standard errors are shown.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Density of juveniles (<1.5 m high), saplings (1.5 to 3 m high) and adults (≥3 m high) in the three fire treatments in 1991, 1 y after fire treatments commenced. Bars show 1 SE.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Actual rates of stem loss in savanna trees during 4 y of the fire experiment at Kapalga, according to fire treatment and height class. Bars show the normal approximation confidence intervals for the binomial data presented here. Only those trees between 1.5 and 15 m high (in which stem loss decreased with tree height) were used in the modelling.

Figure 3

Table 2. Coefficients and standard errors of the best supported models, averaged according to the model AICc weights, to describe stem loss (proportion y−1) as a function of fire (no fire, early or late fire), height (m) and basal area (m2 ha−1). The intercept applies to the fast-turnover group and no fire.

Figure 4

Table 3. Coefficients and standard errors of the best supported models, averaged according to the model AICc weights, to describe area-based and proportional recruitment as a function of fire, basal area and small-adult density. Values are shown for all species combined, and the three eco-taxonomic groups. Analysis of area-based recruitment used Poisson generalized linear mixed models with a log link, and no transformation of small-adult density was required. Binomial generalized linear mixed models with a logit link were used to analyse proportional recruitment, and a square root transformation of small-adult density gave the best model fit.

Figure 5

Table 4. Number of observations (n = the number of trees, summed for each of the four years), number of recruits, areal and proportional recruitment rates for the three eco-taxonomic groups. Proportional recruitment is the proportion of trees >3 m high at the end of an interval that recruited to the size class during the interval.

Figure 6

Figure 3. Actual areal recruitment of trees per year during 4 y of the fire experiment at Kapalga, in relation to fire treatment and eco-taxonomic group. Areal recruitment was calculated for each plot, and averaged for each year; bars indicate 1 SE.