Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T23:40:43.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The importance of evaluating anatomy below the diaphragm in staged single-ventricle patients presenting with cyanosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2025

Amanda Gottschalk*
Affiliation:
Division of Cardiology, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA Department of Pediatrics, The Perelman School of Medicine at The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Michael L. O’Byrne
Affiliation:
Division of Cardiology, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA Department of Pediatrics, The Perelman School of Medicine at The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Jessica Tang
Affiliation:
Division of Cardiology, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA Department of Pediatrics, The Perelman School of Medicine at The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Ryan Callahan
Affiliation:
Division of Cardiology, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA Department of Pediatrics, The Perelman School of Medicine at The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
*
Corresponding author: Amanda Gottschalk; Email: gottschala@chop.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To highlight veno-venous collaterals and portosystemic shunts as possible causes of cyanosis requiring evaluation or treatment below the diaphragm in patients with single-ventricle physiology during staged palliation.

Background:

Cyanosis can complicate staged single-ventricle palliation and is often evaluated with imaging isolated to the thorax. As a result, lesions below the diaphragm, such as veno-venous collaterals and portosystemic shunts, may be missed. Identification is important since these lesions can be treated via transcatheter techniques.

Methods:

This study is a retrospective, single-centre case series of six patients.

Results and discussion:

Two patients following stage 2 palliation had multiple small veno-venous collaterals connecting to a reconstituted azygos with retrograde flow to below the diaphragm. Accessing veno-venous collaterals closer to their entry points below the diaphragm was more optimal for occlusion. Two patients following stage 3 palliation had veno-venous collaterals originating below the diaphragm and connecting to the pulmonary veins. Both patients required infrarenal inferior vena cava contrast injection to identify the veno-venous collateral. The final two patients had heterotaxy with either stage 2 or 3 palliation and were found to have bilateral pulmonary arteriovenous malformations secondary to a portosystemic shunt diverting hepatic factor away from the lungs. All patients had successful device closure of their veno-venous collaterals or portosystemic shunts.

Conclusion:

The six patients discussed demonstrate the importance of evaluating below the diaphragm in single-ventricle physiology patients presenting with cyanosis.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Patient 1 – Stage 2: Left SVC to reconstituted azygos. (a) Power injection in the left SVC demonstrating multiple VVCs entering a reconstituted azygos. (b) Reconstituted azygos draining to left sided IVC. (c) Thoracic azygos. (d) Status post azygos occlusion with two AVP II devices. 1. Left SVC. 2. VVCs. 3. Reconstituted azygos. 4. Azygos. 5. Left renal vein. 6. Vascular plugs.

Figure 1

Table 1. Overview of patient and procedural characteristics

Figure 2

Figure 2. Patient 2 – Stage 2: Left SVC to reconstituted azygos. (a) Power injection in the left SVC demonstrating multiple VVCs entering a reconstituted azygos. (b) Glide catheter entering the azygos from the left renal vein. (c) Thoracic azygos. (d) Status post azygos occlusion with three AVP II devices. 1. Pigtail injecting in left SVC. 2. VVCs. 3. Reconstituted azygos. 4. Glide catheter. 5. Left renal vein. 6. Azygos. 7. Vascular plugs.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Patient 3 – Stage 3: Right azygos to right upper PV. (a) Digital subtraction angiography of the infrarenal IVC with balloon occlusion of the hepatic IVC demonstrating collaterals from the left renal vein and IVC connecting to the azygos. (b) Glide catheter through a steerable sheath entering the tortuous IVC collateral. (c) Large thoracic azygos with connection to the right upper PV. (d) Status post azygos occlusion with two AVP II devices. 1. Sizing balloon. 2. Collateral. 3. IVC. 4. Steerable sheath. 5. Glide catheter. 6. Right upper PV. 7. Vascular plugs.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Patient 4 – Stage 3: Left renal vein collateral to left lower PV. (a) Digital subtraction angiography in the infrarenal IVC demonstrating a VVC arising from the left renal vein to the left lower PV. (b)/(c) Large tortuous collateral connecting to the left lower PV. (d) Status post collateral occlusion with two AVP II devices. 1. IVC. 2. Left renal vein. 3. VVC. 4. Long sheath. 5. 0.035’’ support wire. 6. Left lower PV. 7. Vascular plugs.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Patient 5 – Stage 3: Portosystemic shunt causing bilateral pulmonary AVMs. (a) Power injection in the right SVC demonstrating diffuse AVMs. (b) Power injection in the left SVC demonstrating diffuse AVMs. (c)/(d) Digital subtraction angiography in the infrarenal IVC with balloon occlusion of the hepatic IVC demonstrating a portosystemic shunt between the portal vein and left renal vein. The portal system appears well developed. (e) Test occlusion of the portosystemic shunt with glide catheter distal to the compliant balloon for pressure assessment. (f) Unreleased AVP II in the portosystemic shunt at its connection to the left renal vein. 1. Right SVC. 2. AVMs. Left SVC. 4. Sizing balloon. 5. IVC. 6. Renal vein. 7. Portosystemic shunt. 8. Portal vein. 9. Compliant balloon. 10. Glide catheter in portosystemic shunt. 11. Vascular plug.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Patient 6 – Stage 2: Portosystemic shunt causing bilateral pulmonary AVMs. (a) Power injection in the right PA demonstrating diffuse AVMs. (b) Power injection in the left PA demonstrating diffuse AVMs. (c)/(d) Anterior-posterior and lateral images of a glide catheter in the azygos vein injecting into the portosystemic shunt. The portal system appears well developed. (e)/(f) Status post portosystemic shut occlusion with an AVPII device. 1. Right PA. 2. AVMs. 3. Left PA. 4. Glide catheter in azygos vein. 5. Portosystemic shunt. 6. Portal system. 7. Azygos vein. 8. Vascular plug.

Supplementary material: File

Gottschalk et al. supplementary material

Gottschalk et al. supplementary material
Download Gottschalk et al. supplementary material(File)
File 14.2 KB