Introduction
The green lacewing, Chrysoperla zastrowi sillemi (Esben-Peterson) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) often referred as aphid lions, is the most successful versatile predator of several aphids (Singh et al, Reference Singh, Singh, Singh, Singh, Kant and Pal2024b). Being a predominant natural predator of arthropod herbivores across ecosystems, it plays a crucial role in maintaining ecosystem balance (Berteloot et al, Reference Berteloot, Peusens, Belien, Leeuwen and Clercq2024). In addition, ease of rearing, exceptional prey seeking and dispersal abilities and tolerance to certain pesticides make this predator an important and suitable biological control agent (Mushtaq and Khan, Reference Mushtaq and Khan2010; Yilmaz and Akkopru, Reference Yilmaz and Akkopru2020; Kayahan, 2021). The green lacewing larvae are voracious feeders to devour a large number of aphids over their lifetime, while, the adults primarily consume nectar, pollen, honeydew and are well-adapted to thrive in diverse ecological conditions (Chandana et al, Reference Chandana, Sood and Sharma2020b; Shaukat, Reference Shaukat2018). In laboratory conditions, C. zastrowi sillemi may be effectively mass-reared at various temperatures (Nandan et al, Reference Nandan, Korat and Dabhi2014; Rajareddy et al, Reference Rajareddy, Shashikala, Jayanth, Udaykumar and Paul2024).
Pterochloroides persicae Cholodkovsky (Hemiptera: Aphididae) commonly known as the giant peach aphid, clouded peach bark aphid, brown peach aphid, cloudy-winged peach aphid or woody aphid is a polyphagous pest that feeds on various hosts from the families like rosaceae, rutaceae and salicaceae with a strong preference for host plants in Prunus genus (Lassaad and Monia, Reference Lassaad and Monia2015; Singh et al, Reference Singh, Verma, Sharma, Chandel, Chandel, Chauhan, Semwal, Sharma, Kalia, Bhandari and Sharma2024a). These aphids camouflage themselves within tree bark, weakening young fruit trees, causing branch wilting and reducing overall fruit production (Mahendiran et al, Reference Mahendiran, Akbar and Dar2018). In peach and nectarine plantations, large colonies of P. persicae, infests stems and principal branches, while smaller colonies also infest subsidiary branches (Stoetzel, Reference Stoetzel1994). P. persicae excretes excessive amounts of honeydew, often in the form of a rain-like or shower-like discharge. This accumulation of honeydew promotes the growth of sooty mould, resulting in the darkening of the entire stem, branches and surrounding basin area (Singh et al, Reference Singh, Verma, Sharma, Chandel, Chandel, Chauhan, Semwal, Sharma, Kalia, Bhandari and Sharma2024a). This pest has been documented infesting peach orchards in the Indian regions of Himachal Pradesh, Kashmir and Punjab. Additionally, this pest causes severe yield losses in peaches in countries like Pakistan, Iraq, Afghanistan, Georgia and Armenia (CABI, 2022). Infestation of P. persicae leads to stunted development, weaker plants, early fruit drop, withered branches, curling of leaves and sooty mould development ultimately causing economic loss to farmer by reducing yields (Mahendiran et al, Reference Mahendiran, Akbar and Dar2018). Currently farmers rely on insecticides for management of this pest. For the protection of plants and the environment, biological control serves as an effective alternative to the widespread use of highly toxic insecticides commonly employed for their management (Khanzada et al, Reference Khanzada, Shaikh, Mastoi, Rajput, Jat, Mastoi and Ali2018). Therefore, considering the economic importance of P. persicae and lack of literature on its interaction with C. zastrowii sillemi, the study was conducted to investigate the developmental biology, population growth characteristics and predation efficiency of C. zastrowi sillemi preying on P. persicae.
Material and methods
Pure culture of the giant peach aphid, P. persicae was obtained from peach and nectarine plants in the fields of Department of Entomology and brought to the Bio-control Laboratory of Department of Entomology, Dr. YSP UHF, (Nauni) Solan, HP, India (30.85°N; 77.16°E) for further use in all experiments. C. zastrowi sillemi eggs were collected from the same fields and reared for one generation on P. persicae inside cages (45 × 45 × 45 cm) in a culture room maintained at 14 L: 10D photoperiod, 25 ± 1°C temperature and 70 ± 5% relative humidity. After completing one generation, the predator was used for various experiments at the same controlled environmental conditions.
Developmental biology and population growth parameters
Freshly laid eggs of C. zastrowi sillemi were taken from maintained pure culture under controlled environmental conditions and individually placed in 9 cm diameter, 1.5 cm high Petri plates. The hatching period of the eggs was monitored at 24-hour intervals. After hatching, counted numbers of P. persicae aphids were provided daily to the individual C. zastrowi sillemi larvae until pupation in the Petri plates. Each set was replicated 20 times. Pupae thus obtained were observed daily of adult emergence. After emergence of adults they were kept in pairs in glass chimneys (10 × 14.5 cm) for mating and honey solution (50%), protinex mixture (protinex, yeast, pollen and honey) and water were provided for foraging (Chandana et al, Reference Chandana, Sood and Sharma2020a). The chimneys were covered with black muslin cloth to create favourable conditions for egg deposition and after every 24 h, the fecundity was recorded. Observations on the duration of each development stage, survival, longevity and fecundity were recorded. Total pre-ovipositional period (TPOP), adult pre-ovipositional period (APOP), and fecundity rate were calculated using age-stage, two-sex life table theory (Chi, Reference Chi1988) and the TWOSEX MS-Chart computer program (Chi, 2018). The population growth parameters were calculated using the following formulas:
sxj = It indicates the likelihood that a newly emerged egg will survive to reach age x and stage j.
fxj = It indicates the number of eggs that hatch from an adult female at age x.
\begin{equation*}{l_x} = \sum\limits_{j = 1}^m {{s_{xj}}} \end{equation*}
\begin{equation*}{m_x} = \frac{{\sum\limits_{j = 1}^m {{s_{xj}}} {f_{xj}}}}{{{l_x}}}\end{equation*}Different population growth parameters were calculated using the variables mentioned above.
1. Net Reproductive rate (R0): The average number of offspring per female over her lifetime was calculated as:
\begin{equation*}{R_0} = \sum\limits_{x = 0}^\infty {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^m {{s_{xj}}} } {f_{xj}}\end{equation*}
\begin{equation*}{m_x} = \sum\limits_{x = 0}^\infty {{l_x}} \end{equation*}2. Gross reproductive rate (GRR): The cumulative number of female eggs deposited per female was calculated as:
\begin{equation*}GRR = \sum\nolimits_{x = 0}^\infty {{m_x}} \end{equation*}3. True generation time (T): The average time interval from the birth of parents to that of off-springs was estimated using the following formula:
\begin{equation*}T = \frac{{\ln {R_0}}}{r}\end{equation*}4. True intrinsic rate of increase (rm): The rate of increase of a population under ideal environmental conditions in which food and space are unlimited was estimated as follows:
\begin{equation*}\sum_{x=0}^\infty e^{-r\left(x+1\right)}l_xm_x=1\end{equation*}5. The finite rate of natural increase (
$\lambda $): The finite rate of natural increase representing the number of times the population multiplies per unit time, was computed using the following equation:
\begin{equation*}\lambda = {e^r}\end{equation*}6. The doubling time (DT): The time taken by a species to double its population it was computed as follows:
\begin{equation*}DT = \frac{{\ln 2}}{r}\end{equation*}7. Reproductive value (vxj): The contribution of individuals at age x and stage j to future population growth (Yang et al, Reference Yang, Li, Xie, Wu, Xu, Wang, Li and Zhang2015) was calculated as follows:
\begin{equation*}v_{xj}=\frac{e^{r(x+1)}}{s_{xj}}\sum_{i=x}^\infty{e^{-r(i+1)}}\sum_{y=j}^ms'_{iy}f_{iy}\end{equation*}8. Age-stage specific life expectancy (exj): The expected remaining lifespan of an organism at age x and stage j was calculated by the method proposed by Chi and Su (Reference Chi and Su2006) as presented below:
\begin{equation*}e_{xj}=\sum_{i=x}^\infty\sum_{y=j}^ms'_{iy}\end{equation*}where s’ iy is the probability that organisms of x and j were survive to age i and stage y.
Predatory potential
The predatory potential of all three C. zastrowi sillemi larval instars against P. persicae was investigated by recording daily survival and prey consumption data for each instar and this was replicated twenty times. The CONSUME-MS Chart (Chi, Reference Chi2020) was used to analyze the data and predator-prey kill parameters were determined using methods of van Lenteren et al (Reference van Lenteren, Bueno, Burgio, Lanzoni, Montes, Silva, de Jong and Hemerik2019).
sxj = likelihood that a newly laid egg will survive to reach age x and developmental stage j.
cxj = average consumption rate of an individual of age x and developmental stage j.
1. Age-specific predation rate (kx): It is defined as the number of hosts killed by the predators at age x and was determined as follows:
\begin{equation*}{k_x} = \frac{{\sum\nolimits_{j = 1}^\beta {{s_{xj}}{c_{xj}}} }}{{\sum\nolimits_{j = 1}^\beta {{s_{xj}}} }}\end{equation*}2. Age-specific net predation rate (qx): The age-specific survival rate represents the number of individuals surviving to age x, the net age-specific predation rate was calculated as follows:
\begin{equation*}{q_x} = {l_x}{k_x}\end{equation*}3. Net consumption rate (C0): It represents the number of hosts killed by a predator from the birth to age x, this parameter was determined as follows:
\begin{equation*}C_{0=}\sum\nolimits_{x=0}^\infty\sum\nolimits_{j=1}^\infty s_{xj}c_{xj}\end{equation*}4. Transformation rate (Qp): It represents the average number of prey required to be killed by a predator to produce one offspring and was computed as:
\begin{equation*}Q_p=\frac{C_0}{R_0}\end{equation*}5. Stable host kill rate (Ѱ): It denotes the proportion of individuals at age x and stage j within the stable age distribution (axj).
\begin{equation*}\psi = \sum\nolimits_{x = o}^\infty {\sum\nolimits_{j = 1}^\beta {{a_{xj}}{c_{xj}}} } \end{equation*}6. Finite Host kill rate (ω): The finite host killing rate was calculated to assess host-killing potential, was determined as follows:
\begin{equation*}\omega = \lambda \psi \end{equation*}
Statistical analysis
To assess developmental biology and population growth parameters, TWOSEX-MS Chart was used with bootstrap method with 100,000 replications to estimate population mean and standard error (Efron & Tibshirani, 1993). Predation rate and prey-kill parameters for C. zastrowii sillemi were determined using the CONSUME-MS Chart (Chi, Reference Chi2020).
Results
Developmental biology of Chrysoperla zastrowi sillemi
Developmental biology of C. zastrowi sillemi is presented in Table 1, the durations for egg, 1st, 2nd and 3rd instar were 2.21, 3.71, 2.29 and 3.21 days, respectively. Furthermore, the average lifespan of male and female C. zastrowi sillemi adults when feeding on P. persicae was 34.33 days and 42.12 days, respectively. The pupal period and pre-adult period were 7.71 and 19.21 days, respectively. The female’s adult pre-ovipositional period (APOP) lasted 6.25 days, while the total pre-ovipositional period (TPOP) from birth was 25.38 days, with a total of 21.88 days spent in oviposition.
Developmental biology of Chrysoperla zastrowi sillemi on Pterochloroides persicae

Two sex age-specific fertility rates
Life-fertility table analysis of C. zastrowi sillemi showed that females started laying eggs (mx) on 25th day with an average of 2.29 eggs per individual which increased to peak (5.57 eggs) on 31st day and then declined to zero on 59th day (Fig. 1(a)). The highest age-stage specific fecundity (fx) was recorded on 27th day with 0.107 eggs per individual. The age specific maternity (lxmx) showed variation and ranged between 0.1 to 3.3. The age specific survival rate (lx) was highest (1.0) at the beginning and then declined to 0.7 (4th day to 49th day) and became zero on 65th day of pivotal age.
(a) Age-specific fecundity, (b) age-stage-specific survival rate (sxj), (c) age-specific life expectancy (exj), (d) age-specific reproductive value (vxj) of Chrysoperla zastrowi sillemi on Pterochloroides persicae.

Age-stage specific survival rate
Fig. 1(b) illustrates the age-stage survival rate (sxj) for C. zastrowi sillemi, showing the likelihood of newly hatched larvae surviving to a specific age (x) and stage (j) while feeding on P. persicae. The overlapping curves for different developmental phases across all species highlight the varying survival rates for each stage. Notably, the pre-adult stage exhibited the maximum survival rate compared to the adult stage. The study revealed that first larval instar of C. zastrowi sillemi emerged on the 2nd day of pivotal age with 75% survival rate. C. zastrowi sillemi adults began emerging on the 18th day, with an initial survival rate of 70%. This rate gradually reduced with age, persisting until the 64th day. Larval survival remained constant at 100%, until the second day (first instar) and then decreased with age (Fig. 1(b)). Adult C. zastrowi sillemi exhibited constant survival rates up to the 58th day for females and upto 49th day for males, respectively.
Age-specific life expectancy
Fig. 1(c) displays the age-stage-specific life expectancy (exj), representing the estimated remaining lifespan of an organism at a given age (x) and stage (j). At birth, C. zastrowi sillemi had a life expectancy of 41.60 days, which decreased with age. Immature stages were found to have higher life expectancies compared to adult stages. The maximum life expectancy was observed in males and females on the 18th day of the pivotal age with 35.66 and 43.25 days, respectively.
Age-specific reproductive value
The age-stage reproductive value (vxj) presented in Fig. 1(d) demonstrates a gradual increase, reaching a peak at a specific age, followed by a subsequent decline to zero as the individuals aged. The reproductive value was 1.11 at birth, and on the 30th day of the crucial age, it reached its maximum value of 47.63.
Population growth parameters of Chrysoperla zastrowi sillemi against Pterochloroides persicae
The parameters of C. zastrowi sillemi population growth were presented in Table 2. The true generation time (T), net reproductive rate (R0), gross reproductive rate (GRR), finite rate of increase (λ) (females/day), and intrinsic rate of increase (rm) were 35.39, 52.64, 76.56, 1.117, and 0.110, respectively (Table 2). Chrysoperla zastrowi sillemi females feeding on P. persicae displayed a total fecundity of 131.77 ± 4.676 eggs/individual and doubling time (DT) of 6.18 days.
Population growth parameters of Chrysoperla zastrowi sillemi against Pterochloroides persicae

Consumption of Chrysoperla zastrowi sillemi against Pterochloroides persicae
The mean numbers of P. persicae aphids consumed by the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd larval instars of C. zastrowi sillemi were 18.36, 25.07, and 85.21, respectively (Table 3). The obtained results on the predation of C. zastrowi sillemi on P. persicae revealed that the 3rd instar larvae exhibited higher voracity compared to the earlier instars.
Consumption of Chrysoperla zastrowi sillemi against Pterochloroides persicae

The age-specific cumulative predation rate varied from 2.05 to 90.85 aphids per day. The net predation rate (C0) of C. zastrowi sillemi was recorded as 90.868 aphids per day, whereas, the other parameters viz. finite predation rate (ω) and stable predation rate (ψ) for C. zastrowi sillemi were recorded as 5.776 and 5.168, respectively. The transformation rate (Qp) was recorded as 1.84, indicating an estimate of 1.84 aphids needed for C. zastrowi sillemi to produce a single offspring (Table 4).
Prey-kill parameters of Chrysoperla zastrowi sillemi against Pterochloroides persicae

The age-specific predation rate (kx) ranged from 2.05 to 34.5 aphids per day, reaching its maximum value (34.5 aphids/day) on the 10th day of the pivotal age. The age-specific predation rate (kx) exhibited an increasing trend until the 10th day of the critical age and then gradually declined, reaching zero on the 11th day (Fig. 2). Both the age-specific predation rate (kx) and the age-specific net predation rate (qx) peaked on the 10th day of the critical age, with values of 34.5 aphids/day and 24.15 aphids/day, respectively. The age-specific cumulative consumption rate (C0) varied from 2.05 to 90.85 aphids per day, while the net lifetime predation rate was recorded as 90.85 aphids per day.
Age-specific predation rate (kx), net age-specific predation rate (qx) and cumulative predation rate (C0) of Chrysoperla zastrowi sillemi on Pterochloroides persicae.

Discussion
The developmental period of C. zastrowi sillemi as described in Table 1 describes the incubation period, time spent in each larval instar, pupal an adult stage indicating the ability to complete its biology on P. persicae. Our study is in line with the findings of Singh et al (Reference Singh, Singh, Sachan and Khilari2020), Kumari et al (Reference Kumari, Verma, Sharma and Negi2020), Imam (Reference Imam2020), Wang et al (Reference Wang, Li, Yang, Guo, Dai, Ramirez-Romero, Jin and Wang2021), and Saljoqi et al (Reference Saljoqi, Khan, Ahmad, Khan, Sattar, Ahmad and Salim2023) who recorded the developmental duration of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd larval instars and pupal stage was completed in 2–4 days, 2–4 days, 2–4 days, and 5–8 days, respectively, while feeding on different prey species such as A. gossypii, A. craccivora, Megoura japonica, and Myzus persicae (Sulzer). The egg, APOP (adult pre-ovipositional period), and TPOP (total pre-ovipositional period) were 3–4, 2–6, and 25–35 days. The observed variation in developmental times is slightly different from our findings as this difference may be due to difference in prey species used in the experiment.
The values of intrinsic rate of increase (rm) and finite rate of increase (λ) suggested that P. persicae was an appropriate and adequate prey source for predator C. zastrowi sillemi (Table 2). The results of population growth parameters are in close conformity with Jokar and Zarabi (Reference Jokar and Zarabi2012) and Saeed and Razaq (Reference Saeed and Razaq2015) even though different aphid species (Schizaphis graminum, Brevicoryne brassicae, and Amrasca devastans) were used. The mean of rm, λ, DT and T for C. carnea varies from 0.12 to 0.15, 1.11 to 1.16, 4.8 to 6.3, and 34.93 to 40.00, respectively.
Based on the results shown in the Table 3, the consumption rate of 3rd instar larvae (85.21) of C. zastrowi sillemi were higher than that of 1st (18.36) and 2nd (25.07) larval instar, which may be explained by their larger body size which demands more nutritional needs. Similar results were shown by Vivek et al (Reference Vivek, Paul, Pandi and Shankarganesh2013) and Saeed and Razaq (Reference Saeed and Razaq2015) but with different aphid species (A. gossypii, Lipaphis erysimi and Amrasca devastans) in which 1st larval instar of C. carnea consumed aphids in the ranges from 6.67 to 12.40 aphids, 2nd and 3rd larval instar consumed 21.33 to 34.60 and 64.00 to 92.00 aphids during various developmental stages.
The current findings of prey-kill parameters are similar with the findings of Sharma (Reference Sharma2024), Yilmaz and Akkopru (Reference Yilmaz and Akkopru2020) and Wang et al (Reference Wang, Li, Yang, Guo, Dai, Ramirez-Romero, Jin and Wang2021) (Table 4) who reported that the transformation rate from host population to predator offspring (Qp), finite predation rate (ω) and stable predation rate (ψ) scales from 2.00 to 3.00, 6.00 to 9.00 and 5.00 to 8.00, respectively, when C. zastrowi sillemi fed on different prey i.e. Macrosiphum euphorbiae, walnut aphid (Chromaphis juglandicola) (Kalt.) and C. cephalonica eggs. These findings of our study seem to differ from those in the literature and these differences result from variations in the kind of prey that the predator consumed.
The results demonstrated that C. zastrowi sillemi was able to complete its lifecycle on P. persicae by efficiently devouring these aphids. All larval stages were observed to prey efficiently, with third-instar larvae exhibiting the highest predation rate compared to earlier instars. It is revealed that C. zastrowi sillemi was able to complete its lifecycle on this aphid; hence, it also can be utilized for rearing of C. zastrowi sillemi. These findings suggest the probability of C. zastrowi sillemi becoming a valuable biocontrol agent for the eco-friendly management of P. persicae. However, further long-term field studies are required for reaching a conclusion and implementing its use in integrated pest management programmes against P. persicae.
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to the Dr. Yashwant Singh Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni (Solan), HP – 173230 (India) for providing necessary facilities to conduct this research.
Author contributions
C.S., S.C.V., P.L.S., and S.G. planned and designed the research. C.S., A.S., S.G., and A.B. conducted the experiments, noted the observations and has done the data analysis and has prepared the original manuscript. C.S., S.C.V., P.L.S., R.S.C., V.G.S.C., A.S., S.G., and A.B. reviewed the manuscript and have given necessary corrections. C.S. and S.G. drafted the manuscript and prepared it according to the journal. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Financial support
No funding was received
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflicts of interest/competing interests