Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T19:16:23.756Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Petrography and geochemistry of the siliciclastic Araba Formation (Cambrian), east Sinai, Egypt: implications for provenance, tectonic setting and source weathering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2015

HOSSAM A. TAWFIK*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt
IBRAHIM M. GHANDOUR
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt Department of Marine Geology, Faculty of Marine Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, 80207 Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
WATARU MAEJIMA
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, Graduate School of Science, Osaka City University, Sumiyoshi-ku, Osaka 558–8585, Japan
JOHN S. ARMSTRONG-ALTRIN
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Unidad de Procesos Oceánicos y Costeros, Circuito exterior s/n, 04510 México D.F., México
ABDEL-MONEM T. ABDEL-HAMEED
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt
*
†Author for correspondence: hossam.abdelhameed@science.tanta.edu.eg
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Combined petrographic and geochemical methods are utilized to investigate the provenance, tectonic setting, palaeo-weathering and climatic conditions of the Cambrian Araba clastic sediments of NE Egypt. The ~ 60 m thick Araba Formation consists predominantly of sandstone and mudstone interbedded with conglomerate. Petrographically the Araba sandstones are mostly sub-mature and classified as subarkoses with an average framework composition of Q80F14L6. The framework components are dominated by monocrystalline quartz with subordinate K-feldspar, together with volcanic and granitic rock fragments. XRD analysis demonstrated that clay minerals comprise mixed-layer illite/smectite (I/S), illite and smectite, with minor kaolinite. Diagenetic features of the sandstone include mechanical infiltration of clay, mechanical and chemical compaction, cementation, dissolution and replacement of feldspars by carbonate cements and clays. The modal composition and geochemical parameters (e.g. Cr/V, Y/Ni, Th/Co and Cr/Th ratios) of the sandstones and mudstones indicate that they were derived from felsic source rocks, probably from the crystalline basement of the northern fringe of the Arabian–Nubian Shield. The study reveals a collisional tectonic setting for the sediments of the Araba Formation. Palaeo-weathering indices such as the chemical index of alteration (CIA), chemical index of weathering (CIW) and plagioclase index of alteration (PIA) of the clastic sediments suggest that the source area was moderately chemically weathered. On the northern margin of Gondwana, early Palaeozoic weathering occurred under fluctuating climatic conditions.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Correlation between the Cambrian rocks of Egypt and neighbouring countries. Adapted from (1) Bellini & Massa (1980); (2) Keeley (1989); (3) Issawi & Jux (1982); (4) Weissbrod & Perath (1990); (5) Lloyd (1968); and (6) (A. Al-Laboun, unpub. Ph.D. thesis, King Abdel-Aziz Univ. Saudi Arabia, 1982).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Map of Gondwana at the end of Neoproterozoic time showing the general arrangement of different tectonic elements (after Powell et al.1994).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Simplified location and geological maps of the Taba region, west of the Gulf of Aqaba, NE Egypt. Numbers refer to the location of the measured sections.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Measured sections (1 and 2) and the proposed depositional settings of the studied Araba sandstones exposed in the Taba region, east Sinai, Egypt.

Figure 4

Table 1. Textural parameters and modal composition of the Araba Formation

Figure 5

Figure 5. Photomicrographs of petrographic features of the Araba sandstones showing: (a) monocrystalline quartz grain (Qm) with abundant prismatic tourmaline inclusions, XPL; (b) rhyolite (Ry) and dacite (dc) fragments exhibiting spheriolitic and porphyritic textures, respectively, XPL; (c) a granitic rock fragment, PPL; (d) a zircon grain with abraded terminals, XPL; (e) an opaque (op) and a hornblende grain with fracture porosity, PPL.

Figure 6

Table 2. Representative results of electron microprobe analyses in the Araba sandstones

Figure 7

Figure 6. QFL triangle diagram showing the composition of the sandstones of the Araba Formation (after McBride, 1963). Q – quartz; F – feldspar; L – lithic grains.

Figure 8

Figure 7. QtFL and QmFLt ternary diagrams showing the main provenances of the Araba sandstones (after Dickinson et al.1983).

Figure 9

Figure 8. Photomicrograph, SEM and BSE images showing diagenetic features of the Araba sandstones: (a) An intensively crushed K-feldspar (fd) between rigid quartz grains (qz), XPL. (b) Sutured contact (arrow) developed along detrital quartz grains. (c) Honeycomb-shaped mixed-layer I/S clay coating engulfed by quartz overgrowth (qzov). (d) Fibrous illite with lath-like projections growing on I/S aggregates. (e) Tangential, cryptocrystalline smectite coating. (f) Kaolinite cement (k) completely occluding the pore spaces and engulfing smectite grain-coating (sm) (arrows).

Figure 10

Figure 9. Photomicrographs, SEM and BSE images showing the diagenetic features of the Araba Formation: (a) Micro-rosettes of haematite. (b) K-feldspar overgrowth (fdov) replaced by late-stage poikilotopic dolomite (dol), XPL. (c) Fluorapatite blade (ap) associated with hexagonal crystals of haematite (hm). (d) Halite cement engulfing all other minerals. (e, f) Intragranular macropores (p and arrows), in K-feldspar and hornblende grains, respectively, PPL. (g) Complete illitization of feldspar grain, XPL. (h) A characteristic expanded texture of mica (m) and kaolinite (k) replacement. (i) Corrosive poikilotopic barite cement (br) invading quartz grains (qz) and their overgrowth (qzov). Note the floating relics (arrows).

Figure 11

Table 3. Chemical composition of major elements (%) and trace elements (ppm) of the Araba sandstones and mudstones

Figure 12

Figure 10. Geochemical classification of the sandstones and mudstones of the Araba Formation (after Herron, 1988).

Figure 13

Figure 11. Multi-element plots of average chemistry of the Araba Formation normalized against UCC and PAAS (Taylor & McLennan, 1985). (a) Major-element concentrations of sandstones normalized against UCC; (b) major-element concentrations of mudstones normalized against PAAS; (c) trace-element concentrations of sandstones normalized against UCC; and (d) trace-element concentrations of mudstones normalized against PAAS.

Figure 14

Figure 12. Provenance discriminant function plot for the Araba sandstones and mudstones (after Roser & Korsch, 1988).

Figure 15

Figure 13. Cr/V v. Y/Ni diagram for the Araba sandstones and mudstones (after Hiscott, 1984).

Figure 16

Figure 14. TiO2–Ni diagram for the Araba sandstones and mudstones (after Floyd et al.1991).

Figure 17

Figure 15. New discriminant function multidimensional diagrams for (a) high-silica and (b) low-silica clastic sediments of the Araba Formation (after Verma & Armstrong-Altrin, 2013). The subscripts m1 and m2 in DF1 and DF2 are based on loge- and log ratios of major elements. The discriminant function equations are: DF1(Arc–Rift–Col)m1 = (−0.263 × In(TiO2/SiO2)adj) + (0.604 × In(Al2O3/SiO2)adj) + (−1.725 × In(Fe2O3t/SiO2)adj) + (0.660 × In(MnO/SiO2)adj) + (2.191 × In(MgO/SiO2)adj) + (0.144 × In(CaO/SiO2)adj) + (−1.304 × In(Na2O/SiO2)adj) + (0.054 × In(K2O/SiO2)adj) + (–0.330 × In(P2O5/SiO2)adj) + 1.588. DF2(Arc–Rift–Col)m2 = (−1.196 × In(TiO2/SiO2)adj) + (1.604 × In(Al2O3/SiO2)adj) + (0.303 × In(Fe2O3t/SiO2)adj) + (0.436 × In(MnO/SiO2)adj) + (0.838 × In(MgO/SiO2)adj) + (–0.407 × In(CaO/SiO2)adj) + (1.021 × In(Na2O/SiO2)adj) + (−1.706 × In(K2O/SiO2)adj) + (–0.126 × In(P2O5/SiO2)adj) – 1.068.

Figure 18

Figure 16. Al2O3–CaO*+Na2O–K2O ternary diagram for the Araba sandstones (after Nesbitt & Young, 1984). Arrow refers to trend of initial weathering profile of granite.

Figure 19

Figure 17. Chemical maturity of the Araba sandstones (after Suttner & Dutta, 1986).