Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T15:27:36.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chemically induced enucleation of activated bovine oocytes: chromatin and microtubule organization and production of viable cytoplasts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2014

Naiara Zoccal Saraiva*
Affiliation:
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental, Trav. Dr. Enéas Pinheiro, s/no, Caixa Postal 48, CEP 66095–100, Belém, PA, Brazil. Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Reprodução Animal, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, Brazil.
Clara Slade Oliveira
Affiliation:
Embrapa Dairy Cattle, Valença, Brazil.
Cláudia Lima Verde Leal
Affiliation:
Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, Brazil.
Marina Ragagnin de Lima
Affiliation:
Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Reprodução Animal, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, Brazil.
Maite Del Collado
Affiliation:
Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Reprodução Animal, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, Brazil. Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, Brazil.
Roberta Vantini
Affiliation:
Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Reprodução Animal, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, Brazil.
Fabio Morato Monteiro
Affiliation:
Centro APTA Bovinos de Corte, Instituto de Zootecnia, Sertãozinho, SP, Brazil.
Simone Cristina Méo Niciura
Affiliation:
Embrapa Southeast Livestock, São Carlos, Brazil.
Joaquim Mansano Garcia
Affiliation:
Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Reprodução Animal, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, Brazil.
*
All correspondence to: Naiara Zoccal Saraiva. Embrapa Amazônia Oriental, Trav. Dr. Enéas Pinheiro, s/no, Caixa Postal 48, CEP 66095–100, Belém, PA, Brazil. Tel: +55 91 3204 1113. e-mail: naiara.saraiva@embrapa.br
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

As the standard enucleation method in mammalian nuclear transfer is invasive and damaging to cytoplast spatial organization, alternative procedures have been developed over recent years. Among these techniques, chemically induced enucleation (IE) is especially interesting because it does not employ ultraviolet light and reduces the amount of cytoplasm eliminated during the procedure. The objective of this study was to optimize the culture conditions with demecolcine of pre-activated bovine oocytes for chemically IE, and to evaluate nuclear and microtubule organization in cytoplasts obtained by this technique and their viability. In the first experiment, a negative effect on oocyte activation was verified when demecolcine was added at the beginning of the process, reducing activation rates by approximately 30%. This effect was not observed when demecolcine was added to the medium after 1.5 h of activation. In the second experiment, although a reduction in the number of microtubules was observed in most oocytes, these structures did not disappear completely during assessment. Approximately 50% of treated oocytes presented microtubule reduction at the end of the evaluation period, while 23% of oocytes were observed to exhibit the complete disappearance of these structures and 28% exhibited visible microtubules. These findings indicated the lack of immediate microtubule repolymerization after culture in demecolcine-free medium, a fact that may negatively influence embryonic development. However, cleavage rates of 63.6–70.0% and blastocyst yield of 15.5–24.2% were obtained in the final experiment, without significant differences between techniques, indicating that chemically induced enucleation produces normal embryos.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 
Figure 0

Figure 1 Evaluation of nuclear kinetics. Photomicrographs of activated bovine oocytes treated with demecolcine. Categories of oocytes observed: (a) metaphase I (MI) oocyte; (b) metaphase II (MII) oocyte; (c) anaphase/telophase II (AII/TII) oocyte. Oocytes were stained with Hoechst 33342 and observed under an epifluorescence microscope. The arrows indicate nuclear material (blue). Bar = 50 μm.

Figure 1

Figure 2 Evaluation of microtubule configuration. Photomicrographs of activated bovine oocytes treated with demecolcine. Categories of oocytes observed: (a) oocyte with microtubules (MTs); (b) oocyte with reduced MTs; (c) oocyte without MTs. Oocytes were stained with FITC-conjugated anti-α tubulin antibody (1:50) and observed under an epifluorescence microscope. The arrows indicate MTs (green). Bar = 50 μm.

Figure 2

Table 1 Percentage of metaphase II (MII), activated, and enucleated (EN) oocytes in the control group (CON), group activated with 5 μM ionomycin for 5 min and 10 μg/ml cycloheximide (ACTIV), and group activated and treated with 0.05 μg/ml demecolcine (DEME) for 0, 4 and 5 h

Figure 3

Table 2 Percentage of activated oocytes after incubation in medium containing 5 μM ionomycin for 5 min and 10 μg/ml cycloheximide for 4 h and different times of treatment with demecolcine: DEME 0–2 h (exposure to demecolcine between 0 and 2 h of activation); DEME 0–4 h; DEME 0.5–2.5 h; DEME 0.5–4 h; DEME 1–3 h; DEME 1–4 h; DEME 1.5–3.5 h; DEME 1.5–4 h; DEME 2–4 h

Figure 4

Figure 3 Graphic representation of the percentage of enucleated oocytes (EN) after activation with 5 μM ionomycin for 5 min and 10 μg/ml cycloheximide for up to 4 h and different treatments with demecolcine: group 1 (DEME 0–2 h); group 2 (DEME 0–4 h); group 3 (DEME 0.5–2.5 h); group 4 (DEME 0.5–4 h); group 5 (DEME 1–3 h); group 6 (DEME 1–4 h); group 7 (DEME 1.5–3.5 h); group 8 (DEME 1.5–4 h); group 9 (DEME 2–4 h). a–dColumns followed by different superscript letters differ from one another (P < 0.05, chi-squared test). ACTIV: activated group; CON: control group.

Figure 5

Figure 4 Graphic representation of nuclear kinetics in activated bovine oocytes treated with demecolcine and evaluated at intervals of 0.5 and 1.0 h between 0 and 10 h after the onset of activation. Control (not activated or treated with demecolcine); Activated (exposed only to the oocyte-activating agents); DEME (activated and treated with demecolcine for 2 h). (A) Immature oocytes; (B) mature oocytes; (C) activated oocytes. The asterisk indicates exposure to demecolcine.

Figure 6

Figure 5 Graphic representation of microtubule kinetics in activated bovine oocytes treated with demecolcine and evaluated at intervals of 0.5 and 1.0 h between 0 and 10 h after the onset of activation. Control (not activated or treated with demecolcine); Activated (exposed only to the oocyte-activating agents); DEME (activated and treated with demecolcine for 2 h). (A) oocytes with microtubules; (B) oocytes with reduced microtubules; (C) oocytes without microtubules. The asterisk indicates exposure to demecolcine.

Figure 7

Table 3 Number and percentage of cleaved embryos and blastocysts produced by nuclear transfer from donor embryo cells after conventional or chemically induced enucleation in bovine