Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T15:39:33.981Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Increased Contamination of Blood Cultures Collected via New Peripheral IV Start vs Venipuncture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2026

Brandi Manning
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University
Sydney Agnello
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University
Shandra Day
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Satomi Abe
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Kelci Coe
Affiliation:
Ohio State Wexner Medical Center
Nora Colburn
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Background: Blood culture contamination leads to increased healthcare costs and patient harm. Routine practice at our institution oftentimes involves placement of a new peripheral intravenous catheter (IV) followed by immediate blood culture collection from the catheter. Published guidelines discourage routine blood culture collection from central venous catheters, but do not address collection from new IV starts. We hypothesized higher contamination rates in cultures collected from new IV starts. To evaluate, mandatory documentation of blood culture collection site was implemented and contamination rates were analyzed. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted from September to December 2025 at a large quaternary medical center. Peripheral blood culture contamination rates were measured using the CLSI definition. Mandatory documentation of collection site was implemented September 2025 and included an option for “new IV start”. Contamination rates by collection site were compared using chi-squared tests. An estimated cost of $4,538 for each contamination event was based on pooled published cost analyses data. Results: During the study period, 15,926 peripheral blood culture sets were collected and 234 (1.47%) met contamination criteria. Table 1 shows the new IV start contamination rate was significantly higher than all other sites combined (p-value <0.001 with an odds ratio of 1.86 [1.34-2.54]). The difference remained when comparing new IV start to individual anatomic sites. Per year, an estimated 89 contaminations would be avoided if cultures are not obtained from new IV starts with an estimated savings of $403,882 and 267 antimicrobial days. Conclusions: At our institution, it is common practice to collect blood cultures immediately after inserting a peripheral IV. The contamination rate of new IV starts was nearly double the contamination rate of dedicated upper extremity venipuncture leading to increased costs and unnecessary antimicrobial use. The large sample size provides robust data that collecting blood cultures from a new IV start should be avoided and this compelling data should be used to update published guidelines.

A table showing blood culture contamination rates by collection site.

Information

Type
Quality Improvement
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America