Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-54qdv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T18:00:39.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Initial experiments on the effects of particles at grain boundaries on the anelasticity and creep behavior of granular ice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2017

Min Song
Affiliation:
Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover NH 03755-8000, USA E-mail: Min.Song@Dartmouth.edu
David M. Cole
Affiliation:
US Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, 72 Lyme Road, Hanover NH 03755-1290, USA
Ian Baker
Affiliation:
Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover NH 03755-8000, USA E-mail: Min.Song@Dartmouth.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experimental observations of the influence of particles at grain boundaries on the anelasticity and creep behavior of granular fresh-water ice are presented. Ice with particle contents of 0–4 wt.% was investigated under both reversed direct-stress and creep loading conditions at –12˚C. The results show that the particles decreased the grain-boundary relaxation by suppressing grain-boundary sliding at higher frequencies (10–1 to 101 Hz). In addition, the modulus increased by up to 30%, and the internal friction decreased by up to 30% at a frequency of 1 Hz. Staged creep tests showed that the particles affected the creep rate substantially. The minimum creep rate of ice containing 1 wt.% particles is 40% higher than that of particle-free ice, indicating that mechanisms besides dislocation glide aid the creep deformation.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) [year] 2004
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Modulus and internal friction as function of cyclic loading frequency for particle-free ice and debris-laden ice (before creep).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Minimum strain rate vs debris content for specimens with particles at the grain boundaries.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Creep rate vs viscous strain for particle-free ice and debris-laden ice with particles at the grain boundaries (stress level 1.45 MPa).

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Calculated dislocation density vs viscous strain.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Relationship between dislocation density and viscous strain. The lines were fitted using linear regression.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Microstructures (a) before and (b) after staged-creep test for ice with 1 wt.% particles (strain 0.07).

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Microstructures after staged-creep test for debris-laden ice with different particle contents. (a) Particle-free ice (strain 0.06); (b) 0.5 wt.% particles ice (strain 0.075); (c) 1 wt.% particles ice (strain 0.07); and (d) 4 wt.% particles ice (strain 0.075).